|
|
#1 |
![]() |
ZL1 Whipple 3.0 blower only?
Hello All,
So I know that you should usually do supporting mods before you put on a new power adder, but I'm wondering if there is any information or anecdote from anyone whose just done a whipple 3.0 and nothing else. I know these are fairly new blowers for the LT platform so I don't really expect that anyone's just put one on their car without modding it in some way first. Whipple rates the kit at 775/735 crank on 93 which seems like pretty good gains, and you can get the ZL1 kit for 6.6k. I know FBO/E85 is more cost effective, just curious about thoughts of just bolting on the Whipple? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Having FUN in the SUN...
![]() Drives: 2022 M6 ZL1 1LE Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 2,178
|
If the end goal was 900+ HP, then I agree.
You can make 775 fly or 660rwhp for MUCH less than $6.6k Depends on your long term goals. If all you wanted was 660rwhp, you can get there for 1/2 that price.
__________________
2022 M6 ZLE: GMS Stage.III KONG X.PORT Package + DMS Lid + GMS Rear Bumper Belly Pan + GMS Hood Bracket + GMS Flex Fuel Package + MONSTER Triple S Clutch + XDI.50% Injectors + CLICK FOR BUILD LIST or www.GRIFFIN-MOTORSPORTS.com = 915rwhp 850rwtq + E60 + 15psi
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,338
|
Quote:
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Petro-sexual
|
Don't know if you're including porting the 1.7 in your FBO, but if not - that's an option, too. There are examples here of a race-ported 1.7 with mostly FBOs getting right to, and past 700 WHP. That's about equivalent to what Whipple quotes. And - as Josh' already pointed out, you don't get cooling improvements with the 1.7, so if that's a consideration, I think the Whipple is a contender, even with the big $$$. And - as Josh' pointed out - you have more headroom, if that's where you want to go.
I'm not sure about Whipple's canned tunes, but I would definitely look at some of the guys you see here, if nothing else. That will get you the most out of your combination, wherever you end up.
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() |
Wheels/suspension/cooling are going to be my first set of mods for the car. After I get track time and can save up I plan to do fbo+e85+ cam, and then probably a blower. I've always wanted a big blower on a car and the new whipples seem to be great superchargers; wish magnuson had any update on the 3100 though because if that ever comes to it sounds like it would be a really cool blower. For me it's not so much about the power number itself, just wana do things to my dream car that I've always wanted to do. I know you dont need a bigger blower for my power goals either but again, just always wanted one haha. Definitely enjoying my ZL1 first though before I do anything; got it through carmax and have an extended warranty so hoping that if I beat on it and something goes it goes before I start breaking into the engine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,338
|
Quote:
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,338
|
The front intercooler is not as consequential since the mass of the water buys you some leeway during a 1/4 mile pull, although you want to upgrade those as well. It’s the brick sizing that really matters.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '20 ZLE Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 4,192
|
Quote:
__________________
2020 ZL1LE A10.
LME LT4 390 short block, LME CID Heads, Kong E2650, FBO. 15" conversion, MT ET Street R 325/15. 100 octane: 1045hp/1055tq. 100 octane + Meth (1x10+): 1117 hp/1067 tq |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,338
|
Honestly, we don’t know the answer to that yet as no one has pushed one hard enough yet. But for what it’s worth, my car makes the same power as yours at a pretty low blower RPM and the cooling is still on point. As soon as I can get my hands on DSX port or maybe the Goliath HPFP, I’ll turn it up and see what it can really do.
If I were in your shoes I’d just meth your Eddie 2650 and push it a tick harder.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '20 ZLE Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 4,192
|
This what we're discussing
__________________
2020 ZL1LE A10.
LME LT4 390 short block, LME CID Heads, Kong E2650, FBO. 15" conversion, MT ET Street R 325/15. 100 octane: 1045hp/1055tq. 100 octane + Meth (1x10+): 1117 hp/1067 tq |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Petro-sexual
|
Quote:
It just feels like there's something not optimal with the 3100. When it was first announced, I was told I could actually do an upgrade (to an extent), and because I have a 3-piece blower case (newer ones are 1-piece), I would only have to swap the rotor housing and upgrade to 1" intercooler lines, and transfer everything else over. It seems like the 3100 has stalled - maybe because it's just not making the power improvements that were expected. You haven't really mentioned 2650s - only Whipple 3.0s, so I'll keep comments around that
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,338
|
Quote:
This will be controversial for some so I’ll zip up my flame suit LOL… but I believe the Whipple 3.0 to be more efficient than the Maggie 2650 so far. Most comparisons show them making similar power (700-1000 WHP comparisons) but with the Whipple being able to spin a solid 10% slower…which makes sense since the Whipple 3.0 is 10% bigger. So the BIG question is: what will happen if the 3.0 is pushed HARD, like Jason’s car. And until someone does, his Maggie 2650 is king of the hill. But we can have fun chasing him…maybe not my bank account so much though!
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|