|
|
#29 | |
![]() Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
|
Quote:
Last edited by FoundNemo; 08-12-2021 at 06:08 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Drives: camaro Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Uranus
Posts: 127
|
You will enjoy the maggie setup. I tried the 80mm blower pulley but ran out of fuel at 4krpm But it made over 740 FPTQ would have been over 800rwhp if I had the fuel. Boost Psi was 21 with the 80mm.
__________________
-2000 camaro ss Lsx 427 Tf245 6 bolt Twin turbs. - 2015 C7 zo6 halltec Pulley headers- 2018 Zl1 a10 2650 maggie CSP headers big gulp 103mm
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
|
More sound clips added to the other thread, including 3rd gear WOT roll on:
https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=595879 |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NH
Posts: 1,713
|
Supercharger displaces x amount of air per revolution, and spinning it at y rpm means that z amount of air is being displaced. You are focusing on the wrong thing here with boost pressure, because it's a by product. Note how the 'boost' number on this car changed with the headers and exhaust mods, with no pulley change, and it would likely change again with porting or a different camshaft. What really matters is how much air the supercharger is pushing, because that additional air allows additional fuel to be burned, which is the reason for the supercharger in the first place. Not disputing that adding an overdrive pulley on the blower should increase power, just was pointing out that installing it would not honestly be restoring anything, it would really just be an additional mod.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2024 CT5-V Blackwing Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: GA
Posts: 3,516
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
![]() Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Petro-sexual
|
Less boost and same-to-better-power is more efficiency, which seems reasonable with LTs, like it looks like you're seeing. I am a little lost on everything, but if the changing the tires placement on the dyno drums differently can change readings, too, from what I recall (among other things, too). If that's the case, that could account for differences in expectations of gains, but opening that exhaust will help make more power down the line, so all is good. I doubt the lower-than-expected gains have anything to do with the headers themselves.
This is a great start to a 2650. You'll be out of fuel before you know it, HAHAHA.
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
![]() Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
|
So the reason the numbers are lower is that total timing is capped at 21 for the target to be conservative. There is more on the table if 24 were to be used like stock. Reviewed the tune file in detail. So 20whp and 20 to 40rwtq, less boost on 21 degrees of peak timing on 93 octane. Makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,583
|
If anything Smaller wheels and tires could help numbers if the the new setup is lighter. Drag radials will lower numbers.
Boost is just a measure of restriction. Less boost doesn't mean less power if flow was increased. The Supercharger is still spinning the same RPM. It bet it don't gain much more power on 24 degrees vs 21(at least on 93 octane). Stock timing map is pretty aggressive on the LT4 stuff and I have read reports of some making more power with less timing. Don't know first hand being I haven't directly compared it. I have my brothers C7Z targeting 21 degrees but it's higher compression on E. Either way it gained about what it should for Catted headers.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,276
|
Quote:
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
![]() Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
|
I agree with you and KingLT1. Wont be increasing timing as there is no point. The goal is prep for the Maggie, not maximize headers install only for his car so we'll leave as is for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|