[Umbriel]

Does anyone know which is a better intake or which one would make more power on a boosted car? Twin turbo car to be exact.


Thanks

[ZO6Ted]

Can't answer your question except to say everything I understand about turbos as opposed to blowers through the years. Turbos are not going to care so much so I'd look at the price. Love your build a lot btw!

[Umbriel]

Originally Posted by ZO6Ted

Can't answer your question except to say everything I understand about turbos as opposed to blowers through the years. Turbos are not going to care so much so I'd look at the price. Love your build a lot btw!

Thanks! I already have the Procharger one because there weren't really any other options at the time that had port injection bungs. If it isn't going to matter I'll just keep the Procharger intake.

[SC88]

I recently read that the BTR intake was better but much like you I already have the Procharger intake so it's staying. IMO with Forced Induction intake choice isn't as critical as it would be in a NA build unless you are trying to squeeze every bit of power you can out of the setup.

[Umbriel]

Originally Posted by SC88

I recently read that the BTR intake was better but much like you I already have the Procharger intake so it's staying. IMO with Forced Induction intake choice isn't as critical as it would be in a NA build unless you are trying to squeeze every bit of power you can out of the setup.

If it won't pick up much I'll just keep the Procharger one, I like the way it looks more with the Twin Turbo cover I had made for it.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

[Joshinator99]

Originally Posted by SC88

I recently read that the BTR intake was better but much like you I already have the Procharger intake so it's staying. IMO with Forced Induction intake choice isn't as critical as it would be in a NA build unless you are trying to squeeze every bit of power you can out of the setup.

Agreed. I don’t think it would be a big difference since it’s pressurized as SC88 mentioned.

[turboalb]

You'll be fine with turbo(s) , it will be like a low ram I would expect , should pull to 8k. I've got a ported one on my stock cube f1a94

[Umbriel]

Originally Posted by turboalb

You'll be fine with turbo(s) , it will be like a low ram I would expect , should pull to 8k. I've got a ported one on my stock cube f1a94

Are you saying the Procharger one will be fine?

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

[turboalb]

yes sorry, I missed the email. Single or twins ?

[turboalb]

dyno

[Umbriel]

Originally Posted by turboalb

yes sorry, I missed the email. Single or twins ?

I missed this post somehow, mine is twin 68/71s.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk

[Choda]

Bump. Im making the switch to port. I have a procharger intake already but its not set up for port. So either I send this out to have ports added or I buy a new intake ( likely another procharged w port or BTR Trinity).

Anyone see results from anywhere?

[jlaudio11]

Originally Posted by Choda

Bump. Im making the switch to port. I have a procharger intake already but its not set up for port. So either I send this out to have ports added or I buy a new intake ( likely another procharged w port or BTR Trinity).

Anyone see results from anywhere?

I would say about any manifold would be better than the procharger just looking at it. I have a btr cam in my engine but havent seen that much good results comparing the btr trinity to say a holley high ram. I'm debating between mast's lt2 with port injection or the holley ultra low ram. Engine masters compared the holley ones and the ultra low was better than the low ram, as good as high ram real low, down through the middle and then peaked higher.