|
|
#1 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,665
|
Word is don't waste your money on the LT2 manifold
Just sharing info...no dog in this hunt.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,794
|
Yeah his info on that intake is a head scratcher from the start. I’ll say this, I wouldn’t port the lt2.
The ports are good out of the box, I wouldn’t touch it. If he’s taking a lot of material out like porting a lt1, thatll make it lose power. So to me, the real comparison is a pray ported LT1 vs a stock LT2 with only a ported snout to match the 95mm. I’ll take the stock LT2 all day. The reason I say this, is my track numbers match gpi dyno number gains. GM has published the results of the lt2 vs the lt1. I really question a lot from those shops these days unfortunately
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Drives: 22 LT1 Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: DE
Posts: 323
|
Lt2 is easy small economical gain in hp. Especially if you clearance it and add brake booster yourself. I got back to back data on same road and similar air. It was worth a tenth and 1.5mph on my stock car. No tune
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: US
Posts: 3,794
|
Yep
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Drives: 2021 1SS 1LE Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: 98548
Posts: 637
|
For my needs, it worked amazing. I needed more power over 5800 and it delivered for road course work. Data doesn’t lie…
Red is LT2
__________________
Follow my build - https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=594295
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() Drives: 22 LT1 Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: DE
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
If you want to sell that prey ported lt1 lmk. I went with a Procharger and had to switch back to the stock intake (lt2 won’t clear the lt4 hpfp). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 Camaro 1LE Shock Candy Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Garage
Posts: 1,798
|
I tried it and my take away if you can’t afford the MSD go with the LT2. If GPI test result are accurate then I say the LT2 is worth its money for a budget minded person. Plus the look of the LT2 with cover is way better looking than the stock LT1 in a purely cosmetic point.
I think GPI covers this pretty good. https://youtu.be/bt55yZGEdoE There are mods that are worse or really don’t do anything. So many companies and people port, it’s like dyno runs at different shop always subjectable & and based on how well they do it. Porting makes a difference in high performance builds and not so much in low power builds IMO.
__________________
LT4 1.7 Supercharger snout ported & 100% Meth
103 Katech TB, KATECH Custom Heads, DSX In-line fuel TSP Headers, Spec P Super Twin Clutch, TSP EL C7 CAM Diamond Piston & Manley Rods, Roto Fab Big Gulp BTR Push Rods,LS7 Lifters, ARP, FI Chiller, Kirkey Seats SJM Line Lock, Hurst Pistol Grip. 747/739 RWHP street tune - 821/794 RWHP track tune 101 octane. 2014 Mini Cooper countryman S All4 M6 daily driver Last edited by BlackbeastSS2; 05-21-2023 at 05:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: like an old lady Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: indiana
Posts: 2,485
|
i went from a pray ported lt1 to a stock lt2 with a stock tb on both. the car picked up 1.5+ mph. no changes to the tune.
__________________
2016+ camaro: everyone’s first car
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Drives: 2010 camaro Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Colorado
Posts: 225
|
lt2 manifold makes more power than lt1 manifold! It may not be better than msd, but its a improvement over lt1. its why the c8 has it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 camaro Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Colorado
Posts: 225
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,665
|
I am not saying it's not worth it. I have seen plenty of folks report gains with it over the years. I just think it's funny and had to share since it's slow in here.
If you want my opinion, I think Brett is over the "bolt-on" game and has focused his business model on selling parts that support growth and higher dollar packages. More money spent per customer. So this is just a marketing ploy to get folks to buy an MSD or Highram because in the end they better support a Heads/Cam and/or larger cube setup.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 Camaro Z-28 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,512
|
Manifolds
Ok Boys well I have had a three typical combos as far as manifolds go. The STOCK LT1 manifold ran out of steam around 5800 RPM. When I switched to a LT2 manifold , it moved the power band up to roughly 6200 RPM and about 15 MORE HP. Now porting the LT2 manifold did virtually NOTHING so I dont reccommend that.
My last variation was an MSD manifold because I put in a 419 stroker motor with a fairly large cam (GPT NFT cam) and I felt like it needed MORE air . Porting THIS manifold also showed very small gains. So with THIS combo, peak power is about 6500 RPM (roughtly 580 RWHP) with stock converter and A10 tranny. Car is a beast on a road course where RPM RARELY falls below 4800-5000 RPM.
__________________
__________________________________________
2019 SS 1LE BIG NA A10 Eagles Canyon Raceway 2.7 CCW Below https://youtu.be/c9M5UHDftcA 4-15-23 at SCCA TT U1 Class MEGA Thread on THIS car: https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=602092 Retired Cars BELOW: 1973 Camaro, 1969 Camaro, 1969 Camaro SS RS 2010 Camaro SS with 1000HP F1R, 2019 ZL1 1LE A10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 Camaro Z-28 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,512
|
Manifolds
Ok Boys well I have had a three typical combos as far as manifolds go. The STOCK LT1 manifold ran out of steam around 5800 RPM. When I switched to a LT2 manifold , it moved the power band up to roughly 6200 RPM and about 15 MORE HP. Now porting the LT2 manifold did virtually NOTHING so I dont reccommend that.
My last variation was an MSD manifold because I put in a LME 416 stroker motor with a fairly large cam (GPT NFT cam) and I felt like it needed MORE air . Porting THIS manifold also showed very small gains. So with THIS combo, peak power is about 6500 RPM (roughtly 580 RWHP) with stock converter and A10 tranny. Car is a beast on a road course where RPM RARELY falls below 4800-5000 RPM.
__________________
__________________________________________
2019 SS 1LE BIG NA A10 Eagles Canyon Raceway 2.7 CCW Below https://youtu.be/c9M5UHDftcA 4-15-23 at SCCA TT U1 Class MEGA Thread on THIS car: https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=602092 Retired Cars BELOW: 1973 Camaro, 1969 Camaro, 1969 Camaro SS RS 2010 Camaro SS with 1000HP F1R, 2019 ZL1 1LE A10 Last edited by sr71bb; 05-22-2023 at 12:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
![]() Drives: Chevy Camaro Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: IN
Posts: 291
|
Quote:
__________________
'20 Camaro LT1
Twin 67/62 turbo 401(L8t) Texas speed forged piston & rod, BTR stg1 turbo cam, holley ultra lo, port injection, circle d 3600 stall, et street r’s on racestar recluse wheels. 1.33 3.75 5.75@122.98 1/8 pb 9.04@141 1/4 pb technically '94 Camaro Z28 6mt cc306 cam, 4:10's, longtubes with x pipe, otr intake |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|