Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-26-2017, 03:35 PM   #925
jmackisback
 
jmackisback's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 154
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...al-test-review

l o l

"In testing, our six-speed manual (a 10-speed automatic is optional) matched the zero-to-60 time of the outgoing car at 4.3 seconds but opened 0.3-second and 3-mph gaps through the quarter-mile with a 12.6-second run at 115 mph. By 150 mph, the new GT was 2.4 seconds quicker. The extra power isn’t glaringly obvious, but it gives the GT barstool bragging rights over the 455-hp Camaro SS. Just know that if the argument spills into the streets, the Chevy is still quicker."
__________________

1987 Camaro V6
1988 Camaro IROC Z
1993 Camaro Z28
1999 Camaro SS
2017 Camaro SS
jmackisback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:35 PM   #926
Spartan268
 
Spartan268's Avatar
 
Drives: HB 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldman View Post
I've seen so little actually working and drivable twin turbo anything in my life, and even less at the tracks or autoX. So the word "easy" probably should not come in the same sentence as twin turbo. The reality is greater than the friction. Sure I love turbo, love twin turbo even more. I'm just pointing out that for DD crowded it is more myth than reality. Sure I expect you and others to post about how turn key 100% reliable etc a TT setup is. Not in my experience or world, glad it maybe in yours. Point being as soon as you bring up TT in a STOCK NA debate.... your cause is lost.
So true. Almost every car I know of around this area with twins (That was originally N/A) always end with the same something got blown story. Supercharger as well but to a lesser extent since everyone seems to ignore it. We'll see how my friends whipple build take him down the road on his 16' GT. It'll be interesting considering he beats his car during hooligan stuff.
Spartan268 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:37 PM   #927
kttxz06

 
kttxz06's Avatar
 
Drives: '18 Zl1. '18 GT350.
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Katy
Posts: 2,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunmetalmissle View Post
The Car and driver instrumented test numbers are up for the 18 GT. 12.6 @115. The comparo must be coming soon.

“The extra power isn’t glaringly obvious, but it gives the GT barstool bragging rights over the 455-hp Camaro SS. Just know that if the argument spills into the streets, the Chevy is still quicker.”
^ Just as we all predicted. 12.6 will be your above avg run with MOST runs still being in the high 12's, low 13's. Only hero runs will hit low 12's.

And that is what Ford fanboys all across the universe were claiming would slay the Camaro. Well, looks like it's on par................at best with the Camaro. So, Ford...............failed bigly on this one. There's always the next GT. Maybe they'll get it right one of these days.
__________________
There's only 2 people I trust. 1 of them is me, the other's not you. 2018 Zl1. 1199 RWHP/931 TQ.
kttxz06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:39 PM   #928
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmackisback View Post
Actually that seems to be a really glowing review, and if you compare it with the oft-quoted performance times of 13.0/113MPH that people throw around here..that's a pretty considerable improvement.
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:40 PM   #929
kttxz06

 
kttxz06's Avatar
 
Drives: '18 Zl1. '18 GT350.
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Katy
Posts: 2,104
In testing, our six-speed manual (a 10-speed automatic is optional) matched the zero-to-60 time of the outgoing car at 4.3 seconds but opened 0.3-second and 3-mph gaps through the quarter-mile with a 12.6-second run at 115 mph. By 150 mph, the new GT was 2.4 seconds quicker. The extra power isn’t glaringly obvious, but it gives the GT barstool bragging rights over the 455-hp Camaro SS. Just know that if the argument spills into the streets, the Chevy is still quicker.

Fall...............on..................your....... .......face. Splat. Bravo Ford. Bravo. Up against a 3 yr old Maro too. Wait till the refresh comes out and the Maro gets a 15-20 hp bump. It's really gonna squash it.
__________________
There's only 2 people I trust. 1 of them is me, the other's not you. 2018 Zl1. 1199 RWHP/931 TQ.
kttxz06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:44 PM   #930
kttxz06

 
kttxz06's Avatar
 
Drives: '18 Zl1. '18 GT350.
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Katy
Posts: 2,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
Actually that seems to be a really glowing review, and if you compare it with the oft-quoted performance times of 13.0/113MPH that people throw around here..that's a pretty considerable improvement.
True. Point well taken. The problem is this.................for the past 6 months. Ford fanboys have been waiting. Holding their breathe. Hoping. Just praying. More hoping. More praying. And in the back of their heads, they told themselves..........THIS Mustang GT would change the game. It would slay Camaro's and bring justice back to the world. When, in all reality, it's just a fkn Camaro SS. haha. They did nothing.........well, very little, to bring the Mustang GT to the forefront. They failed. Is it better than the last GT? Oh, hell yea. But, is it what everyone else was expecting? Nope. Not by a long shot. So, they win the argument that it's better than the last GT, but it's on par.................at best with the Camaro SS which is now 3 yrs old. So, a big step back and FAIL is written all over it. Just saying.

Now, we have to deal with the............well, a tune and tire and you Zl1 owners better watch out. It's gotten borderline fkn comical from the Ford camp. And why? Because one hero did a hero run on a prepped track in ideal air. Now, that riled the Mustang crowd up thinking the GT was out the box a 12.2 car. So, they took that 12.2. Figured, hey, if we e85/tuned/tired, we'd smash Zl1's. Well, sorry. That hasn't happened. Now, we are reading that............if you e85/tune/exhaust/tire, and start taking seats out, it's a 10 second car. THIS IS WHY................Mustang owners for the most part deserve the crack back from the Maro camp. It's funny to watch them all run and hide now.
__________________
There's only 2 people I trust. 1 of them is me, the other's not you. 2018 Zl1. 1199 RWHP/931 TQ.
kttxz06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:44 PM   #931
hotlap


 
hotlap's Avatar
 
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunmetalmissle View Post
The Car and driver instrumented test numbers are up for the 18 GT. 12.6 @115. The comparo must be coming soon.

“The extra power isn’t glaringly obvious, but it gives the GT barstool bragging rights over the 455-hp Camaro SS. Just know that if the argument spills into the streets, the Chevy is still quicker.”
Manual transmission but still a big ouch for the Mustang fans in the last sentence of that quote

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...al-test-review
__________________

"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.”
Ronald Reagan -
hotlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:46 PM   #932
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by kttxz06 View Post
In testing, our six-speed manual (a 10-speed automatic is optional) matched the zero-to-60 time of the outgoing car at 4.3 seconds but opened 0.3-second and 3-mph gaps through the quarter-mile with a 12.6-second run at 115 mph. By 150 mph, the new GT was 2.4 seconds quicker. The extra power isn’t glaringly obvious, but it gives the GT barstool bragging rights over the 455-hp Camaro SS. Just know that if the argument spills into the streets, the Chevy is still quicker.

Fall...............on..................your....... .......face. Splat. Bravo Ford. Bravo. Up against a 3 yr old Maro too. Wait till the refresh comes out and the Maro gets a 15-20 hp bump. It's really gonna squash it.
Why would the Camaro get bump now when the Corvette never has, even in the GrandSport. It's more likely to maintain it's stock power levels through the end of this generation.
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:48 PM   #933
jmackisback
 
jmackisback's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 Camaro ZL1
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 154
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
Actually that seems to be a really glowing review, and if you compare it with the oft-quoted performance times of 13.0/113MPH that people throw around here..that's a pretty considerable improvement.

I lol'd because of the hype the Ford fan boys have been creating the past couple of months. Better than the previous years? For sure. Great? Not really.
__________________

1987 Camaro V6
1988 Camaro IROC Z
1993 Camaro Z28
1999 Camaro SS
2017 Camaro SS
jmackisback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:52 PM   #934
kttxz06

 
kttxz06's Avatar
 
Drives: '18 Zl1. '18 GT350.
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Katy
Posts: 2,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
Why would the Camaro get bump now when the Corvette never has, even in the GrandSport. It's more likely to maintain it's stock power levels through the end of this generation.
Even so, that makes it look even worse for the Ford Mustang crowd. The refresh will have some kind of hp bump. Don't care about what the Vette camp is doing right now.

I'm still waiting on a '18 GT to come slay my Zl1. I have a feeling I'll be waiting a long long long time.
__________________
There's only 2 people I trust. 1 of them is me, the other's not you. 2018 Zl1. 1199 RWHP/931 TQ.
kttxz06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:53 PM   #935
kttxz06

 
kttxz06's Avatar
 
Drives: '18 Zl1. '18 GT350.
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Katy
Posts: 2,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmackisback View Post
I lol'd because of the hype the Ford fan boys have been creating the past couple of months. Better than the previous years? For sure. Great? Not really.

__________________
There's only 2 people I trust. 1 of them is me, the other's not you. 2018 Zl1. 1199 RWHP/931 TQ.
kttxz06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:54 PM   #936
hotlap


 
hotlap's Avatar
 
Drives: 20 1LE 2SS M6 Rally Green
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Franklin WI
Posts: 6,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife View Post
Actually that seems to be a really glowing review, and if you compare it with the oft-quoted performance times of 13.0/113MPH that people throw around here..that's a pretty considerable improvement.
Isn't the new GT suppose to be a Corvette Stingray killer? High 11s all day long?
__________________

"the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.”
Ronald Reagan -
hotlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 03:55 PM   #937
kttxz06

 
kttxz06's Avatar
 
Drives: '18 Zl1. '18 GT350.
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Katy
Posts: 2,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotlap View Post
Isn't the new GT suppose to be a Corvette Stingray killer? High 11s all day long?
Well, now, it's supposed to be a 10 second car. You just need e85/tune/tires/exhaust/intake/ and take the seats out. The Mustang crowd is comedy central at best.

That's like me taking my Zl1. Throwing $10k in it and ripping all the fkn interior out going over to the McLaren forums and calling out all the 720's. Telling them I'm gonna slay the 720 s. Imagine their response.
__________________
There's only 2 people I trust. 1 of them is me, the other's not you. 2018 Zl1. 1199 RWHP/931 TQ.
kttxz06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2017, 04:30 PM   #938
Spartan268
 
Spartan268's Avatar
 
Drives: HB 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 518
One thing I do want to point out. Were they testing with they yellow stang? Cause it has the Michelin PS4S.. I remember a lot of people were saying the Edmunds test was hampered by bad driver and tires. Here it looks like tires has been solved but it still got the same sprint of 12.6 seconds..

13vertss/r's clarified edmunds was auto. Got it confused

Last edited by Spartan268; 12-26-2017 at 04:47 PM.
Spartan268 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.