|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() Drives: Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: NY
Posts: 855
|
Lower Pulley + Supercharger Coolant Expansion Tank
Spinning the SC faster would obviously generate more heat but I am wondering if after adding a 8% lower pulley (+40HP) if the SC Coolant Expansion tank would offset any gains in IATs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Red Bull
Drives: 2017 Chevy ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 186
|
Are you tracking the car? Or just street/drag strip?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() Drives: Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: NY
Posts: 855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,665
|
Port blower, don't change pulley, will make more boost without spinning harder.
X port and 2.5 makes 12.5 psi @ 6500rpm. Manifold temps don't go above 140 in the summer = No timing pull.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 1LE Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: NY
Posts: 855
|
Quote:
The expansion tanks have shown to be good for another 10*F reduction. I'll probably do that as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 Chevy Camaro ZL1 M6 Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Sea level
Posts: 1,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|