|
|
#15 | |
|
Snackbar Tuning
Drives: 2023 SGM ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,522
|
Quote:
22 seems pretty safe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: 2020 Chevy Camaro ZL1 1LE Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,350
|
22 degrees on that combo is very reasonable. Might be worth trying an extra degree on the dyno to see if the combo likes it.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Drives: 2020 Chevy Camaro ZL1 1LE Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 137
|
Thanks for confirming! My tuner actually stopped at 20* since this was his 1st time tuning a port injection setup on stock heads and cam so I know he is just trying to be safe. But the car just wasn't where I thought it should be, so after talking with a few guys on here with the knowledge and reading alot. I decided to throw 2 more degree in myself. Now the car is where I think it should be and maybe with a little more to go. No dyno numbers but did do some 60-130 dragy pulls as measurement and consistent improvement. I went 6.0 at 18*, 5.9 at 19*, 5.65 at 20*, and best was 5.4 at 22*. All with similar DA and Temp. Maybe 5.2 at 24*? lol but I'm nervous to throw that much in as I am not a tuner lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Moderator
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: New Ipswich NH
Posts: 6,350
|
Quote:
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, ATI 8L90, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors & BB HPFP, TooHighPSI/Katech port injection, 15” conversion 1066 WHP STD/1027 SAE, 9.10@152.5 (new times coming)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Drives: 2020 Chevy Camaro ZL1 1LE Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 137
|
I think you are correct one the base timing of 13-14. Right now my flex fuel timing is like 9 lol. I would need to bump it to 10 if I want 23 degree of timing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Snackbar Tuning
Drives: 2023 SGM ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,522
|
I wouldn't be afraid of 23-24 on that setup on E65. But to be clear, timing would be ramping up to that value and not that high on the hit. Peak timing would either start at 5600 or 6000 depending on what the dyno says. I do seem to be a little more aggressive than others on timing though. If the car stops getting faster, or barely makes anymore power on the dyno, then there is no reason to run more timing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() Drives: 2020 Chevy Camaro ZL1 1LE Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 137
|
Quote:
Last edited by Future1LE; 06-14-2023 at 06:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Snackbar Tuning
Drives: 2023 SGM ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,522
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 7,666
|
I have had some bolt-on LT4's that wouldn't run 20 degrees on pump. My guess is that the wrong octane was put in the premium tank at the filling station. Either way I prefer to run them conservative on pump gas for that reason. I do 12 degrees in the base table on 93 with stock internal LT1's and 17-19 degrees on LT4's. Then add what it takes to get to desired in the flex table.
__________________
2016 NFG SS A8/Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 HBM ZLE Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: In the garage
Posts: 891
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|