|
|
#15 |
![]() Drives: Turbo 6.2 Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 736
|
dads1le, thanks for the dyno and notes.
__________________
2016 Twin Turbo Camaro SS - 968hp/970tq 8.9@153
2018 LTZ Z71 Redline Silverado - 381hp/420tq 13.8@100 |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: 17 ss1le. Pray headcam e85 fbo msd Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 79
|
Choda. Welcome
. My tuner was baffled by the results of changing injectors with the significant added torque at lower rpm and nothing up top. We’re guessing it’s a difference in the way the injectors atomize the fuel. More like a sprinkler head than a garden hose. Both same volume but spread out differently
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
![]() Drives: 2018 Camaro ss Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: North Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
![]() Drives: 2018 Camaro ss Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: North Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
![]() Drives: 2018 Camaro ss Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: North Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Drives: 17 ss1le. Pray headcam e85 fbo msd Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 79
|
As far as I know all lt4 injectors are the same. I believe the spray pattern must be different from lt1 injectors to lt4 injectors. Both are being commanded the same air and fuel at lower rpm but lt4 injectors make more power. I do have pray performance stage 1 cam
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
I doubt you need any fuel upgrades with just a cam, your "lean" looking plugs are probably just from needing a better tune. I ran stock LT1 fuel system on my car using full E85 with a decent sized cam, headers, full exhaust, Rotofab and everything was fine. Car put down 492 rwhp on a stingy dyno and ran 11.2 in 2000 DA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() Drives: 2018 Camaro ss Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: North Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
Awesome! That's exactly what I'm running. Good to know. I was starting to worry that I might be hitting a limit with what I have and e85. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,661
|
NA heads/cam cars have been 600whp and ran 9's on stock fuel system with E85. There is no need for LT4 injectors on a mild setup.
I would take those graphs from IMC with a grain of salt. Justin can tune LS but I wasn't impressed with his tuning on Gen 5 stuff.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Drives: 2018 Camaro ss Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: North Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 147
|
All good to hear. I do plan on going forced induction eventually, but not for at least another year. So good to know ill be alright till then. Thanks for everyones input.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
![]() Drives: DZ Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Alaska
Posts: 612
|
IMO the bid difference between the LT1 and LT4 fuel system is the pressure. LT4 pump runs at 2900psi I think, LT1 stuff at 2100 (trying to work off memory).
I would deduct that the difference for the injectors as far as the fuel delivery goes is that they are optimized at the two different pressures. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
![]() Drives: 2018 Camaro ss Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: North Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 147
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
![]() Drives: DZ Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Alaska
Posts: 612
|
They are actually completely different castings - different port sizes & combustion chambers
However - in regards to the LT1 vs LT4 injectors themselves, the holes / patterns are "different" to get the correct atomization at the correct pressure. What does this mean? Yes, the LT4 injectors on paper "flow" more fuel, but it is because it has 38% more fuel pressure behind it on a stock LT4 vs a stock LT1. I think if you put a LT4 pump on LT1 injectors, they too would flow 38% more fuel, however you would have issues getting the fuel out of the injectors as the hole pattern / sizes on the LT1 injector were not optimized at 2900psi, they were optimized at 2100. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|