Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


Griffin Motorsports


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-21-2018, 06:03 PM   #211
Snowblind

 
Snowblind's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 2SS / '05 SRT10 Ram / '65 bu
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philthy
Posts: 978
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1295/SS View Post
Have you ever run your Boss at the track? I have seen several and none have come close to the times you're quoting from mags.
That's a question that has went unanswered.

It is easy to cherry pick numbers that fit your particular argument. A quick Google search pulls up MotorTrend as the top hit, but if you dig some more you will find that AutoRivals ran a 12.7 back in the day and Hennessey tested a Boss 302 also, 12.7@112.9 before modding it.

A gutted Boss running 1/4 times below.
https://youtu.be/uIYvF89P4Kk
__________________
H/C SBE 9.80@140 powered by Texas Speed
Snowblind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2018, 08:23 PM   #212
1295/SS
 
1295/SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 87 GNX 87 Turbo T '13 CTS-V
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by newmoon View Post
I owned a 2012 GT and the Boss is much faster. Most reviews have the Boss 3-5 tenths quicker and 3-4 mph faster in the 1/4. I have driven a new 1LE and I would say the race would be neck and neck likely coming down to who is the better driver, unlike the automatics it is going to take the driver skills to launch the car.

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/ford/...boss-302-test/

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/ford/...-premium-test/
Keep telling yourself that.
__________________
1987 Buick GNX
1987 Buick Turbo T
2013 CTS-V Coupe
1295/SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2018, 08:26 PM   #213
hotlap


 
hotlap's Avatar
 
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastCarFanBoy View Post
relax, the point of bringing up the Boss was to show that 2 cars of equal weight one being a torque monster with a HP advantage and the other being a 5yo gutless turd with a feminine powerband and down on peak power can produce the same 1/4 mile times/speeds.

at least thats what i got out of it.
If Ford had it all figured out in the Boss 5 years ago, what happened that the coyote shit the bed so badly in the S550? Them’s GT350 Voodoo ETs. Pretty cool that the $37,995 base SS is right there with them.

https://www.caranddriver.com/compari...e-specs-page-4

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/ford/...gt350r-review/
__________________

"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.”
Ronald Reagan -
hotlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 01:24 AM   #214
LS6-M22
Rockcrusher
 
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Spring Hill FL
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1295/SS View Post
Keep telling yourself that.
Yeah I found that funny myself
LS6-M22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 09:31 AM   #215
shaffe


 
Drives: 21 Bronco
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Carol Stream
Posts: 6,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotlap View Post
If Ford had it all figured out in the Boss 5 years ago, what happened that the coyote shit the bed so badly in the S550? Them’s GT350 Voodoo ETs. Pretty cool that the $37,995 base SS is right there with them.

https://www.caranddriver.com/compari...e-specs-page-4

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/ford/...gt350r-review/
I don't think it's the engines. Despite the solid axle being ancient Ford had it dialed in and it put the power down. Also the S197 cars were lighter. So I would say its the weight gain and the IRS not putting power down as efficiently/effectively
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT View Post
Lets keep it simple. ..
it has more power...its available power is like a set kof double Ds (no matter where your face is... theyre everywhere) it has the suspension to mame it matter...(
shaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 10:48 AM   #216
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaffe View Post
I don't think it's the engines. Despite the solid axle being ancient Ford had it dialed in and it put the power down. Also the S197 cars were lighter. So I would say its the weight gain and the IRS not putting power down as efficiently/effectively
The thing is..the SRA is generally better for track performance (both drag and open course). A SRA with a properly set up 4 link, watts link and torque arm is a much more planted and generally stable car than a IRS car of similar spec.

Where the SRA loses out is on the streets in terms of comfort and with less skilled drivers who don't know how to handle the loss of stability when a road hazard appears (IE a pothole, sudden dip in the road, etc).
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 01:24 PM   #217
DevilsReject97
Nightmare
 
DevilsReject97's Avatar
 
Drives: Your mom crazy in bed
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Naptown
Posts: 2,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
The thing is..the SRA is generally better for track performance (both drag and open course). A SRA with a properly set up 4 link, watts link and torque arm is a much more planted and generally stable car than a IRS car of similar spec.

Where the SRA loses out is on the streets in terms of comfort and with less skilled drivers who don't know how to handle the loss of stability when a road hazard appears (IE a pothole, sudden dip in the road, etc).
VIR lap times:

2012 Boss Mustang GT - 3:02 SRA
2016 1LE V6 Camaro - 3:04 IRS

And the V6 Camaro actually beat the 2016 GT too around the track as well...

SRA is great for drag racing...but on a road course....IRS will out perform SRA's every time...can you make an SRA perform as good? You can get it in the ballpark, but not as good imho...
__________________
DevilsReject97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 01:59 PM   #218
GuywithL86
 
Drives: Black
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Nj
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsReject97 View Post
VIR lap times:

2012 Boss Mustang GT - 3:02 SRA
2016 1LE V6 Camaro - 3:04 IRS
Lol
GuywithL86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 02:20 PM   #219
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsReject97 View Post
VIR lap times:

2012 Boss Mustang GT - 3:02 SRA
2016 1LE V6 Camaro - 3:04 IRS

And the V6 Camaro actually beat the 2016 GT too around the track as well...

SRA is great for drag racing...but on a road course....IRS will out perform SRA's every time...can you make an SRA perform as good? You can get it in the ballpark, but not as good imho...
Apparently I wasn't making myself clear.

The Boss Mustang was set up well for a stock factory car. I was mentioning things that were not included in the factory Boss (4 link, watts link, torque arm, etc)

As I said, the notion of an IRS being inherently superior is rubbish.

Put a Boss 302 with a tuned 4 link, watts link and torque arm on a track, on the same day and same driver, with a 2013 1LE (or a 2016 SS) and it can easily take the win because an IRS is not necessarily a shoe in for victory.
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 03:04 PM   #220
DevilsReject97
Nightmare
 
DevilsReject97's Avatar
 
Drives: Your mom crazy in bed
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Naptown
Posts: 2,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
Apparently I wasn't making myself clear.

The Boss Mustang was set up well for a stock factory car. I was mentioning things that were not included in the factory Boss (4 link, watts link, torque arm, etc)

As I said, the notion of an IRS being inherently superior is rubbish.

Put a Boss 302 with a tuned 4 link, watts link and torque arm on a track, on the same day and same driver, with a 2013 1LE (or a 2016 SS) and it can easily take the win because an IRS is not necessarily a shoe in for victory.
Awwwwww dude....don't get mad...

Point is, you take a well setup IRS suspension and match it against a well setup SRA suspension, same day same driver, and I'll watch the IRS win....

That's not to say the SRA will be junk or anything...but just stop with this oh it will be magical thought process..
__________________
DevilsReject97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 03:18 PM   #221
whiteboyblues2001

 
whiteboyblues2001's Avatar
 
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
Apparently I wasn't making myself clear.

The Boss Mustang was set up well for a stock factory car. I was mentioning things that were not included in the factory Boss (4 link, watts link, torque arm, etc)

As I said, the notion of an IRS being inherently superior is rubbish.

Put a Boss 302 with a tuned 4 link, watts link and torque arm on a track, on the same day and same driver, with a 2013 1LE (or a 2016 SS) and it can easily take the win because an IRS is not necessarily a shoe in for victory.
The Boss 302 Laguna Seca version ran three seconds slower than the non-1LE Camaro at Streets of Willow. The mods you mentioned will help, but they won't make up for a three second differential. The SS 1LE is 2 1/2 seconds faster then the standard SS at Streets. That makes it almost six seconds faster in one lap.
whiteboyblues2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 03:24 PM   #222
newmoon


 
newmoon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 GT350
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevilsReject97 View Post
Awwwwww dude....don't get mad...

Point is, you take a well setup IRS suspension and match it against a well setup SRA suspension, same day same driver, and I'll watch the IRS win....

That's not to say the SRA will be junk or anything...but just stop with this oh it will be magical thought process..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To argue about a venue that the overall vast majority of these cars will never enter is kind of ridiculous. Even if they were to enter the venue would the driver even have the ability to extract the true limits of the car? Would the owner/driver spend the high dollar cost of track racing (track fees, club memberships, tires, brakes), and ignore fear of accident, or drivetrain damage, to push their car to the absolute limits.

Wouldn't the conversation be better served talking about the venues that the car will be used in? Focus on the 99% instead of the 1%.
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang
2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock
2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s
2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s
2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned
1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot
newmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 03:40 PM   #223
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,418
IRS has an even bigger advantage on regular less than perfect road conditions. Real world. One tire gets unsettled over a bump instead of both
ULTRAZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2018, 03:46 PM   #224
FastCarFanBoy
Banned
 
Drives: 2013 GB GT
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 954
There is validity in the track times as I’m sure the 1LE is undoubtedly easier to drive near the limit and therefore will make inexperienced drivers feel more confident. Once you start getting into the <2 second delta range it probably means little on the street.
FastCarFanBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.