Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2014, 05:59 PM   #1
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
12 LFX vs 13/14 Cam VVT positioning... Why so different?

Playing with HP Tuners recently and thought it would be interesting to compare the differences in the tunes from year to year... For the most part most of the stuff is just small tweaks here and there, but what appears the biggest change between 12 and 13/14 (13 and 14 are nearly identical) is the difference in the tables for the cam positions...

I've attached a picture of the WOT cam positions for both the 2012, and 2014 side by side...

The non-WOT tables are quite a bit different also, about 6 degrees max in some areas, but the WOT tables look pretty drastic to me. I can't seem to find a multiplier, or modifier that would magically bump the 2014 table up to around where the 12 is... Very strange.

Anyone have any insight on this?
Attached Images
 
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2014, 08:44 PM   #2
JantzenOKC


 
JantzenOKC's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 2LT/RS Twin Turbo
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,073
I have exactly 0 insight on this but I do remember reading that 12's had a different ecm than the 13 and 14's

Last edited by JantzenOKC; 09-16-2014 at 08:56 PM.
JantzenOKC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2014, 09:46 AM   #3
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
Quote:
Originally Posted by JantzenOKC View Post
I have exactly 0 insight on this but I do remember reading that 12's had a different ecm than the 13 and 14's
You are correct there, the 12 has an E39, where as the 13 and 14 have the E39A... Not really sure how much different it is?

I can honestly say, you don't want to try to run the 2012 cam timing tables in a 2014... I copied them into my stock 2014 tune along with the VCP spark, and it turned it into a TOTAL DOG, absolutely horrible... Looked like it might be good on paper, but not so much.

Quote:
Operation

The CMP actuator assembly has an outer housing that is driven by an engine timing chain. Inside the assembly is a rotor with fixed vanes that is attached to the camshaft. Oil pressure that is applied to the fixed vanes will rotate a specific camshaft in relationship to the crankshaft. The movement of the intake camshafts will advance the intake valve timing. The movement of the exhaust camshafts will retard the exhaust valve timing. When oil pressure is applied to the return side of the vanes, the camshafts will return to 0 crankshaft degrees, or top dead center (TDC). The CMP actuator solenoid valve directs the oil flow that controls the camshaft movement. The ECM commands the CMP solenoid to move the solenoid plunger and spool valve until oil flows from the advance passage (11). Oil flowing thru the CMP actuator assembly from the CMP solenoid advance passage applies pressure to the advance side of the vanes in the CMP actuator assembly. When the camshaft position is retarded, the CMP actuator solenoid valve directs oil to flow into the CMP actuator assembly from the retard passage (3). The ECM can also command the CMP actuator solenoid valve to stop oil flow from both passages in order to hold the current camshaft position.]
ALLDATA Info from a 2013.
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2014, 10:26 AM   #4
ChibiBlackSheep

 
ChibiBlackSheep's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS/RS, 1968 SS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southeast, PA
Posts: 2,099
Are these all from the same model/trim?

For example are they all 1LS models, or all 2LS models? Do you know?

I wonder if your 2012 is actually a 2LS and the rest aren't, and the small change can help EPA or something
__________________
LS3 Crate Engine Swap | CSP Custom Cam 232/240 .615/.615 113 +3 | Stainless Power LT Headers | Z28 Intake | Borla S-Type Exhaust | FTI Triple-Disc Billet 3200 Stall
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS | 1968 Camaro SS | 2020 Cadillac CT5 Premium Luxury | 2021 Spark LS

ChibiBlackSheep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2014, 10:36 AM   #5
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
Both the 2012 and my 2014 file appear to be Automatic, 1LT trim cars.

The 2013 file I have appears to be a 2LS, but the cam timing on the 13 vs 14 @ WOT is exactly the same, the part throttle tables, and 99% the same.

I wonder if the AllData info I highlighted in red works the opposite way in the 2012/e39, ie the Intake cam starts fully advanced, and gets retarted as the numbers climb in the tables, VS maybe starting fully retarded in the 14/e39a and get advanced, which is why the numbers from the 12 don't work in a 14?

I have no clue. But I'd like to learn.
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2015, 02:00 PM   #6
IneedAZ


 
IneedAZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1 A10 & 2021 BMW M340i x Dr
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tampa
Posts: 5,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@JacFab View Post
Playing with HP Tuners recently and thought it would be interesting to compare the differences in the tunes from year to year... For the most part most of the stuff is just small tweaks here and there, but what appears the biggest change between 12 and 13/14 (13 and 14 are nearly identical) is the difference in the tables for the cam positions...

I've attached a picture of the WOT cam positions for both the 2012, and 2014 side by side...

The non-WOT tables are quite a bit different also, about 6 degrees max in some areas, but the WOT tables look pretty drastic to me. I can't seem to find a multiplier, or modifier that would magically bump the 2014 table up to around where the 12 is... Very strange.

Anyone have any insight on this?
Jason, what tab are these tables listed under?
__________________
Sold 2012 2LT RS 12.3@112 old setup

Sold 1967 Camaro Pro Street. Ran 10's mild BB on NOS.

2017 HyperBlue ZL1 A10 ** Born 3/17/17**Delivered 4/08/17
2020 Build: Mag2650, BTR Stage2, NW103, BG, 14% lower, 90mm upper, ARH 2" Long system w/no cats, SW Legend mufflers. **807hp/762tq on 93 gas** and **848hp/792tq on e47**

Sold 2018 (Go Mango) Dodge Charger Daytona 392 Daily Driver

Daily Driver 2021 BMW M340i Xdrive
IneedAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 11:02 AM   #7
Jason@JacFab
 
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
Send a message via AIM to Jason@JacFab Send a message via MSN to Jason@JacFab
ENGINE > AIRFLOW > VARIABLE CAM SHAFT

The tables shown are the WOT, there is also a bigger table for part throttle driving for LOW/MED/HIGH which is based on barometric pressure.
Jason@JacFab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 12:44 PM   #8
IneedAZ


 
IneedAZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1 A10 & 2021 BMW M340i x Dr
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tampa
Posts: 5,111
thanks
__________________
Sold 2012 2LT RS 12.3@112 old setup

Sold 1967 Camaro Pro Street. Ran 10's mild BB on NOS.

2017 HyperBlue ZL1 A10 ** Born 3/17/17**Delivered 4/08/17
2020 Build: Mag2650, BTR Stage2, NW103, BG, 14% lower, 90mm upper, ARH 2" Long system w/no cats, SW Legend mufflers. **807hp/762tq on 93 gas** and **848hp/792tq on e47**

Sold 2018 (Go Mango) Dodge Charger Daytona 392 Daily Driver

Daily Driver 2021 BMW M340i Xdrive
IneedAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 07:54 PM   #9
norris_83
 
Drives: Chevrolet Corvette C6 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 49
No matter what values are set at, there is always more power to be had with playing with these tables.

GM retards and advances their cam profiling for mileage. I've gained at least 15whp from tuning these tables alone on a bolt on car.
norris_83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 08:16 PM   #10
IneedAZ


 
IneedAZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1 A10 & 2021 BMW M340i x Dr
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tampa
Posts: 5,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by norris_83 View Post
No matter what values are set at, there is always more power to be had with playing with these tables.

GM retards and advances their cam profiling for mileage. I've gained at least 15whp from tuning these tables alone on a bolt on car.
Did you find you increased or decreased or both the factory numbers
__________________
Sold 2012 2LT RS 12.3@112 old setup

Sold 1967 Camaro Pro Street. Ran 10's mild BB on NOS.

2017 HyperBlue ZL1 A10 ** Born 3/17/17**Delivered 4/08/17
2020 Build: Mag2650, BTR Stage2, NW103, BG, 14% lower, 90mm upper, ARH 2" Long system w/no cats, SW Legend mufflers. **807hp/762tq on 93 gas** and **848hp/792tq on e47**

Sold 2018 (Go Mango) Dodge Charger Daytona 392 Daily Driver

Daily Driver 2021 BMW M340i Xdrive
IneedAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 08:42 PM   #11
norris_83
 
Drives: Chevrolet Corvette C6 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by IneedAZ View Post
Did you find you increased or decreased or both the factory numbers
all depends on what mods you have on your vehicle. To pin point whats best, you'll need a dyno. On a C7 decreasing the values at higher rpms gained us power.

On a Gen5 pick up with a VVT cam, increasing the values actually increased around 28wtq!

https://instagram.com/p/8G-pTem8nd/?taken-by=mep_q8
norris_83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2015, 09:26 AM   #12
qcman

 
qcman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS RDP Tuned L99
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ottawa, Canada eh?
Posts: 1,889
I know nothing about tuning but I was thinking this could have been changed to correct some of the many v6 misfire issues I've read about on here?
qcman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2015, 04:25 PM   #13
IneedAZ


 
IneedAZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1 A10 & 2021 BMW M340i x Dr
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tampa
Posts: 5,111
So, anybody mod these on a v6?
__________________
Sold 2012 2LT RS 12.3@112 old setup

Sold 1967 Camaro Pro Street. Ran 10's mild BB on NOS.

2017 HyperBlue ZL1 A10 ** Born 3/17/17**Delivered 4/08/17
2020 Build: Mag2650, BTR Stage2, NW103, BG, 14% lower, 90mm upper, ARH 2" Long system w/no cats, SW Legend mufflers. **807hp/762tq on 93 gas** and **848hp/792tq on e47**

Sold 2018 (Go Mango) Dodge Charger Daytona 392 Daily Driver

Daily Driver 2021 BMW M340i Xdrive
IneedAZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2015, 03:03 AM   #14
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Yes, it's one of the things I used to shave 0.7 seconds off my ET. They are used to broaden the powerband.
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.