|
|
#71 |
![]() Drives: Challenger&Camaro Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 18
|
The thing I like is there are at least 10 Camaros and Mustangs for every Challenger in my town. You just don't see as many Challengers for what ever the reason and that's fine by me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
|
A premium GT starts at $32,845, 2SS at $34,295, GT500 at $48,645, SRT8 at $42K+. 7K+ is more of a price difference than the 6k between the GT500 and SRT8. By your logic of the car doesnt cost much more than what Ford or Chevy are asking purely proves my point that the GT500 is the better value becuase Ford is asking even less of a price difference between the GT500 and SRT8 vs the difference between SRT8 and GT/SS. For 7K+ I would surely hope it offers more of a performance advantage over the GT/SS and while it might offer a little it wont be nearly as big of a gap that the GT500 offers over the SRT8.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
|
In price comparisons you need to remember the automatic is standard in the Challenger, where it is not in the others. Therefore, you need to put an auto on the other two, which raises the prices of both by over $1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
|
The auto is a standard option really? Thats pretty cool actually. Ok they are all 6K apart.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
Don't forget you also need to add $1,200 for HID lighting on top of the $1,185 for auto tranny. Don't forget $470 for stripes that are standard on challenger. That right there brings the total to $37,280 and I'm sure I'm forgetting other stuff the challenger has to offer. Did I mention that it has a larger more powerful engine and seats 5 people whereas the camaro seats only 4??? After it's all said and done, it is a bit more expensive but sometimes you gotta pay more to drive something different than everybody else I guess..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
The Road's A Bad Joke...
Drives: '12 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 567
|
I agree with that 100%
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
![]() Drives: 69,10 camaro 71 chevelle Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Shelbyville, IL
Posts: 722
|
Is it just me or does this track look like its falling off of a cliff running down hill?
__________________
2010 Camaro SS RS M6 Bone stock 12.58 at 110mph http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=263
1971 Chevelle SS 454 365hp NHRA C/SA 10.73 at 122 1969 Camaro (427 ZL-1 clone) M-22 being built 1982 Siverado 4x4 454 Mud truck stock class 3.66 sec in 150' of mud |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
![]() Drives: 2009 Cobalt SS/TC Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 368
|
Uphill shutdown.
__________________
2009 Cobalt SS/TC: 10.89 at 133mph
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm wondering how responsive it will be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Casual Camaro Owner
Drives: 2010 Black LS V6 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Jacksonville Fl
Posts: 1,090
|
but to be fare the challenger is the bigger car so maybe thats where the price comes from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mission, BC
Posts: 862
|
Why would anyone consider it a plus to pay more for a manual transmission?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 IBM 1SS (Former) Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,031
|
We would see a LOT more Challengers if the SRT8 was more like $32k like the SS is. I suspect the SRT8 would've been a lot closer to the SS in price if the SS had come out first. I think Dodge thought they could get away with charging $42k because at the time the Challenger was basically the only game in that part of town. For a number of reasons, it looks like the R/T doesn't cross-shop too well against the SS and 5.0. But now that the 5.0 and SS are out, Dodge either could re-position the SRT8 to try and compete with the GT500 or slash the price. They chose the former.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: challenger Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
|
Quote:
![]() oh and from reviews it seems like the 90 tq they got across certain rpms are doing wonders for this car. and the most important thing is that it looks like the suspension tweaks really make this car feel and drive like a true muscle car. |
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2008 Challenger SRT/8 runs 11s | Wm Holden | Off-topic Discussions | 31 | 05-11-2009 10:31 AM |
| Hennessy Challenger runs 11.9... | 454lsxss | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 17 | 09-08-2008 11:03 AM |
| Comparison Test, by Proxy: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8 | AirGoya | Chevy Camaro vs... | 86 | 07-24-2008 11:20 AM |
| MT: Challenger and Camaro face a case of bad timing | Scotsman | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 16 | 06-03-2008 01:45 PM |
| 2009 Dodge Challenger Press Release (introducing model lineup) | Tran | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 8 | 03-20-2008 12:47 AM |