Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction Discussions


KPM Fuel Systems


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-26-2017, 01:23 PM   #15
aka Reckless
 
aka Reckless's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShizzySupra View Post
Hot damn man. Can't wait to see what it does with more octane/ethanol and more boost. I have been hoping to see what someone can do with one of the "smaller" head units on an maxed out A8 and you have the drop in pistons I was going to use as well.
We will be trying different things. I want to keep this as a street car, and don't really want to rely on Alky Injection. So I want to find the maximum, safe limit without alky. Would love to be able to run E85 all the time too. It seems there will be trade offs in the short term.
aka Reckless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2017, 01:27 PM   #16
PRAY


 
PRAY's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by aka Reckless View Post
I clarified with Mike. The NA numbers were in 6th gear (I did those pulls), but he said he pulled in 5th under boost. He lifted early because the car needs a breather added. Crankcase pressure is pushing oil out the rear seal. He didn't want to go any further.
That makes way more sense. I lose 20/30rw by pulling my car in 5th vs. 6th.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
PRAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2017, 02:01 PM   #17
DenverTaco07


 
DenverTaco07's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 SS 1LE, 2017 Volt, 2013 Pilot
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by aka Reckless View Post
This
Oh, ok, your post made it seem like this device was supposed to make it quieter...
__________________
2017 SS 1LE | HBM | Vortech V3-Si supercharger (620RWHP and 575ft lbs) | PDR | Black Bowties | Illuminated Front Black Bowtie | Illuminated Door Sills | Smoked Tails | vented seats mod
DenverTaco07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2017, 11:49 PM   #18
gippy87
 
Drives: 2016 2ss
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: RI
Posts: 179
These numbers are so much higher than mine and the only difference is the fuel and cam. I wasn't able to max out my fuel with the stock lt1 setup because i wasnt moving enough air to need any more. i peaked at 540wheel. Why do you think yours is making so much more? is the cam really worth another 100 wheel?? Also i dont think i was able to hit 8 psi with how free flowing the catless headers are id probably need to drop the pulley size.
gippy87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2017, 03:04 PM   #19
aka Reckless
 
aka Reckless's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 541
Well I have a cam and headers, so both of those help move the air through more efficiently. I also have a custom tune. Are you using a "canned" tune?
aka Reckless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2017, 01:07 AM   #20
gippy87
 
Drives: 2016 2ss
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: RI
Posts: 179
I also have headers and a custom tune. no cam
gippy87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2017, 12:55 PM   #21
aka Reckless
 
aka Reckless's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS Camaro
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 541
I guess the cam is about the only diff then, unless it's your exhaust? Could be the dyno too. Kind of apples and oranges comparing two different dynos.
aka Reckless is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.