Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-29-2021, 07:53 PM   #71
Z OH 6


 
Drives: 2024 CT5-V Blackwing
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: GA
Posts: 3,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
Yes, it will be much more consistent. Again, you are talking about a stock LT4 blower that has been ported to death and needs E85 and a pulley and all these other additional items to still make less HP than a 2650 will out the box on pump gas. 2650s make 1000 to the wheels and have no cooling issues. The LT4 is strapped and pushed and poked and prodded and stretched to it's limit and you'll barely make 700 RWHP and you'll still potentially have cooling issues.

And to be frank, if you're asking about it at this point then you must already know that the 2650 is the way to go. Consistency, efficiency, potential, future mods, etc. It's the only way to go. Well the Whipple 2.9 is also a great choice if you can find one at a good price. The new Whipple 3.0 looks promising also. But why go thru all the trouble of trying to coax the stock LT4 to do something that the 2650 will do effortlessly? Nobody with a 2650 or 2.9 or any of the aftermarket blowers wish they had just stuck with their stock blower or even think it might have been better to do so.
I already know how you feel, I've read how you feel about the 2650R in every thread that its ever mentioned. I got it, you love the 2650R.
Z OH 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2021, 07:55 PM   #72
Z OH 6


 
Drives: 2024 CT5-V Blackwing
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: GA
Posts: 3,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
Which shop are you gonna entrust to work on your brand new C8 that doesn't have a warranty tho? And then when you bring it to them..."oh this is a rear engine so it requires yada yada and we have to yada yada to access yada yada and the parts are gonna cost X amount and our only mechanic who can work on it is out for 3 weeks and we can't get the parts and this and that and the other"...

I mean come on, we all know how this works. You tune that thing, void the warranty, and you'll be stuck with very few shops that are competent enough or even willing to work on it. And they're not gonna cut you any breaks. You think you're gonna pull in there with a $70K+ minimum brand new C8 and they're gonna NOT take advantage of you? LOL!! Trust me, they'll know that you got no warranty and few options and you'll be nothing but a bag of money in their eyes. $190 oil change and we'll have it done next Tuesday or some other nonsense. Parts with an 80% upcharge just because. Nothing on this car will be cheap or even relatively reasonable if your warranty is voided.

And then when you do find a shop, guess what, they're gonna joyride the hell out of your C8.
Any speed shop that builds these cars will do general maintenance as needed. Nothing is ever cheap if you have to pay out of pocket when your warranty is voided, yet we have so many people that mod cars anyway. We accept the risk.
Z OH 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2021, 07:58 PM   #73
JSH


 
JSH's Avatar
 
Drives: '20 ZLE
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 4,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z OH 6 View Post
I got it, you love the 2650R.
Clearly. There are former Maggie employees here, perhaps Blaq is one
__________________
2020 ZL1LE A10.
LME LT4 390 short block, LME CID Heads, Kong E2650, FBO.
15" conversion, MT ET Street R 325/15.
100 octane: 1045hp/1055tq.
100 octane + Meth (1x10+): 1117 hp/1067 tq
JSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2021, 07:59 PM   #74
Camaro1973

 
Camaro1973's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 ZL1
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z OH 6 View Post
I already know how you feel, I've read how you feel about the 2650R in every thread that its ever mentioned. I got it, you love the 2650R.

What's funny is... he has a whipple


__________________
928rwhp - 93 | 1040rwhp/898rwrq - E65 SAE

LME 377 LT4 Short Block | Magnuson 2650 80mm upper w/13% lower (9.06) | DSX Lid & Valve Covers | CSP Custom Cam w/32% fuel lobe | CID Heads | NW 103mm TB | Roto Fab Big Gulp | CSP 2" Headers w/Green GESI Gen 2 Cats | Borla 3" Full Cat Back w/ S-Type| Mighty Mouse Wild Catch Can| Custom Holley Low side Fuel system| TooHigh PSI Port Injection w/Holley Controller | Forced Inductions Interchiller w/2 gallon fender tank | TK Performance built 10L90
Camaro1973 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2021, 08:04 PM   #75
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by laynlo15 View Post
Just in case someone thought I was BSing about the 2650 for the C8.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=39...58&ref=sharing
If they are tuning it through the factory ECU then I am on board.
__________________

2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2021, 09:12 PM   #76
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
It's not that I love the 2650. It's more that I'm not a fan of pushing the stock blower. And many of us have commented on every comparison thread. Maybe I'm just more outspoken or I stand out more.

It's not really about the blower so much as it's about the potential and capabilities. The aftermarket blowers are just flat out better. Now if this was a Hellcat forum then I'd say keep the stock blower until you're looking to make quad RWHP numbers. 700, 800, 900 RWHP and the stock Hellcat blower, cam, and heads are fine. I wouldn't even consider a 2650 or anything at those levels. But with the ZL1 you need to upgrade. Or you'll be pushing the stock blower, it'll be inefficient, it'll have cooling issues, and you'll barely make 700 for all your efforts.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2021, 09:33 PM   #77
CW3SF

 
CW3SF's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 Chevy Camaro ZL1 M6
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Sea level
Posts: 1,276
I still don’t see a problem with 700whp on stock pulleys and no cooling issues. E85 ftw.
CW3SF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2021, 11:47 PM   #78
BlaqWhole
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by CW3SF View Post
I still don’t see a problem with 700whp on stock pulleys and no cooling issues. E85 ftw.
Many others have had cooling issues. So maybe you just got lucky or you actually are having issues and don't wanna admit it or you don't know you're having issues.

So here's the thing. OP asked a simple question. Or rather, 3 simple questions. Yet when I answered him it seems like some people don't like the answer. So do people want an answer or do they just want someone to tell them what they want to hear. Because I can do either of those.


1. At the same boost level, is it even noticeable?

No. It is not noticeable. If that is what you want to hear.

2. With the improved cooling from the 2650R does it help at all for casual driving?

No. Not at all. If that is what you want to hear.

3. Is there any perceived loss of power due to the larger blower rotors at part throttle when not under boost?

Yes. If that is what you want to hear.


Now in my experience, nobody asks a question about a blower setup unless for some reason they are unsure of their own particular setup. I'm not asking anyone if the 2650 is superior to what I have (Whipple 2.9) because I know for a GD fact that the 2650 IS indeed better. Not a question or doubt about it. However, the 2.9 that I have is enough to exceed my needs...for now. When I get to the point that I max the 2.9, then the 2650 would be no better and I'll most likely be switching to something superior than both. But OP is asking about the 2650 in comparison to his setup because to me it is obvious that he has doubts about his system. Either that or he is experiencing some issues with his. Or perhaps he is considering switching. Because there would be no other logical reason to start an entire post about this when this has been debated and discussed many times. So color me taken aback kinda sorta.

So now, is the stock blower capable of 700 RWHP? Yes. Can it do so efficiently? Yes depending on many factors and many ancillary and supplementary parts. Will it have cooling issues? Maybe. Maybe not. Depends on many factors. Will you be satisfied with it? Well if you're asking about the 2650 then I would assume you're not satisfied.

Is the 2650 or 2.9 better? Yes. Hands down. At any HP level, at partial throttle, at full throttle, max boost, boost per boost, max potential, in every possible way they are better. Not one person has said "hey let me ditch the 2650 and go back to the stock blower". Does any of this mean the stock blower is trash? No.

So take what you want from it. I don't care. If money is no object then go with a full build and get it all done in one shot. If money is an issue then do what your budget allows and be satisfied. If you just want a slightly above stock HP and you will be satisfied then do whatever you want. End of the day, your car, your money, your choice.
BlaqWhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2021, 05:25 AM   #79
EDFHOBBIES
Dyno Show Queen LOL
 
EDFHOBBIES's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 SS & 17 ZL1 Both Yellow
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,354
Send a message via Skype™ to EDFHOBBIES
Quote:
Originally Posted by laynlo15 View Post
Just in case someone thought I was BSing about the 2650 for the C8.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=39...58&ref=sharing
https://www.facebook.com/610210601/p...5948179860602/

Here's the controller needed for the c8 for tuning so I guess that's why lpe teamed up w maggi. Looks like peitz's kit use there stuff.

If I remember correctly Emilia had engine troubles at 660 hp and the kit makes 700
__________________


Kong Ported 2650, Crawford Racing Port Injection, Weapon X 112mm Adapter, NW112mm TB, Livernois Ported LT4 Heads, Lingenfelter GT32 stealth cam, Haltech Elite, and Carbon by Trufiber

Last edited by EDFHOBBIES; 10-30-2021 at 06:40 AM.
EDFHOBBIES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2021, 06:29 AM   #80
Z OH 6


 
Drives: 2024 CT5-V Blackwing
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: GA
Posts: 3,557
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlaqWhole View Post
It's not that I love the 2650. It's more that I'm not a fan of pushing the stock blower. And many of us have commented on every comparison thread. Maybe I'm just more outspoken or I stand out more.

It's not really about the blower so much as it's about the potential and capabilities. The aftermarket blowers are just flat out better. Now if this was a Hellcat forum then I'd say keep the stock blower until you're looking to make quad RWHP numbers. 700, 800, 900 RWHP and the stock Hellcat blower, cam, and heads are fine. I wouldn't even consider a 2650 or anything at those levels. But with the ZL1 you need to upgrade. Or you'll be pushing the stock blower, it'll be inefficient, it'll have cooling issues, and you'll barely make 700 for all your efforts.
The stock blower has been shown to make over 900whp when ported in extreme builds, I won't argue the 2650R is a better way to get there but there's a C7 Z06 running 8.6 on the stock ported blower and there's a ZL1 running 8.9 on the stock ported blower so clearly they're capable of much more than you're giving them credit for.
Z OH 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2021, 06:58 AM   #81
EDFHOBBIES
Dyno Show Queen LOL
 
EDFHOBBIES's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 SS & 17 ZL1 Both Yellow
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,354
Send a message via Skype™ to EDFHOBBIES
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z OH 6 View Post
The stock blower has been shown to make over 900whp when ported in extreme builds, I won't argue the 2650R is a better way to get there but there's a C7 Z06 running 8.6 on the stock ported blower and there's a ZL1 running 8.9 on the stock ported blower so clearly they're capable of much more than you're giving them credit for.
I think the majority think by the time you spend the money to reach the power level say 800 rwhp you would of spent just as much as buying the 2650 . Also the convince of using 93 vs messing around w a meth is nice.

Blower porting $1300 to 1500
Heat exchanger $400 to 1000
Grip tech 2.10 or 2.30 $200
Extra capacity tank 700 to 1600 or chiller setup $1400+
Meth kit $1000+
Lower pulley ATI or I.W. $600+
Dsx flex kit $300

VS

Maggi $7000
$-1800 sale of blower

Pretty simple
__________________


Kong Ported 2650, Crawford Racing Port Injection, Weapon X 112mm Adapter, NW112mm TB, Livernois Ported LT4 Heads, Lingenfelter GT32 stealth cam, Haltech Elite, and Carbon by Trufiber
EDFHOBBIES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2021, 08:00 AM   #82
laynlo15
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDFHOBBIES View Post
I think the majority think by the time you spend the money to reach the power level say 800 rwhp you would of spent just as much as buying the 2650 . Also the convince of using 93 vs messing around w a meth is nice.

Blower porting $1300 to 1500
Heat exchanger $400 to 1000
Grip tech 2.10 or 2.30 $200
Extra capacity tank 700 to 1600 or chiller setup $1400+
Meth kit $1000+
Lower pulley ATI or I.W. $600+
Dsx flex kit $300

VS

Maggi $7000
$-1800 sale of blower

Pretty simple
Agree with you sir
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2021, 08:22 AM   #83
Evansa22

 
Evansa22's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 HBM ZLE
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: In the garage
Posts: 891
Q[QUOTE=EDFHOBBIES;11090720]I think the majority think by the time you spend the money to reach the power level say 800 rwhp you would of spent just as much as buying the 2650 . Also the convince of using 93 vs messing around w a meth is nice.

Blower porting $1300 to 1500
Heat exchanger $400 to 1000
Grip tech 2.10 or 2.30 $200
Extra capacity tank 700 to 1600 or chiller setup $1400+
Meth kit $1000+
Lower pulley ATI or I.W. $600+
Dsx flex kit $300

VS

Maggi $7000
$-1800 sale of blower

Pretty simple


Unless your using meth i don't believe its possible to get to 800rwhp with either blower. High side falls off and you will either need meth, cam, or port injection to get there from my experience. Don't think you get much passed 700 rwhp with stock high side. If you have another way I'd be interested to hear
Evansa22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2021, 08:22 AM   #84
CW3SF

 
CW3SF's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 Chevy Camaro ZL1 M6
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Sea level
Posts: 1,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDFHOBBIES View Post
I think the majority think by the time you spend the money to reach the power level say 800 rwhp you would of spent just as much as buying the 2650 . Also the convince of using 93 vs messing around w a meth is nice.

Blower porting $1300 to 1500
Heat exchanger $400 to 1000
Grip tech 2.10 or 2.30 $200
Extra capacity tank 700 to 1600 or chiller setup $1400+
Meth kit $1000+
Lower pulley ATI or I.W. $600+
Dsx flex kit $300

VS

Maggi $7000
$-1800 sale of blower

Pretty simple
I totally get that the 2650 is a better setup. No one is saying it isn’t. But I don’t agree with this cost comparison. It’s not that cut and dry. I’d still want all of the mods that I have on my stock blower with the 2650 except for the $1500 porting (headers, exhaust, TB, CAI, flex fuel, fuel system, cooling system, etc). I’d never ever drop a 2650 on it and stop there. That would be pointless when I can make the same 700whp and run as cool as stock with my stock blower and my cooling mods.

So the comparison for me is $1500 vs $7000. I may do a 2650 someday. But I’m doing all of these accompanying mods on my stock blower first. I don’t care if I’m spending more over the life of my car. I’m enjoying the process and that’s my choice. My money and my car lol.
CW3SF is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.