[Roto-fab 1]

Originally Posted by ender2664

Roto-fab is about 60% more than the k&n. I don't mind paying extra for the Roto-fab if it is a superior product but the only thing I'm hearing is k&n is "unproven", which to me simply means people here and vendors have not tested it.

Originally Posted by Megahurtz

"You get what you pay for" has never been more true when its applied to modifying cars. I would personally keep my stock intake rather than buy the K&N intake.

There are only two aftermarket solutions I would even consider based on performance and looks. I won't comment on either but if you do your research you will find a lot of info on them on the forum here.

Originally Posted by pinoyscorpion951

First he said it just plain looked better under the hood than the K and N and he mentioned that the quality of materials appeared better. He said if performance numbers were equal he would have chosen the Rotofab unit. I introduced him to the Camaro6 forums after he purchased his Camaro and intake and after seeing that Roto Fab was the only one that produced any verifiable 3rd party gains, he had serious buyers remorse. Tim from EFI tuning seems to like it and he's one of our resident experts on tuning here so if it gets his thumbs up of approval that's good enough for me. I got mine with the sound tube delete but the engine seems louder than stock.

Originally Posted by mgwarlock

Got a rotofab on my gen5 and very satisfied.

Originally Posted by JFM-jr

Rotofab = MAF readings do not get skewed. I am not saying I know for a fact other brands will skew the MAF numbers but it has been verified the RF does not so thats what I went with. It has also showed power on the dyno by more than one person.

Thanks for the input guys! We will always do what we can to deliver the best product possible.

Michael