Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > V8 LT1 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2025, 11:42 AM   #1
Saberscar223
 
Saberscar223's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 Riverside Blue 2SS
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Denver,CO
Posts: 278
My Final Opitions for boosting the LT1

Alot of you have given me really good advice and here are my final options for Engine integrity when adding a Magnesun 2650. My goal is 700-750whp.

Plan A: I add the Magnesun 2650 and too high psi Port Injection and leave internals stock. Since I have a bigger cam as well I'm hoping Id be able to run full E85 on this setup.

Plan B: I add the Magnesun 2650, TSP drop in pistons and the LT4 fueling system and run 93.

Plan C: I just add the Magnesun 2650, keep the boost low and run 93, Ive been told that would be safe with the bigger cam and its also the cheapest option.
Saberscar223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2025, 03:35 PM   #2
Katech_Mike

 
Drives: 2015 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Clinton Twp, Michigan
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saberscar223 View Post
Alot of you have given me really good advice and here are my final options for Engine integrity when adding a Magnesun 2650. My goal is 700-750whp.

Plan A: I add the Magnesun 2650 and too high psi Port Injection and leave internals stock. Since I have a bigger cam as well I'm hoping Id be able to run full E85 on this setup. - This will likely not last long. 700RWHP+ is asking from trouble with stock bottom end

Plan B: I add the Magnesun 2650, TSP drop in pistons and the LT4 fueling system and run 93. - Stock cam will limit you to 650-675RWHP

Plan C: I just add the Magnesun 2650, keep the boost low and run 93, Ive been told that would be safe with the bigger cam and its also the cheapest option. - LT1 fuel system will further limit the power output. 525RWHP range from memory
See above in red.
Katech_Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2025, 04:28 PM   #3
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katech_Mike View Post
See above in red.
He already has an aftermarket cam.
__________________

2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2025, 04:34 PM   #4
18.2SS.1LE
 
18.2SS.1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: Chevrolet Camaro
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Maryland
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saberscar223 View Post
Alot of you have given me really good advice and here are my final options for Engine integrity when adding a Magnesun 2650. My goal is 700-750whp.

Plan A: I add the Magnesun 2650 and too high psi Port Injection and leave internals stock. Since I have a bigger cam as well I'm hoping Id be able to run full E85 on this setup.

Plan B: I add the Magnesun 2650, TSP drop in pistons and the LT4 fueling system and run 93.

Plan C: I just add the Magnesun 2650, keep the boost low and run 93, Ive been told that would be safe with the bigger cam and its also the cheapest option.
Go with plan A, you'll have room to grow with the port injection if you decide to put some drop ins and a low side fuel system down the road. You'll be at the limit with that power on the SBE, especially with the torque the 2650 makes down low. Have someone reputable tune it!
__________________
Procharger P1X, CSP Big Boy Cam, CSP Headers, LT5 Throttle Body, MSD Intake, LT4 HPFP, LT4 Injectors, JMS BAP, 93 + Boostane - 750+WHP
18.2SS.1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2025, 05:38 PM   #5
GreyGhost702
 
Drives: 2019 Camaro 1SS1LE
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Utah
Posts: 370
I don't have any experience with the port injection systems, but I'm fairly certain even the 1LE pump won't support both DI & Port Injection on its own. Either beefing up the in-tank setup or running an Aux system is likely necessary.

I think your plan B is the best bet if you're on a strict budget. Would like to see Pistons AND Rods in that plan, though. Rods take quite a beating on PD setups. The OE rods have been proven to be soft, some shops have taken apart engines that hadn't failed but had rods that were tweaked. Though, probably softened up by detonation, which wouldn't happen if there's enough fuel and good fuel. It wouldn't hurt to have some fresh bearings to punish as well. The LT4 system will support some E and that's going to let you make consistent power as well.
__________________
2019 1SS1LE M6 Shadow Gray Metallic
ProCharger D1X Race Kit - 4.25" Pulley || GPI Pistons/Rods - ACL Bearings - ARP Hardware || LME Timing Chain Guide || Katech C5R Timing Chain || Katech OE Spec Billet Oil Pump || OE Ported Heads || CHE Trunnion Upgrade || BTR 220 Cam - BTR .660" Dual Springs - GM Racing "Caddy" Lifters - BTR 3/8" Pushrods (7.825") || ATI Balancer || LT4 Injectors || LT4 HPFP || JMS BAP || DSX Flex Fuel || LT2 Intake Manifold || LTH (Catless) || Stainless Works Redline Series NPP || 91 + 8oz Boostane

7/26/2024 Tuning in progress
GreyGhost702 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2025, 07:53 PM   #6
2023TwoSS
 
Drives: 23 2SS Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2023
Location: Buford, GA
Posts: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreyGhost702 View Post
I don't have any experience with the port injection systems, but I'm fairly certain even the 1LE pump won't support both DI & Port Injection on its own. Either beefing up the in-tank setup or running an Aux system is likely necessary.

I think your plan B is the best bet if you're on a strict budget. Would like to see Pistons AND Rods in that plan, though. Rods take quite a beating on PD setups. The OE rods have been proven to be soft, some shops have taken apart engines that hadn't failed but had rods that were tweaked. Though, probably softened up by detonation, which wouldn't happen if there's enough fuel and good fuel. It wouldn't hurt to have some fresh bearings to punish as well. The LT4 system will support some E and that's going to let you make consistent power as well.
1LE fuel pump? I think u mean LT1 fuel pump.
2023TwoSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2025, 08:07 PM   #7
m6-lt1

 
m6-lt1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2023TwoSS View Post
1LE fuel pump? I think u mean LT1 fuel pump.
No he meant 1LE. The SS 1LE has the same in tank fuel pump as the LT4.
__________________
Current: 2023 2SS 1LE

Prior:
2016 Camaro 1SS
2007 Mustang GT
2008 Civic Si
m6-lt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2025, 08:47 PM   #8
Joshinator99
Moderator
 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 6,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saberscar223 View Post
Alot of you have given me really good advice and here are my final options for Engine integrity when adding a Magnesun 2650. My goal is 700-750whp.

Plan A: I add the Magnesun 2650 and too high psi Port Injection and leave internals stock. Since I have a bigger cam as well I'm hoping Id be able to run full E85 on this setup.

Plan B: I add the Magnesun 2650, TSP drop in pistons and the LT4 fueling system and run 93.

Plan C: I just add the Magnesun 2650, keep the boost low and run 93, Ive been told that would be safe with the bigger cam and its also the cheapest option.
Plan A for now but keeping the boost low and the power in the 625-650 WHP range that way your stock bottom end lives. Enjoy the car and continue to save for a real bottom end…then turn it up.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2025, 08:25 AM   #9
Megahurtz
Snackbar Tuning
 
Megahurtz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 SGM ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,513
With the stock LT1 pistons, a 2650 is a waste of money. You would be better off doing an LT4 conversion and keeping boost under 9psi and running some sort of ethanol blend.
__________________
GM Gen V Calibrator
Megahurtz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2025, 10:17 AM   #10
GreyGhost702
 
Drives: 2019 Camaro 1SS1LE
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Utah
Posts: 370
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2023TwoSS View Post
1LE fuel pump? I think u mean LT1 fuel pump.
Quote:
Originally Posted by m6-lt1 View Post
No he meant 1LE. The SS 1LE has the same in tank fuel pump as the LT4.
Exactly. If OP intends to use port injection, the HPFP is more or less irrelevant. The LT1 HPFP is more than enough for driving purposes with any engine/FI combo on any fuel/E blend. The Tank or Aux pumps will be the heavy lifters wherever the DI-PI handoff ends up. But I have no experience with PI/Aux Fueling so maybe there's deeper rules to the base fuel system, but that's how THPSI explained it to me.

I feel for the OP. FI DI cars are money pits. Blowers are expensive. DI fueling is expensive. PI retrofitting is expensive. Compared to any of that, forged internals are cheap! And shit can still go wrong even when you're doing everything right.

The LT4 fuel system is very stout, will support an E blend, and won't break the bank. (~$1600 if he has the LT4 in-tank already) You won't be able to max out a maggie on it, but you pulley right and let it make what it makes safely/consistently. As long as you're doing forged rods & pistons in that build, it's a step in the right direction.

If you're on a mods budget & making a car payment, it's all you're going to think about every time you take the car out. At least forged, you can remember it can withstand an "oops" or two, and it's now built for FI.

Alternatively, sell the SS and buy a ZL1. In terms of costs to modify, you're starting with a better base and a ton of power potential without the need to dig into engine internals to get there, and a fuel system to support most of it. It's also an immediate upgrade over an SS. In terms of car note, clearly the ZL1 is a hefty price tag. But there are a slew of them out there in the $40-50k range and varying milage but under 60k/mi. If the average SS payment was $500/mo, assuming positive equity + cash, a ZL1 would land about $200-$250/mo more.
__________________
2019 1SS1LE M6 Shadow Gray Metallic
ProCharger D1X Race Kit - 4.25" Pulley || GPI Pistons/Rods - ACL Bearings - ARP Hardware || LME Timing Chain Guide || Katech C5R Timing Chain || Katech OE Spec Billet Oil Pump || OE Ported Heads || CHE Trunnion Upgrade || BTR 220 Cam - BTR .660" Dual Springs - GM Racing "Caddy" Lifters - BTR 3/8" Pushrods (7.825") || ATI Balancer || LT4 Injectors || LT4 HPFP || JMS BAP || DSX Flex Fuel || LT2 Intake Manifold || LTH (Catless) || Stainless Works Redline Series NPP || 91 + 8oz Boostane

7/26/2024 Tuning in progress
GreyGhost702 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2025, 10:29 AM   #11
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,561
The 2650 is really overkill until you get north of 800-850whp. Yes it does have superior cooling, but for a 700-750whp power goal, I would find a used ported LT4 blower(put a 2.7 upper with 7" lower), LT4 fuel system and run a E60 blend. You will need a JMS booster for the low side pump. Your stock bottom end with that BTR 225 cam will be fine around 700-750 on E50-60. Jenetty has done a ton of those builds with his own cam. Or put a P1x or ECS setup on it.
__________________

2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.