|
|
#29 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,561
|
Quote:
Exactly
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Drives: 2019 Satin Steel ZL1 1LE Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Mount Juliet, TN
Posts: 49
|
"For those 9 seconds or less..."
Can't believe nobody has posted this yet! Great job OP! -Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
Two Lane Blacktop
Drives: '18 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Black River, NNY
Posts: 516
|
Quote:
Getting the win, would or could come down to reaction time at the light. A slower car can win by just leaving a little quicker in thousands of second. A lot more can happen in the 1320 feet, but that’s the simple version. The car in question, owned by JLS, can only get faster and quicker. His goal was a 9 second street based NA car, which is quite the accomplishment in any car. Last edited by Paintslinger16; 07-20-2020 at 04:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 ZL1 Riverside Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,139
|
Quote:
How many Audi RS3 guys are running 9s at 30+ psi? But what they don't tell you is how often the motor needs a "refresh" Anyway, everyone has their priorities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,561
|
Quote:
Aside from that, I already know for a fact that with the remaining 6-8k left before I am at the price of a low mileage used ZL1, I can do drop-in pistons/rods and drive shaft/axles. Does it mean my car is a ZL1, No but that wasn't the point. And No the LT4 isn't exactly ready for 1000hp in stock form depending on the power adder if we are now using 75k miles and 90% compression or greater as requirement to qualify for your testing standards. Unfortunately the LT1/4 engines suffer from a shit half thrust bearing design. Belt driven superchargers tend to cause that bearing issues when pullied down(16psi or greater?) to a point where they put a lot of strain on the crank. So Above 800whp is a crap shoot with LT4 before it's a case of rolling the dice. Some LT4's have been 1000whp and some have trashed the thrust bearing at 800whp. The LT1 seems to be a crap shoot above 700whp with the tight ring gaps even though some have made it 30k miles north of 800whp. I know still not 75k miles...junk. That being said would have more faith pushing a stock LT4 over a LT1 for sure...no disagreement there. Either way when you start making power nothing is guaranteed. Once you get 9's or quicker regardless of the platform parts break...aftermarket or stock. So really it's a moot point especially if you want to throw 75k mile longevity into the equation for either model because likely something will break on either car at that power level consistently hooking at the track for that kind of mileage. All that being said, the car mentioned in the OP is impressive none the less. 9's is moving pretty good regardless of the mods it took to get there.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 ZL1 Riverside Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,139
|
Thanks - yes 9s is always impressive
Do you follow this guy (18 min in)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 Coupe Join Date: May 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,869
|
What does it matter whether an SS or ZL1! A run in the 9 second range is impressive for a modded Camaro!
__________________
ZL1 Coupe, PDR, Exposed carbon fiber hood insert, My Link with Nav, M6 6 speed and Silver Ice Metallic. Mods done: ceramic window tint, GM Accessories Camaro floor mats and Roto-Fab CAI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 66 Chevelle SS Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,347
|
Quote:
I like the concept of what they are doing.
__________________
66 Chevelle SS 396
91 octane Driver n/a 6.44@105.78 1/8th mile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 66 Chevelle SS Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,347
|
Quote:
__________________
66 Chevelle SS 396
91 octane Driver n/a 6.44@105.78 1/8th mile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 66 Chevelle SS Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,347
|
Quote:
__________________
66 Chevelle SS 396
91 octane Driver n/a 6.44@105.78 1/8th mile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 66 Chevelle SS Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,347
|
Quote:
__________________
66 Chevelle SS 396
91 octane Driver n/a 6.44@105.78 1/8th mile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Account Suspended
|
Bro use the edit button. Don't quad post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,561
|
Yea I follow it. I can see his reasons for converting a LT over to port injection so they can control it with a Holley Terminator system. I agree with him the block and LT4 crank is stronger then LS, but I am sure he upgraded the OEM thrust bearing which is really the only issue with LT bottom ends in certain applications. Also if he went Turbos it might not be a issue at all even with the stock bearing. Killer build none the less.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: '21 Wild Cherry ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: WI
Posts: 2,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|