|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 95' camaro Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 15
|
What to do next...
I'm trying to figure out where to focus next for the Camaro.
Current build - '16 2SS M6 Whipple 3.0L (4" upper) DSX FF Sensor RotoFab CAI LT4 Fuel System TSP LT Headers MBRP Header-Back BMR Driveshaft Loop (ordered) A few other unimportant things. The next "big" step I would "like" to take is a lower CR piston/rod combo, CNC ported heads, camshaft + valvetrain, and (likely needed for E) port injection runners for the Whipple. However, I would like to do that all at once and it isn't in the current budget. Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 2ss 6mt Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,606
|
What are your plans with the car?
Drag racing? Autocross? Posting videos of running from the cops? Adding parts until you have got all of barbies wardrobe? Upgrading a car is finding the weak link and making it better. But to determine what is the next weakest link, you have to have a purpose behind the build. If you feel you need to just keep buying anything offered for the platform, you might think of buying a Jeep. You will fit right in with those guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
![]() Drives: 95' camaro Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
Haha! Love it. Honestly, it's just for fun. I have no real intent, maybe the strip here and there. I mostly enjoy the pursuit of performance for nothing more than the pursuit itself. If I had to put a target on the build direction, it would be street-strip focused. Externally, I aim for a mostly stock or factory-like appearance while wanting performance far beyond--I don't think a Jeep would be for me. I know drivetrain is going to become a weak link sooner, rather than later--especially with the above intended upgrades. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,350
|
Quote:
Upping the boost will mean getting a better fuel system like big DI stuff (Katech or LPE) or port injection like TooHighPSI. Laynlo15 did THPSI port injection on his stock bottom end LT1 and got into the 9’s so that’s pretty dang impressive.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
![]() Drives: 95' camaro Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
You did the 15" conversion on yours, right? I was thinking that would be my aim for a drag pack. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 2ss 6mt Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,606
|
You never really hear much about people running nitrous on these cars. Considering the gains you can get from e85 with high compression direct injection, i would think nitrous would be even better on these vs older design engines
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,350
|
Quote:
Nitrous spikes cylinder pressure and is very hard on parts. Too easy to make power on this platform without the hassle of nitrous.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,661
|
That's because it's so easy to make consistent reliable power with boost. Nitrous made sense when you needed an engineering degree to do forced induction on some platforms. Especially those with ECM limitations. All the tables and sensors have been available to run forced induction on GM factory ECU's since gen 4 LS. So it's a no brainer for street cars. I can still see a case being made for running nitrous on a drag car.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 19' ZL1 A10, w/pdr Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: S.W. ohio
Posts: 1,722
|
My concern would be the drive train. The Zl1 as we know has beefer axles but, not sure if the driveshaft is different. Clutch and pressure plates? What power are you looking to obtain?
__________________
BTR Stg II cam w/ 38% fuel lobe, ARH 2" headers into 3" w/Gesi cats, Kong X port, Weapon X triple ht exchangers, NW 103, Rotofab big gulp, DSX lowside, TCM tune, BMR Lockout, Mustang dyno 720 rwhp, 634 rwtq on 93 pump.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
![]() Drives: 95' camaro Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
That has been my biggest concern (also why I ordered the DSL from BMR for now). I am not sure what exactly the limit of the M6 is (varying from person to person), but I would assume stepping over ~700 to the wheels is going to at least warrant a better clutch. This is assuming traction is actually present ![]() The main purpose behind making this thread is to get some ideas from the masses of things that have been mentioned here that quickly become concerns as power rises. As @bishopts post points out, its easy to throw parts at a car just because they look pretty - AutoZone has an entire isle for that (the 'pretty' part is quite subjective). Now, to be fair, I am not sure how far I am going to take this build. I doubt I will go as far as @Joshinator99 has, as I am also building a '67 with the intent of going HEAVILY strip focused with a splash of "I guess I *could* drive this on the street." For a target end-goal, I guess mid 900s to the wheels would be the aim long term. However, I don't see that happening in the near future. Also, as many others here can attest, the desire keeps burning after achieving goals..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2020 Camaro ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|