Quote:
Originally Posted by rburke76
Maybe its time for the Camaro to go. I have a 2017 Camaro LT and I love it. It is great. For me. I love the styling, history and power. Its 2 door and it suits me fine. But that being said, The back seats are worthless. I cannot take my parents and friends in the car and drive to the beach like the challenger and mustang can. The Camaro needs more color options: orange, green metallic, brown metallic, maroon, etc…The price point is too high. They need a stripped down base V8 for $29,995 to $ 32,000. The Camaro produces too much emotion. Who cares anymore Camaro or mustang? I don’t. The Challenger sells because of its commercials, (marketing) affordability, and heritage. Plus your wife and friends or kids can jump in the challenger in the back seat and you drive to the beach. Bring back the 2 door Chevelle, 114 inch wheelbase, no visibility issues, full back seat, decent trunk space, and have plenty of engine and color options, and have a stripped, not equipped V8 for $29,995…Then you’ll sell 100,000 of them a year no problem!
Read more: http://gmauthority.com/blog/2018/01/...#ixzz53LBQi7qp |
They already tried something similar with the G8 and SS. 4 doors, but whatever. The Camaro is a sports car now. If you want a family hauler, go buy a sedan. I consider the Camaro a 2 seater with a bonus rear seat for my 5 year old or a shelf for carrying a gym bag.
I am so tired of hearing will the whining about back seat room. Nobody ever complains that a Porsche 911 has worthless rear seats. That's because people buy the 911 for performance and for sunny day fun.
The Camaro is essentially an affordable American 911.