|
|
#15 | |
![]() Drives: 2016 2SS Convertible Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 587
|
Quote:
__________________
2016 2SS Convertible
Hyper Blue/Ash Gray A8 Magnetic Ride Control Dual Mode Exhaust 2019+ version Split Spoke Silver Wheels Navigation Silver Rally Stripes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: 2SS M6 Hot Wheels #515 Join Date: May 2020
Location: Virginia
Posts: 132
|
A Rotofab intake was already installed when I baselined my car which was 400rwhp.
I had a Solar 87mm ported TB, Kooks headers / green cats, MSD wires and new plugs, a flex fuel system and the requisite tuning. This was all on a local shop's mustang dyno: On 93 Octane the car made 429rwhp. On E85 the car made 460rhwp. I kept the stock NPP muffler as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 13,449
|
Whatever...
it's in my signature anyway.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle Terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune 1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18 3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18 3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18 4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18 4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18 5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS & '99 Camaro Z28 Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,975
|
They just used a regular AC Delco sensor for mine:
ACDelco Part Number: 13507129 https://www.summitracing.com/parts/ado-13507129 And this wiring harness: ACDelco Part Number: 23153101 https://www.gmpartsdirect.com/oem-pa...rness-23153101 |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2020 Camaro 2SS A10 Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Here
Posts: 1,841
|
Quote:
My tune yielded almost 85hp increase at the crank from stock. Minus 15%+ parasitic loss. 72.25 hp gain at best at the wheels. Which means at worst my car would have baselined for ~387 rwhp without mods or if we factor 50 hp like you stated, then 400-410 hp baseline before mods (making it a unicorn from the factory which is statistically rare) It is a safer bet to assume you do not own a unicorn, as most of our cars baseline between 390-400 a majority of the time, with a few outliers, highest I know of is 419 rwhp from the factory, which is ultra uber rare as I've never found anyone else making that claim. In which case your gains are closer to 30-40 rwhp gain in retrospect with all of the same mods you and I have.
__________________
2020 Camaro 2SS A10 | Rebuilt by: CBI Street Cars | 2" SE LT Headers | 3" SE X-Pipe | 3" MBRP Axle-Back | Pri & Sec Cat Deletes | Roto-Fab CAI | LT2 Ported | 95mm ZR1 TB | LSA crankshaft conversion w/modified crank gear | LS1 thrust bearing | Gen V Hinson Plug Wire Set | BTR 220 Stage I Cam | ARP Rod Bolts | Delphi Lifter set | NGK LTR6IX-11 spark plug set | DOD Delete | VVT Limiter | ECM, TCM & E85 | Retuned by: Justin L. | Dyno: 510 rwhp 472 rwtq | Best 1/4 Time: 11.639
Last edited by FlukeSS; 01-17-2023 at 08:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Drives: 2000 WS6 Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: AZ
Posts: 676
|
I think most stations are selling something close to 50% ethanol now that subsidies are mostly gone? Understand that converting to ethanol means "oversizing" your injector compared to running premium gasoline only. So while you can still run premium gasoline, you will end up "front loading" your injector charge and not atomizing as thoroughly through the entire intake stroke. Not sure how much this decreases performance/efficiency compared to running a regular size non-flexfuel injector on 93 Octane, but something to be aware of. General rule is to run the smallest injector capable of getting the job done. e85 is getting harder to find (for me, anyways), i'd settle for the convenience/efficiency of 93 Octane over compensating for variability/availability of e85. I wish my truck wasn't factory equipped for flex fuel because i think it could get better mpg if it didn't have it. ...but if your intent to run e85 all the time and you have a good local source for it, go for it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Drives: 2018 Camaro SS A8 "Dark Knight" Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 258
|
Michigan station E85 in the summer is close or above the 85% in my neck of the woods (random testing) E85 sensor
__________________
DARK KNIGHT
2018 SS A8 11.37 @ 121.01 GPI Tuned E85 Nitto tires Roto Fab CAI MSD intake |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Texas & Uncle Sam's Choice
Posts: 132
|
In the middle of Texas where I'm at it's about 76% ethanol per my measurements.
The E85 costs vary from $3.25 - $3.95 per gallon.
__________________
2024 Chevrolet 3500HD Z71, LTZ, 4x4, 6.6 ltr. L5P long-bed.
2016 Camaro 2SS Six-speed, Hotchkis sway bars, Eibach .750" drop springs, Mamo throttle body, E85, BMR stuff. 2006 Quicksilver 6-speed GTO ERL LS3-430, All-Pro 285cc heads, 262/273 .758/.742 116+3 cam, Sheet-metal Intake, 70lb Siemens injectors, SLP, GMM Ripshifter, QA1 Coil-overs front and rear, nylon suspension bushings, Hotchkis, RPM Trans, SPEC twin clutch, SpinTech, Kooks 1 7/8 -2.0", BMR drive train, Kaaz 3.91, Lingenfelter CAI, Baer brakes, mini-tubs, E85. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() Drives: 2017 50th Anniversary Camaro 2SS Join Date: Feb 2026
Location: California
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
Q: What horsepower increase will I see? A: Horsepower difference when using Flex Fuel is around 20+ depending on supporting mods or even if you're bone stock. Those saying it doesnt make a difference are either trolling or they have a bad tune. Q: Which brand of Flex Fuel kit should I buy? A: While there are many brands of Flex Fuel kits they all essentially do the same thing. What you're paying for is durability and reliability. Imo DSX has the most well built Flex Fuel kit. It almost looks factory when installed. Additional info: E85 is generally cheaper than your standard octane gasoline. It runs cooler, cleaner, and smells way better too (big help if you're running catless). E85 does get worse economy than octane but its offset by the cheaper price. My personal experience with I didn't see it draining as fast as I thought it would. It last me maybe 1 day less than standard octane. Lastly some other car brands have to have a specific tune for a specific content of E in there tank (E50 or E30 are examples), the nice thing about Flex Fuel kits for Camaros is that it does not matter what content of E is in your tank. It can run on E85 - 91 octane or any level of E in between. For reference standard gas cars can run on E15 MAX, but most gas stations add ~10% E to their mix. The key to anything when modifying cars is the tune you get. The tune is the glue that holds everything together. If you have a bad tune, your car will run the same if not worse than it did before. My tuner got me the most gains and you can't even tell I'm running E (aside the smell). So make sure you do your research and go to a reputable tuner in your area. Don't trust any Joe Shmo with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2020 SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: NorCal
Posts: 898
|
Just ran the numbers (using AI) for my city in California... Since both gas stations are within reasonable range, e85 makes sense for power and cost:
Since fuel economy varies a bit, I will use realistic averages for an LT1 SS: • 91 octane average: 20 mpg • E85 average: 15 mpg (These numbers sit right in the middle of what most owners actually see.) Cost per mile calculation 91 octane at 4.69 per gallon Cost per mile = price per gallon divided by mpg 4.69 ÷ 20 = 0.2345 dollars per mile That is 23.45 cents per mile E85 at 2.94 per gallon 2.94 ÷ 15 = 0.196 dollars per mile That is 19.6 cents per mile Final comparison • 91 octane costs about 23.5 cents per mile • E85 costs about 19.6 cents per mile Even with the lower mpg, the cheaper fuel price means E85 still comes out ahead. You save about 3.9 cents per mile running E85. On 91 octane at 4.69 per gallon Sixteen gallons times 4.69 Total is 75.04 dollars per tank On E85 at 2.94 per gallon Sixteen gallons times 2.94 Total is 47.04 dollars per tank |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Drives: 2023 SS Join Date: Nov 2025
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 131
|
dumb Q....
so E85 requires a larger diameter fuel hose & a larger injector, and therefore a tune. however, the linked ACDelco parts (wires & sensor) and DSX flex fuel kit show a sensor & some wires. can we put that sensor & wire on & just run E85? it seems more complication would be ensuing...... it does STINK when I remote start my car in my garage. E85 might help that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Shelby GT500 Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,714
|
Quote:
__________________
2012 Shelby GT500 with VMP Gen 3R.
Prior: 2023 Camaro 2SS 1LE 2016 Camaro 1SS 2007 Mustang GT 2008 Civic Si |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS Fifty Join Date: Mar 2025
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 49
|
Is there a right or wrong way to run ethanol? Meaning once I get a tune should I just strictly run ethanol? Can I use a mixture of ethanol and 91 octane to get an octane boost yet still get better gas milage? Going back to 91 octane after summer months into the winter OK? Any benefit or harm to using a mix of both? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 2ss 6mt Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,539
|
Quote:
Drivable distance on e85 is much lower than 93. Money removed from your bank account on a tank of e85 if lower than 93. So to truly compare apples to apples, calculate miles per dollar between the 2. I run 93 pretty much all the time. If i have a plan to go to the track i will run my tank out and fill it with e85. But for me, my car is mostly a daily driver. So trying to get the extra power from e85 just incase i need to win a street race would be me trying to hard. And I'm not going to try hard for a street race. E85 doesn't lube the injectors like gas does. That's probably the worst downside to it. It's not something that is a guaranteed failure, just something to be aware of. People run strictly e85 for years with no problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
| Tags |
| flex fuel, horsepower |
|
|