Quote:
Originally Posted by wnta1ss
What does your actual dyno sheet look like? Because this one being 46 mph to 142 mph, in an M6 car with different gear ratios than your A8 car, and with different tires than yours as well, means that your drawing is very much apples to oranges, in other words, bogus. Would need RPM-based graphs from both in order to pretend-overlay like you did. Yes I am pointing out that even if your dyno operator screwed up like this one, and gave you a speed-based dyno sheet instead of the correct rpm-based, the fact that your gearing does not match his would invalidate a straight comparison of mph vs power.
|
Well, I thought this was a forum and not a PhD dissertation judging committee, hence my use of the word "hacked"
I understand this is completely invalid in a scientific sense, but if you insist on this level of accuracy, we won't be able to converse about much—my car is an A8, there is no way I can produce apples to apples test data against an M6 car, and in very few cases do we have perfectly comparable cars under the exact same conditions anyway.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq
Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle Terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods
JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune
1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18
3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18
3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18
4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18
4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18
5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18