[newmoon]

Originally Posted by ST1LE

If the Camaro's dominance being possibly at an end is a sign of failure, then how can the Mustang taking this long to be competitive not a failure?

You LOVE talking about how one specific configuration of the Mustang GT is 'a lot' faster than any Camaro SS. Why is a lack of a competitive manual GT not a failure? Oops, I forgot we don't dare acknowledge the existence of the Manual GT due to its utterly embarrassing performance numbers.

You wear rose colored glasses when looking at the Mustang, and wonder why you're never in agreement with people on a Camaro forum. If the GT350 was really that good, worth the $, I am pretty sure you would have traded the Boss for one and wouldn't keep talking about what magazines think about it.

Good enough to praise, but not good enough to buy....got it.

Should we compare the manual numbers for the present ZL1 (and ignore the A10) to the last 13/14 GT500 as well? If so the present ZL1 is a failure as the last GT500 is faster. You compare the fastest version of the car, which is the A8 and A10.