|
|
#15 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NH
Posts: 1,713
|
Ok, so the car was faster with headers than it had been with cat deletes, not slower. As I said, I think the 7-hp-loss-with-headers that NA18CamaroSS reported does not make any sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,666
|
I wasn't arguing. I was agreeing that in almost all cases Headers normally show an improvement. I don't think a half a second improvement is normal either. I should have quoted Greg.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,882
|
Its not and can't tell you why or how it happened. Same dyno, same track similar temps and DA. I was hoping for a couple tenths and shocked it went that fast with me tuning it also. Haha Just some how the right combo that worked well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|