Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-11-2021, 05:31 PM   #29
FoundNemo
 
Drives: 2019 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnta1ss View Post
I keep seeing this stuff on the forum about losing boost. You seem to understand that less restriction can produce lower 'boost' numbers, good so far. But why would you think that he needs to now speed up the blower to find out what these headers and the tune and the lid and the crimp delete and the axleback were worth? The blower is still spinning the same rpm as it did before, which means pushing the same amount of air as before, so therefore nothing was actually lost with the blower. So the real gain from all this $$$$ was indeed just 19.9 STD hp.
At lower boost yes. I didnt say supercharger rpm was lower, i said lower pressure. Up the pressure back to stock and more power, at higher rpms.

Last edited by FoundNemo; 08-12-2021 at 06:08 AM.
FoundNemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2021, 07:52 PM   #30
Rodslnger
 
Rodslnger's Avatar
 
Drives: camaro
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Uranus
Posts: 127
You will enjoy the maggie setup. I tried the 80mm blower pulley but ran out of fuel at 4krpm But it made over 740 FPTQ would have been over 800rwhp if I had the fuel. Boost Psi was 21 with the 80mm.
__________________
-2000 camaro ss Lsx 427 Tf245 6 bolt Twin turbs. - 2015 C7 zo6 halltec Pulley headers- 2018 Zl1 a10 2650 maggie CSP headers big gulp 103mm
Rodslnger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2021, 03:31 AM   #31
FoundNemo
 
Drives: 2019 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodslnger View Post
You will enjoy the maggie setup. I tried the 80mm blower pulley but ran out of fuel at 4krpm But it made over 740 FPTQ would have been over 800rwhp if I had the fuel. Boost Psi was 21 with the 80mm.
Cheers sounds epic!
FoundNemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2021, 06:12 AM   #32
FoundNemo
 
Drives: 2019 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
More sound clips added to the other thread, including 3rd gear WOT roll on:

https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=595879
FoundNemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2021, 06:39 AM   #33
wnta1ss

 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NH
Posts: 1,713
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoundNemo View Post
At lower boost yes. I didnt say supercharger rpm was lower, i said lower pressure. Up the pressure back to stock and more power, at higher rpms.
Supercharger displaces x amount of air per revolution, and spinning it at y rpm means that z amount of air is being displaced. You are focusing on the wrong thing here with boost pressure, because it's a by product. Note how the 'boost' number on this car changed with the headers and exhaust mods, with no pulley change, and it would likely change again with porting or a different camshaft. What really matters is how much air the supercharger is pushing, because that additional air allows additional fuel to be burned, which is the reason for the supercharger in the first place. Not disputing that adding an overdrive pulley on the blower should increase power, just was pointing out that installing it would not honestly be restoring anything, it would really just be an additional mod.
wnta1ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2021, 07:00 AM   #34
Z OH 6


 
Drives: 2024 CT5-V Blackwing
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: GA
Posts: 3,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnta1ss View Post
Supercharger displaces x amount of air per revolution, and spinning it at y rpm means that z amount of air is being displaced. You are focusing on the wrong thing here with boost pressure, because it's a by product. Note how the 'boost' number on this car changed with the headers and exhaust mods, with no pulley change, and it would likely change again with porting or a different camshaft. What really matters is how much air the supercharger is pushing, because that additional air allows additional fuel to be burned, which is the reason for the supercharger in the first place. Not disputing that adding an overdrive pulley on the blower should increase power, just was pointing out that installing it would not honestly be restoring anything, it would really just be an additional mod.
Good explanation, a good example is when I had my Hellcat, it made 854whp with a 2.65 upper blower pulley, then I had the blower ported and changed to a 2.85 pulley would have normally been a 40whp drop, but I actually gained around 80whp and ended up at 892whp without having to spin the blower as hard because the blower was so much more efficient after the porting.
Z OH 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2021, 07:06 AM   #35
FoundNemo
 
Drives: 2019 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by wnta1ss View Post
Supercharger displaces x amount of air per revolution, and spinning it at y rpm means that z amount of air is being displaced. You are focusing on the wrong thing here with boost pressure, because it's a by product. Note how the 'boost' number on this car changed with the headers and exhaust mods, with no pulley change, and it would likely change again with porting or a different camshaft. What really matters is how much air the supercharger is pushing, because that additional air allows additional fuel to be burned, which is the reason for the supercharger in the first place. Not disputing that adding an overdrive pulley on the blower should increase power, just was pointing out that installing it would not honestly be restoring anything, it would really just be an additional mod.
Doesnt matter really anywho what it made, its a prep mod for the Maggie.
FoundNemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2021, 07:39 AM   #36
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,820
Less boost and same-to-better-power is more efficiency, which seems reasonable with LTs, like it looks like you're seeing. I am a little lost on everything, but if the changing the tires placement on the dyno drums differently can change readings, too, from what I recall (among other things, too). If that's the case, that could account for differences in expectations of gains, but opening that exhaust will help make more power down the line, so all is good. I doubt the lower-than-expected gains have anything to do with the headers themselves.

This is a great start to a 2650. You'll be out of fuel before you know it, HAHAHA.
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2021, 09:01 AM   #37
FoundNemo
 
Drives: 2019 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz28 View Post
Less boost and same-to-better-power is more efficiency, which seems reasonable with LTs, like it looks like you're seeing. I am a little lost on everything, but if the changing the tires placement on the dyno drums differently can change readings, too, from what I recall (among other things, too). If that's the case, that could account for differences in expectations of gains, but opening that exhaust will help make more power down the line, so all is good. I doubt the lower-than-expected gains have anything to do with the headers themselves.

This is a great start to a 2650. You'll be out of fuel before you know it, HAHAHA.
Fuellll gahhh lol
FoundNemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2021, 10:04 AM   #38
FoundNemo
 
Drives: 2019 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
So the reason the numbers are lower is that total timing is capped at 21 for the target to be conservative. There is more on the table if 24 were to be used like stock. Reviewed the tune file in detail. So 20whp and 20 to 40rwtq, less boost on 21 degrees of peak timing on 93 octane. Makes sense.
FoundNemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2021, 10:18 AM   #39
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,583
If anything Smaller wheels and tires could help numbers if the the new setup is lighter. Drag radials will lower numbers.

Boost is just a measure of restriction. Less boost doesn't mean less power if flow was increased. The Supercharger is still spinning the same RPM.

It bet it don't gain much more power on 24 degrees vs 21(at least on 93 octane). Stock timing map is pretty aggressive on the LT4 stuff and I have read reports of some making more power with less timing. Don't know first hand being I haven't directly compared it.

I have my brothers C7Z targeting 21 degrees but it's higher compression on E.

Either way it gained about what it should for Catted headers.
__________________

2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2021, 08:17 PM   #40
Joshinator99
Moderator
 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,276
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
If anything Smaller wheels and tires could help numbers if the the new setup is lighter. Drag radials will lower numbers.

Boost is just a measure of restriction. Less boost doesn't mean less power if flow was increased. The Supercharger is still spinning the same RPM.

It bet it don't gain much more power on 24 degrees vs 21(at least on 93 octane). Stock timing map is pretty aggressive on the LT4 stuff and I have read reports of some making more power with less timing. Don't know first hand being I haven't directly compared it.

I have my brothers C7Z targeting 21 degrees but it's higher compression on E.

Either way it gained about what it should for Catted headers.
Agreed. I don’t think 93 octane will want 24 degrees, I’d bet money you would start knocking and actually lose power. Being able to run E50 or so would be a different story.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2021, 05:38 AM   #41
FoundNemo
 
Drives: 2019 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: GA
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshinator99 View Post
Agreed. I don’t think 93 octane will want 24 degrees, I’d bet money you would start knocking and actually lose power. Being able to run E50 or so would be a different story.
I agree with you and KingLT1. Wont be increasing timing as there is no point. The goal is prep for the Maggie, not maximize headers install only for his car so we'll leave as is for now.
FoundNemo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.