|
|
#29 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 18 ZL1 nightfall grey A10 Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: RGV Texas
Posts: 1,527
|
I don’t give much thought or comparison to the hellcat/demon. Sure they’re fast but I can go even faster with a Fox body mustang and about 30k in mods but why do I wanna just go straight and no look awesome. The zl1 is the total package. Looks, power, handling, and comfort. It’s a great balance with room to grow and make it you own. The challenger chargers have had the same look forever. They need to move on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
![]() Drives: Zl1 Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Washington
Posts: 195
|
I spent 2500 on my zl1 and ran 10.88 @ 133.89. Screw that chrysler p.o.s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,990
|
No, GM won’t respond.
GM builds something, then moves on. They don’t care what the competition does.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2023 Black ZL1 Auto Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: FEMA Region 4
Posts: 2,936
|
Just read on Hellcat.org that Dodge is forcing you to load them up with a sunroof and other options. A widebody ranges up to $98k
fully loaded and you won't see many for less than $87k. Dodge has more packages than Santa. They appear to be coming in a bit higher at minimum than the Demon was. $25k more than a ZL1 that I priced out is probably a deal breaker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 66 Chevelle SS Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,347
|
Quote:
Chevrolet is "assuming" everyone likes going in circles. I'm assuming they don't want to pay for a warranty repair on a car that actually accelerates from a dead stop with sticky tires on it. When you want to run with the big dogs you just have learn to lift your leg a little higher.
__________________
66 Chevelle SS 396
91 octane Driver n/a 6.44@105.78 1/8th mile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,052
|
Quote:
Though I've owned nothing but Chevys, I wouldn't consider myself brand loyal. I loved mustangs back in the fox body days, and I wouldn't rule out owning a hellcat or mustang now. If you can get a mid 10 second car off the showroom floor for an affordable price, how can you go wrong with that? I love the fact that Dodge has the balls to build cars like these, forcing others to either take a back seat, or try to come up with something better.
__________________
'17 ZL1 10.99@129 stock. 4225# raceweight. Best 60'- 1.66 on factory tires. 10.48@132 E50, intake and tune. 4270 lbs
https://youtu.be/EyHtdH9XOkY https://youtu.be/Lcu41obbTf8 '13 ZL1 BRM A6. 11.591 @ 119.2 factory stock with a 1.68 60'! Best stock mph 121.8. 11.29 @ 123 RotoFab, drag radials and skinnies. 4360# raceweight. http://youtu.be/yggIA3C_kkA 2014... back to stock http://youtu.be/spQLaTWbThs 2013... stock & RotoFab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() Drives: 1LT RS 2.0T 8A HD Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: McHenry, IL
Posts: 239
|
Nobody really gives a damn about the track performance other than crazies like us.
GM needs to grab a headline or two, and maybe give stuff real names. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Drives: Fast Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,696
|
I know we Chevy/ZL1 guys like to pound the "But track times!" drum a lot. And I'm all in to do that. But face facts, on the road, the HP of the Hellcat and especially new Red Eye is hard to compete with. The ZL1 is a great package. But it sure could use a HP bump. And step one is getting rid of this STUPID 1.7L supercharger that was the biggest mistake GM Performance has made in decades.
The biggest problem with the Dodges is obviously they're literally 20 years old now...Like who cars about a hood change and a set of Bushwhacker fender flares? The chassis they're built on is a 20+ year old discarded Mercedes SUV/Sedan chassis. The body design has been around forever now. And everything on the car is old fashion with a slightly modern touch. They're big, plush, and brutally fast in a straight-line and that's about it. They do not look good. They're not aerodynamic. The list goes on. Bottom line, the ZL1 will remain king over Dodge's catalogue of cars in every comparison except drag strip runs. However, it is getting pretty hard to keep your head up in HP discussions as a LT4 guy. Short of a blower swap or spray, we have a max of 750 RWHP car. The OLD hellcat made 800+ RWHP on bolt ons and went 9s. Who knows what the new one will do. Time to drop an LT5 in the ZL1 (Of course GM won't, as said by a previous poster, GM builds a car and moves on). |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT, Shelby GT500 Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,376
|
Quote:
I don't hate the chassis in the Dodges. They're huge and heavy, but work for what they're trying to do. Big, comfy, plush cars with absurd power. I was showing my co-workers the "Redeye" this morning and was telling them it's basically an 800 horsepower couch. Which I think is cool, but it all depends on what you want. The ZL1 is a fighter jet and the Challenger/Chargers are lazy boy recliners with wheels and a massive engine. And yes, the LT5 would perfect the ZL1. It solves the 2 things I hate about the LT4 (pathetic supercharger and direct injection only). Last edited by Blackdevil77; 06-29-2018 at 11:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,634
|
GM builds a car and moves on to the next one.. The next V, ZL1, 1LE, SS... are already in the works. Exciting to think what the CT5, C8 and gen7 will bring.
Chevy’s objective couldn’t be more clear. Performace for the American market that embarrasses the German’s at a fraction of the price. Not an 800 HP Lazyboy
__________________
"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.” Ronald Reagan - |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 66 Chevelle SS Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,347
|
Quote:
__________________
66 Chevelle SS 396
91 octane Driver n/a 6.44@105.78 1/8th mile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 66 Chevelle SS Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,347
|
Quote:
The Dodge has adequate practicality to it. It's fairly nice on the inside as well.
__________________
66 Chevelle SS 396
91 octane Driver n/a 6.44@105.78 1/8th mile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
![]() Drives: Really Fast Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: In The Woods
Posts: 238
|
Maybe someone can explain to me why there are complaints that Chevy doesn’t have something to compete with the Hellcat in a straight line. Dodge wants to be the master of that realm. You bought the wrong car. Enjoy the Camaro for what it is. If you don’t like losing a drag race then make the trade to a Hellcat. Chevy has COPO because the track is where 800hp cars belong.
__________________
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |||
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,692
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
no option 550 HP. Ford then had to do a whole bunch of stuff to surpass the ZL1 and only in HP for the next year. And Dodge needed 3 years to bring out the HC which in 2015 was the final year of the 5th Gen anyway. This time around it is taking Ford all this time to challenge the ZL1. The GT500 might not even arrive until 2020 which will be 3 MYs later. The HC is stepping their game up but 2019 is 2 MYs after the 17 ZL1. And it is safe to say that neither will take the ZL1 1LE around a track. And GM isn't even thinking about upping the ZL1 or ZL1 1LE, lol!! By the time these guys step up to the plate GM will have a killer 7th Gen ready to slap the shit out of them all over again. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|