Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamingat30fps
They are a car review site, I'm not sure why you seem so upset they point out the poor visibility. Not like they are lying it has horrible visibility and I think its worth mention in a review of the car. They also mentioned a bunch of positive things about the car.  |
Because it has been endlessly, incessantly, beaten to death since the first review months ago. It's a sports car for one, and for two, there already exists a Mustang, with different styling and different pros/cons. You hardly ever hear anyone griping about the extra body roll from the Mustang because it's understood it's a GT car, and probably will have some extra body roll as a by product of making it a better cruising machine. This is the exact same thing as it being understandable the Camaro has restricted visibility because it is, was, and hopefully always will be a highly stylized/fun/more sports car oriented alternative to the Mustang. We don't need clones of the same thing from two manufacturers. The Camaro sold perfectly well just as is in the 5th gen. I do t understand why hardly anyone gets that you are going to have some sacrifices with any car, regardless of price range. It's impossible to retain these exact looks AND have improved visibility. Again, everyone who has that big of an issue can absolutely purchase a Mustang/Challenger. It doesn't exactly keep me up at night; I'm just extremely tired of hearing the same BS by almost everyone in almost every review.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk