Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > I4 Turbo LTG Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-02-2017, 03:04 AM   #1
BomberCamaro
 
BomberCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro I4T/2002 Camaro Z/28
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 85
How restrictive is the stock muffler?

Just curious if anybody has any info on how much the suitcase under the trunk is holding us back aside from weight. I put a lot of highway miles on my car (2,000 a month minimum) so I would like a nice quiet drone free cabin so I can jam out to my music Definitely going catless downpipe, so a slight bit of sound is expected. l plan on shooting this car over 300whp. I know mufflers normally don't restrict a ton of power, but I've also never seen one that I could use to sail across the ocean.

If it is actually very restrictive, I'll just straight pipe it. No huge deal. I refuse to spend the money for an axleback system that is essentially just pipes with some tips and a brand name. I love the sleeper aspect and it would be nice to be more a surprise to my foes
__________________
Mechaniholics Youtube Channel-
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-o...0UYF319hF_NmKA

Follow my mod journey!

So far... 20x9.5 Curva Concepts C-300, Injen 7300 CAI, ZZP Catless Downpipe, RPM charge pipe, 67mm TB, ZZP tune, Snow meth injection, muffler delete, RPI Designs front splitter, black SS spoiler, tinted windows, black bowties, and driver mod.

Instagram- @Arctic_Blast_Camaro
BomberCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 05:34 AM   #2
Bluecyclone
 
Bluecyclone's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Cyclone mustang
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Port Lavaca,Tx.
Posts: 355
Do remove the ugly mufflers and do cherry bomb like resonators. I did this to an 83 Caprice with Dynotech headers. It had 5.0 with Edlebrock aluminum intake, Edlebrock 600 cfm 4bbl carb, Accel ingition, and other mods for a Chauffeur car I built in Houston,Tx. It was stolen and never found.
__________________
2014 Cyclone/Select Shift/"/Sold
2016 ruby red GT w/3.55:1/resonator delete X- pipe/UPR catch can/Airaid "tube"W/AEM/J&M/BigWorm/BMR /SVE /ZL1addons/Redline/Steeda/BG fluids/

Last edited by Bluecyclone; 05-02-2017 at 05:35 AM. Reason: spelling
Bluecyclone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 09:12 AM   #3
rickwelch69
 
rickwelch69's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Turbo 4
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Glendale, AZ 85301
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by BomberCamaro View Post
Just curious if anybody has any info on how much the suitcase under the trunk is holding us back aside from weight. I put a lot of highway miles on my car (2,000 a month minimum) so I would like a nice quiet drone free cabin so I can jam out to my music Definitely going catless downpipe, so a slight bit of sound is expected. l plan on shooting this car over 300whp. I know mufflers normally don't restrict a ton of power, but I've also never seen one that I could use to sail across the ocean.

If it is actually very restrictive, I'll just straight pipe it. No huge deal. I refuse to spend the money for an axleback system that is essentially just pipes with some tips and a brand name. I love the sleeper aspect and it would be nice to be more a surprise to my foes

I did a catless downpipe and still have the stock exhaust, most everything I've seen online about restriction says little or none. my exhaust sounds great and with age will only sound better! the weight factor for me is that this car is just about perfectly balanced front to rear and corner to corner and I LOVE the way it handles, so will keep BIG muffler so the balance stays the same, otherwise that would be more weight on the front. as for see that big ass muffler from the back? I just sprayed it with matte black engine paint, cannot even see it now. If I paid 800+ for an exhaust system and it sounded like stock or crap that would SUCK! $$ better spent in other areas......my 2 cents
__________________
2016 2.0 RS::K&N drop-in filter::RPM Catless down pipe::RPM Tune::Mishimoto Hot&Cold side charge pipes::65ish mm throttle body::289rwhp/328lbft
rickwelch69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 09:26 AM   #4
Michigan1LTRS
Blessed ❤️
 
Michigan1LTRS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 1LT RS I4
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,577
Amen Rick!!
__________________
2017 1LT RS I4 A8 BLACK ON BLACK
Kindness and compassion #OthersFirst
Michigan1LTRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2017, 12:04 PM   #5
Adp2017
 
Adp2017's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 RS Turbo
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Posts: 376
Mishimoto ran test and noticed no restriction compared to their catback exhaust. I have a catted DP installed for a week now and put 1000km's on it. The exhaust sound has depended and there is some nice pops and burbles coming from the stock suitcase now. If I didn't already throw down some good $$ for a magnaflow catback I would keep stock exhaust and paint it black like rickwelch69 did.
__________________
2017 1LT | RS | 2.0T | M6

331 rwhp , 350 rwtq

ZZP Intercooler | ZZP Catted DP | Magnaflow Catback | Injen CAI | Tuned (BBR) | CNC Honed Turbo (TPC) w 14lb actuator
Adp2017 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 01:12 AM   #6
BomberCamaro
 
BomberCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro I4T/2002 Camaro Z/28
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickwelch69 View Post
I did a catless downpipe and still have the stock exhaust, most everything I've seen online about restriction says little or none. my exhaust sounds great and with age will only sound better! the weight factor for me is that this car is just about perfectly balanced front to rear and corner to corner and I LOVE the way it handles, so will keep BIG muffler so the balance stays the same, otherwise that would be more weight on the front. as for see that big ass muffler from the back? I just sprayed it with matte black engine paint, cannot even see it now. If I paid 800+ for an exhaust system and it sounded like stock or crap that would SUCK! $$ better spent in other areas......my 2 cents
That's an awesome idea Rick, I'll probably go the same route. Thanks for the input!
__________________
Mechaniholics Youtube Channel-
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-o...0UYF319hF_NmKA

Follow my mod journey!

So far... 20x9.5 Curva Concepts C-300, Injen 7300 CAI, ZZP Catless Downpipe, RPM charge pipe, 67mm TB, ZZP tune, Snow meth injection, muffler delete, RPI Designs front splitter, black SS spoiler, tinted windows, black bowties, and driver mod.

Instagram- @Arctic_Blast_Camaro
BomberCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 02:37 AM   #7
ChicagoTommy

 
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adp2017 View Post
Mishimoto ran test and noticed no restriction compared to their catback exhaust. I have a catted DP installed for a week now and put 1000km's on it. The exhaust sound has depended and there is some nice pops and burbles coming from the stock suitcase now. If I didn't already throw down some good $$ for a magnaflow catback I would keep stock exhaust and paint it black like rickwelch69 did.
That doesn't seem right to me. There are only 2 possible theories. Either GM mad a BAMF hella flowing exhaust from the factory, which is unlikely. Or Mishi who last I checked wasn't an exhaust company, has a product with poor flow. That seems much more likely. Why would anyone fork over their hard earned money for an exhaust that doesn't flow better than stock? That would be downright negligent.

To the OP, just keep the stock muffler if you drive that much per month and don't want to listen to drone. I'd advise you to either install an electric, or a boost referenced exhaust cut out right after the downpipe. You would pick up more flow and RWHP, and you can keep the car quiet for those long rides.
ChicagoTommy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 02:53 AM   #8
BomberCamaro
 
BomberCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro I4T/2002 Camaro Z/28
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 85
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoTommy View Post
That doesn't seem right to me. There are only 2 possible theories. Either GM mad a BAMF hella flowing exhaust from the factory, which is unlikely. Or Mishi who last I checked wasn't an exhaust company, has a product with poor flow. That seems much more likely. Why would anyone fork over their hard earned money for an exhaust that doesn't flow better than stock? That would be downright negligent.

To the OP, just keep the stock muffler if you drive that much per month and don't want to listen to drone. I'd advise you to either install an electric, or a boost referenced exhaust cut out right after the downpipe. You would pick up more flow and RWHP, and you can keep the car quiet for those long rides.
I have to agree with you that either Mishimoto fell short on designing an exhaust system, or there was some false info posted somewhere for him to find. Like you I agree there is an extremely small chance that GM got it perfect with that large of an application haha.

Regardless, I had considered an electric cutout, but have heard many stories of the motors burning up in them from exhaust heat, some as early as a few months after install. I know QTP makes a nice product, but the thought of it going toast on me sways me away from that route. I'll have to do some research on boost referenced cutouts.
__________________
Mechaniholics Youtube Channel-
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-o...0UYF319hF_NmKA

Follow my mod journey!

So far... 20x9.5 Curva Concepts C-300, Injen 7300 CAI, ZZP Catless Downpipe, RPM charge pipe, 67mm TB, ZZP tune, Snow meth injection, muffler delete, RPI Designs front splitter, black SS spoiler, tinted windows, black bowties, and driver mod.

Instagram- @Arctic_Blast_Camaro

Last edited by BomberCamaro; 05-03-2017 at 06:54 AM.
BomberCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 06:18 AM   #9
DarkFangz1100
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoTommy View Post
That doesn't seem right to me. There are only 2 possible theories. Either GM mad a BAMF hella flowing exhaust from the factory, which is unlikely. Or Mishi who last I checked wasn't an exhaust company, has a product with poor flow. That seems much more likely. Why would anyone fork over their hard earned money for an exhaust that doesn't flow better than stock? That would be downright negligent.

To the OP, just keep the stock muffler if you drive that much per month and don't want to listen to drone. I'd advise you to either install an electric, or a boost referenced exhaust cut out right after the downpipe. You would pick up more flow and RWHP, and you can keep the car quiet for those long rides.
I think Mishimoto fell off with the exhaust because I bugged them for about 3 weeks requesting an update but the guy never replied to the thread but posted on others. So, I have lost all faith with their exhaust production.
DarkFangz1100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 08:34 AM   #10
Ashium
 
Drives: Camaro 2.0t, 300zx TT, LSTT Mustang
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Miami Fl
Posts: 109
I don't think anyone has measured out the stock system in detail. It seems the stock system is a 3" that y's into 2, 2.25" pipes. Two 2.25" pipes is bigger (not by much) then a single 3". In other words, You are not really going to find any power in the stock pipes. It's kind of hard to believe the muffler alone could be that big of a restriction. I'd like to see a muffler cut open, but I don't think Mishi was wrong.

Weight reduction in the system would more then likely be the biggest advantage.
Ashium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 11:18 AM   #11
Corner carver

 
Corner carver's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashiu View Post
I don't think anyone has measured out the stock system in detail. It seems the stock system is a 3" that y's into 2, 2.25" pipes. Two 2.25" pipes is bigger (not by much) then a single 3". In other words, You are not really going to find any power in the stock pipes. It's kind of hard to believe the muffler alone could be that big of a restriction. I'd like to see a muffler cut open, but I don't think Mishi was wrong.

Weight reduction in the system would more then likely be the biggest advantage.
If its anything like the new mazda miata's suitcase it just dumps the exhaust into that giant chamber and lets the flow figure its own path out the two tips... Far from effecient, but likely great at sound suppression and cheap as dirt for GM to use...
__________________
As Delivered: 2017 Mosaic Black 1LT RS 2.0T | M6 | HD brake and cooling | Bose & 8"screen | Front lip extension | Blade spolier | Black bowties | Painted splash guards
Installed Mods: 25% Window tint | Headlight, side marker and third brake light Phastek tint kit | GM black taillights with Gen5diy LED harness and bulbs | LED license plate bulbs | Gorilla lug nuts, black | GM 'performance' center caps | RS and sheild badges removed
Corner carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 11:22 AM   #12
Corner carver

 
Corner carver's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,827
Stock Miata muffler showen on the bottom... I'm assuming ours is similar
Attached Images
 
__________________
As Delivered: 2017 Mosaic Black 1LT RS 2.0T | M6 | HD brake and cooling | Bose & 8"screen | Front lip extension | Blade spolier | Black bowties | Painted splash guards
Installed Mods: 25% Window tint | Headlight, side marker and third brake light Phastek tint kit | GM black taillights with Gen5diy LED harness and bulbs | LED license plate bulbs | Gorilla lug nuts, black | GM 'performance' center caps | RS and sheild badges removed
Corner carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 11:41 AM   #13
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
I'll stand on the stock muffler is restrictive as hell side of the room. not to mention heavy and ugly as sin. I don't expect gains off of most cat-backs with this car but better sound and flow are 100% expected mishimotos leave a lot to be desired and I really do like them just this may have been a step in the wrong direction for them. As for drone axle-backs without modification of the stock midpipe shouldn't have any drone if you replace the mid-pipes they may drone not sure. As for cutouts i'm still so very torn on these I love the idea and understand the concept on what they're suppose to help with. I was looking at QTP's then took a look at the Noweeds diverter and find myself leaning closer to noweeds if I can confirm fiment of the universal application.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2017, 11:59 AM   #14
Joe_A
 
Drives: Searching
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Denver, NC
Posts: 9
Anyone that replaced the suitcase muffler still have the original one laying around.
My be worth cutting opening up and seeing what is inside the original muffler. Might be able to remove some baffles and insulation and get something that sounds better and less restrictive for a lot less money just by modifying the stock muffler
Joe_A is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.