Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323
you're missing the point. That is all.
You try to argue the whole 300-400 lb argument then when I prove you wrong you move down to the v6 weight lol.
w.e facts are:
both cars were built on existing platforms(lx and zeta to save money)
both have IRS
both used existing engines from existing models.
price of camaro is unknown and might end up being close to the challenger price but it Will be cheaper. But by how much?
the big difference imo is:
the interior of the camaro looks like a ricer with all that plastic imo.
the car is tiny IMO it looks like a saturn sky. rear is too small and so is the front. I am so glad dodge went with the lx because it looks like a true muscle car.
the rear of the camaro looks like a fugly vette, shouldve stuck with the long likes of the old camaro imo.
BTW do some research the challenger starts at 3720 curb weight.
you are still cool though lol.
|
ahhhemm.... ok... here it goes.
A. The challys curb weight is 3720? is that the one with 80 hp?
And when your comparing the V6 it IS 300 - 400 is it not??
B. The Chally's platform is the biggest reason the car will flop and die off before the camaro or the mustang.
it was a mistake and chrysler should have thought about this before making it.
The camaro's Zeta platform is brand new. And it wasnt for saving money, one of the biggest reason's Zeta was made was for Cars like the Camaro... how many years has the 300 and charger been sitting on the challengers?
C. The price of the Camaro WILL be cheaper, GM isnt going under as fast as Dodge is.
D. the interior of the Camaro looks like a ricer... you know... this single handidly might invalidate your entire argument ha.
have you ever even been in a ricer car?? or better yet... have you ever even been in a 69' Camaro??? you know, the one the interior is modled after??
seriously, its almost hard to reply to this, seeing as Dodge gives the world the most bland, PLASTIC, and Boring interior's that you could possibly find in any car.
Its like years ago they drew up the interior on their first car, and the designer died.
"ahh screw it. put it in all the cars. works well enough"
E. The Camaro being a smaller car is one of the best things about it. GM didnt build the Car for YOU any more than they built it for ME. The car is for everyone, and more people preffer to drive cars that dont look like they were born near a radio-active plant.
I dont want to feel like im navigating my ship through traffic when i drive my car, i want to feel like i have more control.
the size of the chally makes it sluggish, unstable, and just horrible looking.
you may argue the older cars were just as big. thats BS. ive seen a 71' chally NEXT to a new one. the new one DWARFs the car. the only resmblance is the headlights and huge rendition of its body style.
F. The rear of the Camaro didnt hit me as being the best aspect of the car when i first saw it either. but honestly, after seeing it for such a long time, i LOVE the back of the car.
The Camaro is such a sexy car its amazing. that really is the best word for the lines on the Camaro. Sexy. its like they used a woman as the motivation towards the lines on this car.
The after burner lights on the Camaro DOMINATE the plastic crap on the back of the chally.
I wish i could say that there was ANY motivation other than, lets throw something together really fast and see if we can make some money off it, for the Dodge execs.
It really looks like a blotched job.
But you know what, its all good. this is all IMO.
