[DGthe3]

Originally Posted by SleepWarz

I'd say you folks have enough 'nucks' to cause an eartquake =p


Or just ask part of your population to all jump up at once.......


HOLY CRAP YOU DO HAVE AN EARTHQUAKE WEAPON!

There were also stories that it was caused by a French nuclear weapon ...

[Oddball]

Does anybody remember the name of the fault that runs under Missouri?

[DGthe3]

Originally Posted by Oddball

Does anybody remember the name of the fault that runs under Missouri?

New Madrid

[Oddball]

Originally Posted by DGthe3

New Madrid

Thank you.

Can you imagine the effects a 7+ magnitude quake would have on that region?

[PQ]

Originally Posted by Oddball

Thank you.

Can you imagine the effects a 7+ magnitude quake would have on that region?

Not as bad as Haiti. We have things called 'Building Codes'

[2001ragtop]

Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65

If we had an "Earthquake Weapon," we wouldn't have aimed it at Haiti.

Hell, if we had an "Earthquake Weapon," Chavez wouldn't be able to make a statement at all.

i don't want to even know what kind of weapons exist these days. hopefully that one is truly imaginary

[Brokinarrow]

Originally Posted by drivingincamaro

a 5.0 is way less worse then a 7.0 , 7.0 I remember hearing about how much points you go up it increases by a lot

Richter scale increases in an exponential manner (regarding power of the quake). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richter_scale

[reddevilseye]

one question, why dominican republic didnt feel anything?? its 7+ god dam it its not 4 or 5
theres something fishy and we can cause that and we need to test its effect some where and islands are the easiest to do so, we have all the tec to do so, subs drills and bombs,
its like the bio weapon program that when the public new about nixon was forced to cancel it and tell all ppl its gone, but 1992 in iraq who used it???? we did and we still work on it, there is no need to let you or me know what they r doing

[Brokinarrow]

Originally Posted by reddevilseye

one question, why dominican republic didnt feel anything?? its 7+ god dam it its not 4 or 5
theres something fishy and we can cause that and we need to test its effect some where and islands are the easiest to do so, we have all the tec to do so, subs drills and bombs,
its like the bio weapon program that when the public new about nixon was forced to cancel it and tell all ppl its gone, but 1992 in iraq who used it???? we did and we still work on it, there is no need to let you or me know what they r doing

Oh, its oook, just go back in the corner and put your tin foil hat on, mm k?

[Brokinarrow]

And to further prove your craziness, read red text below:

Originally Posted by reddevilseye

one question, why dominican republic didnt feel anything?? They did, if you payed any attention to the news, they said the quake was felt in the Dominican Republic and Cuba, but no damage was caused
its 7+ god dam it its not 4 or 5 '7.0-7.9 Major Can cause serious damage over larger areas.' Thats off of the wiki link I included Over large areas, and as it was a 7.0 that range probably only extends 25 miles or so
theres something fishy and we can cause that and we need to test its effect some where and islands are the easiest to do so, we have all the tec to do so, subs drills and bombs,
its like the bio weapon program that when the public new about nixon was forced to cancel it and tell all ppl its gone, but 1992 in iraq who used it???? Ok, what the crap are you talking about here? we did and we still work on it, there is no need to let you or me know what they r doing

Again, go put on your tin foil hat.

[reddevilseye]

i dont need to,if we learned one thing in the past 100 years is that we can do what we think is imposible or just gods work
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/may/25/north-korea-hiroshima-nuclear-test
this is the resent north Korea test caused 4.5 earthquake,the thing is posible to be made,
or someone was testing his new camaro its also posible

[Brokinarrow]

Originally Posted by reddevilseye

i dont need to,if we learned one thing in the past 100 years is that we can do what we think is imposible or just gods work
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/may/25/north-korea-hiroshima-nuclear-test
this is the resent north Korea test caused 4.5 earthquake,the thing is posible to be made,
or someone was testing his new camaro its also posible

yeah, but a 4.5 isn't anything but your shelves shaking a little bit. So setting off a more powerful nuke may indeed produce a more powerful earthquake. But if that was the case here, it would have been detected. This quake's epicenter originated 5 miles below the surface of the Earth.... not exactly a depth we can drill to. Again, if you pay attention to the news it was stated that this area was overdue for an earthquake as it sits on a MAJOR FAULT LINE.

Now, I'm not saying you should blindly accept everything the media says (as that would be unwise), but there are enough different sources stating this that I can accept the findings.

[DGthe3]

At the surface, the energy released in an 7+ magnitude earthquake is equivalent to a very large nuclear bomb, equal to the largest ever detonated. However, there is currently no known method to release all that energy in the form of a shockwave. In a nuclear explosion its released mainly as heat. Super-secret doomsday weapons are pure science fiction, with emphasis on fiction. An earthquake weapon would be dependent upon the discovery some way to first generate the waves (like the discovery of nuclear fission led to the first nuclear bombs). On top of that, if it was a test of an earthquake weapon why not target it against an unpopulated pacific island instead of a poor nation with millions of people? It just makes no sense.

And the notion that it was a nuclear detonation, buried deep underground is equally preposterous. First, it would need to be several times larger than the largest nuke ever detonated because its underground. And second, someone would have made a huge announcement. Most highly developed nations can detect earthquakes and nuclear explosions (even underground ones) and know the difference between the two. Using a similar line of thought, the Soviets indirectly proved that the Apollo moon landings were not a hoax ... they could intercept the radio transmissions coming from the moon and would have said something if things didn't match up.

[Brokinarrow]

Originally Posted by DGthe3

Using a similar line of thought, the Soviets indirectly proved that the Apollo moon landings were not a hoax ... they could intercept the radio transmissions coming from the moon and would have said something if things didn't match up.

Now THAT i hadn't heard before Good stuff right there.