View Single Post
Old 08-20-2008, 01:10 PM   #21
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Congoman775 View Post
Camaro starts at 3700...


Chally starts at 4000...

goes to 4150....


Am i missing something ?
you're missing the point. That is all.

You try to argue the whole 300-400 lb argument then when I prove you wrong you move down to the v6 weight lol.

w.e facts are:

both cars were built on existing platforms(lx and zeta to save money)
both have IRS
both used existing engines from existing models.
price of camaro is unknown and might end up being close to the challenger price but it Will be cheaper. But by how much?

the big difference imo is:
the interior of the camaro looks like a ricer with all that plastic imo.
the car is tiny IMO it looks like a saturn sky. rear is too small and so is the front. I am so glad dodge went with the lx because it looks like a true muscle car.
the rear of the camaro looks like a fugly vette, shouldve stuck with the long likes of the old camaro imo.






BTW do some research the challenger starts at 3720 curb weight.

you are still cool though lol.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote