Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > I4 Turbo LTG Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-31-2018, 02:07 PM   #1
rayruner
 
Drives: 16 2.0 red
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: bloomsburg pa
Posts: 73
email from vt

Just received a email from vermont tuning about a tune, i was going to use a second computer, but brian mentioned his warranty guard, anyone know anything about that good or bad.
rayruner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2018, 04:02 PM   #2
cooper1965
Coopers Camaro
 
cooper1965's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 Flex Fuel LTG
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: St. Louis/Sullivan/Washington MO
Posts: 933
I talked about this subject a little bit a few topics down in my Vermont Tuning Review thread. It's kinda long though, so I will paste the only thing I'm going to say about that service here.



"I won't go into detail about the incremental PCM write count protection Vtuner offers, but after exchanging files with Brian for the last month, I have a good understanding of how he does it, and its quite genius. Im 100% confident following the instructions to restore the factory tune, it will be completely UN-detectable by any tool we use here at the dealership level. I do believe this service can only be achieved using EFI live."


Hope that helps!
__________________
Flex Fuel tuned by me using HPT-:-


---My Build Thread---
-----My IG PAGe-----
cooper1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2018, 04:56 PM   #3
rayruner
 
Drives: 16 2.0 red
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: bloomsburg pa
Posts: 73
tuning review

must have missed your tuning thread. thanks
rayruner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2018, 05:55 PM   #4
arpad_m


 
arpad_m's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 11,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooper1965 View Post
I won't go into detail about the incremental PCM write count protection Vtuner offers, but after exchanging files with Brian for the last month, I have a good understanding of how he does it, and its quite genius. Im 100% confident following the instructions to restore the factory tune, it will be completely UN-detectable by any tool we use here at the dealership level. I do believe this service can only be achieved using EFI live."
Out of curiosity, doesn't GM require dealers to send in the module(s) prior to approving any major warranty powertrain work to verify their factory status? Or perhaps there is an honor system in place, say, up to a certain number of automatically approved warranty cases per period?

(Not trying to suggest GM should do so, and of course I assume they have it locked down good enough to detect any changes, which might not be the case.)
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq

Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods
JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune

1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18
3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18
3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18
4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18
4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18
5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18
arpad_m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2018, 07:54 PM   #5
cooper1965
Coopers Camaro
 
cooper1965's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 Flex Fuel LTG
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: St. Louis/Sullivan/Washington MO
Posts: 933
Quote:
Originally Posted by arpad_m View Post
Out of curiosity, doesn't GM require dealers to send in the module(s) prior to approving any major warranty powertrain work to verify their factory status? Or perhaps there is an honor system in place, say, up to a certain number of automatically approved warranty cases per period?

(Not trying to suggest GM should do so, and of course I assume they have it locked down good enough to detect any changes, which might not be the case.)
Hey bro!!


"If" GM requests write counts, they only require an actual screen shot from within the software sent to them usually. In the last 20 years, I've only heard of modules being requested a small number of times. They were on suspect "high" end cars that are popular for alterations. ATS-V, ZR1, ZL1 ect.. Expensive to fix units with a questionable history or more. It costs GM a significant amount of money to go through the PCM's with their software, so its unlikely. BUT, If that happens, its game over. Ghosted OS's, re-flashes, swapped PCM's, piggy-backs, ect ect ....nothing is safe.
__________________
Flex Fuel tuned by me using HPT-:-


---My Build Thread---
-----My IG PAGe-----
cooper1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2018, 09:40 PM   #6
arpad_m


 
arpad_m's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 11,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooper1965 View Post
Hey bro!!


"If" GM requests write counts, they only require an actual screen shot from within the software sent to them usually. In the last 20 years, I've only heard of modules being requested a small number of times. They were on suspect "high" end cars that are popular for alterations. ATS-V, ZR1, ZL1 ect.. Expensive to fix units with a questionable history or more. It costs GM a significant amount of money to go through the PCM's with their software, so its unlikely. BUT, If that happens, its game over. Ghosted OS's, re-flashes, swapped PCM's, piggy-backs, ect ect ....nothing is safe.
Hey, wazzup Many thanks for the insider info, much appreciated. It's genuine professional curiousity, me being a software engineer and knowing how the automotive industry is usually behind the tip of the curve.

(Not that I'm about to go down the tuning route any time soon, but FI is definitely in the cards---once I learn to drive properly, up to my own expectations. You know, taking one step at a time, starting with the driver mod. Well, technically a CAI and a catch can were first, but real power adders will only come when I can handle them. But even then I'll simply man up, give up the warranty and not try to hide the tune.)
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq

Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods
JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune

1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18
3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18
3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18
4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18
4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18
5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18
arpad_m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2018, 08:06 AM   #7
cooper1965
Coopers Camaro
 
cooper1965's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 Flex Fuel LTG
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: St. Louis/Sullivan/Washington MO
Posts: 933
Quote:
Originally Posted by arpad_m View Post
Hey, wazzup Many thanks for the insider info, much appreciated. It's genuine professional curiousity, me being a software engineer and knowing how the automotive industry is usually behind the tip of the curve.

Boy you got that right. Its getting crazy, but more is coming.
(That's why I gotta keep you on my good side haha, we may need each others skill set in the future )


GM's phase-1 process, currently active on new duramax's, is already a multi-factor authentication and a 2048 bit key exchange using a hash digest unique for each VIN ECM and TCM. Writing any module requires a unique encrypted digital signature, virtually making it impossible to tune the way we used too, if at even at all. I can't confirm yet, but rumor has is this type of security will become standard across the board with GM starting in 2019-2020.
__________________
Flex Fuel tuned by me using HPT-:-


---My Build Thread---
-----My IG PAGe-----
cooper1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2018, 03:40 PM   #8
Kevin_S17
 
Kevin_S17's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 2SS M6 Vert Summit White
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 113
VT Tuning warranty guard totally worth it

Quote:
Originally Posted by rayruner View Post
Just received a email from vermont tuning about a tune, i was going to use a second computer, but brian mentioned his warranty guard, anyone know anything about that good or bad.
Speaking from personal experience. I had a tune from VT Tuning on my 2017 2.0T. I got the warranty guard as my car had approx. 3k miles on it. Engine took a dump at approx. 3800 miles. I re-flashed the stock tune that Brian at VT Tuning sent me. Took the car to the dealer. The dealer checked out the car - end result engine replaced under warranty.

Totally worth it. Had I used anyone else as a tuner, I'm pretty sure I would have been screwed.
Kevin_S17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2018, 09:47 AM   #9
dekes1
 
Drives: Camaro like
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_S17 View Post
Speaking from personal experience. I had a tune from VT Tuning on my 2017 2.0T. I got the warranty guard as my car had approx. 3k miles on it. Engine took a dump at approx. 3800 miles. I re-flashed the stock tune that Brian at VT Tuning sent me. Took the car to the dealer. The dealer checked out the car - end result engine replaced under warranty.

Totally worth it. Had I used anyone else as a tuner, I'm pretty sure I would have been screwed.
Wait, you got a VT tune and 800 miles later your engine blew up? Did that in itself not raise huge red flags? Warranty guard sounds great, but is it only needed because the tune was risky and poorly tested to begin with?

One could argue that your final statement is the exact opposite: if you had used anyone else as a tuner, you wouldn't have been screwed by a blown engine
dekes1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2018, 10:03 AM   #10
cooper1965
Coopers Camaro
 
cooper1965's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 Flex Fuel LTG
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: St. Louis/Sullivan/Washington MO
Posts: 933
Quote:
Originally Posted by dekes1 View Post
Wait, you got a VT tune and 800 miles later your engine blew up? Did that in itself not raise huge red flags? Warranty guard sounds great, but is it only needed because the tune was risky and poorly tested to begin with?

One could argue that your final statement is the exact opposite: if you had used anyone else as a tuner, you wouldn't have been screwed by a blown engine

He had a previous engine issue there bud. Lets not go jump to absurd assumptions here lol.
__________________
Flex Fuel tuned by me using HPT-:-


---My Build Thread---
-----My IG PAGe-----
cooper1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2018, 11:18 AM   #11
Kevin_S17
 
Kevin_S17's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 2SS M6 Vert Summit White
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by dekes1 View Post
Wait, you got a VT tune and 800 miles later your engine blew up? Did that in itself not raise huge red flags? Warranty guard sounds great, but is it only needed because the tune was risky and poorly tested to begin with?

One could argue that your final statement is the exact opposite: if you had used anyone else as a tuner, you wouldn't have been screwed by a blown engine
As Cooper1965 mentioned - long story short but I heard what I thought was spark knock at high rpms above 5000 rpm. I was thinking "no way my new engine has spark knock". I "thought" it was the Injen CAI I had installed and was making noise knocking against the inner fender. So I continued driving it while trying to keep the CAI in place. To make matters more interesting, the CAI was defective. The air filter kept coming loose from the housing. So I kept struggling with the CAI all the time thinking the knocking noise was originating from it.

I'm actually really glad I installed the tune when I did (it was on the car for a grand total of 10 hrs). I had a log of the engine running on the stock tune. I had a log running right before the engine crapped out. It showed all engine parameters in normal range. Engine failure is definitely a material issue as the engine was doomed from the start.
Kevin_S17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2018, 12:08 PM   #12
dekes1
 
Drives: Camaro like
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Ohio
Posts: 96
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooper1965 View Post
He had a previous engine issue there bud. Lets not go jump to absurd assumptions here lol.
Let's not call the addition of a tune and a short term later engine failure as absurd. It's a fair, and required challenge, when evaluating Tuner's competency.
I see more and more blown engines on these forums and can't help but question the origination.

And no offense intended to Kevin_S17, but "my engine sounds like it's knocking and I can't find the cause, but I'm still going to proceed with an aftermarket tune" is an interesting thought process.
dekes1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2018, 02:02 PM   #13
cooper1965
Coopers Camaro
 
cooper1965's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 Flex Fuel LTG
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: St. Louis/Sullivan/Washington MO
Posts: 933
Quote:
Originally Posted by dekes1 View Post
Let's not call the addition of a tune and a short term later engine failure as absurd. It's a fair, and required challenge, when evaluating Tuner's competency.
I see more and more blown engines on these forums and can't help but question the origination.

And no offense intended to Kevin_S17, but "my engine sounds like it's knocking and I can't find the cause, but I'm still going to proceed with an aftermarket tune" is an interesting thought process.

Yeah, I hear ya on that man. My "absurd" comment was more directed at your two statements here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dekes1 View Post
"the tune was risky and poorly tested to begin with"
"if you had used anyone else as a tuner, you wouldn't have been screwed by a blown engine"

That is just simply not the case. In fact, Kevin here, is the first example I've seen of a blown engine with a Vtune(If you want to call 10 hours having a tune). The other blown engine examples ranged the board from all the major players, too a few not so major players.



Truth is, none of them may even be related to the "tune" per say. These engines have a history, and they are not much different today then they were yesterday. We are still replacing LTG's under warranty on cars that are obviously UN-modified. Usually with extremely low mileage. Symptom's are always the same, damage follows suit. Piston, ring land ect.. Im with you on questioning the origins though. I've often wondered if the root issue isn't a detonation problem. Its one of the main reasons I use the fuel I do.
__________________
Flex Fuel tuned by me using HPT-:-


---My Build Thread---
-----My IG PAGe-----
cooper1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2018, 11:26 PM   #14
Kevin_S17
 
Kevin_S17's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 2SS M6 Vert Summit White
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by dekes1 View Post
And no offense intended to Kevin_S17, but "my engine sounds like it's knocking and I can't find the cause, but I'm still going to proceed with an aftermarket tune" is an interesting thought process.
Agreed, doesn’t look like a great decision in hindsight. Probably a little bit of ignorance on my part and listening to too many people in this forum. Particularly the part where I was told that if you get knock after installing a CAI you should get it “tuned out”. Should have just removed the CAI. Lesson learned.
Kevin_S17 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.