Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-21-2015, 10:33 AM   #99
90503


 
90503's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,436
It's a classic Chevy move....Entry level up to top-of-the line....The more offered in between, the more potential customers who can crow about "up-grading"...

You can't take an engine like the V-6 which represented the vast majority of Camaro sales and just kick it to the curb because something else comes along....GM has developed this new V-6 and other variants including a TT....You could argue that the LT1 isn't needed if they used the TT-V6...It may very well be added to the Camaro choices at some point, but it won't mean that the V-8 will not be offered..

The V-6 has been the number one seller and will continue to do well...
90503 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 10:39 AM   #100
Angrybird 12
7 year Cancer Survivor!
 
Angrybird 12's Avatar
 
Drives: 17 Cruze RS, 07 G6 GT, 99 Astro
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 21,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90503 View Post
It's a classic Chevy move....Entry level up to top-of-the line....The more offered in between, the more potential customers who can crow about "up-grading"...

You can't take an engine like the V-6 which represented the vast majority of Camaro sales and just kick it to the curb because something else comes along....GM has developed this new V-6 and other variants including a TT....You could argue that the LT1 isn't needed if they used the TT-V6...It may very well be added to the Camaro choices at some point, but it won't mean that the V-8 will not be offered..

The V-6 has been the number one seller and will continue to do well...
It's a good idea to keep both for a couple years to see where buyer preferences are. I am sure if the Turbo 4 sells twice the rate of the V6 then you can say byebye to the V6, but to drop it right off the bat would be taking a big gamble with the potential to lose customers over to Ford which still offers the V6.
It would be like dropping the v8 if they put the twin turbo
v6 in the Camaro, too big a chance it would bite them in the ass.
__________________
Cancer's a bitch! Enjoy life while you can! LIVE, LOVE, DRIVE...
The Bird is the word!
Angrybird 12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 10:50 AM   #101
xgnxs
 
xgnxs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Cobalt Base - 5 speed
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 444
I can see the average buyer "stepping up" to the V6 since it has more horsepower (less torque not even being a concern - most people know horsepower and that's it) while not wanting to pay the extra for an SS. As has been stated many times, the average person is not an enthusiast and will never see this or any other car forum, and the best selling camaros are nicely optioned V6s. Could the best selling 6th gen camaros be nicely optioned turbo 4s? Sure. But again, I can see the average person stepping up.
xgnxs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 11:03 AM   #102
90503


 
90503's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angrybird 12 View Post
It's a good idea to keep both for a couple years to see where buyer preferences are. I am sure if the Turbo 4 sells twice the rate of the V6 then you can say byebye to the V6, but to drop it right off the bat would be taking a big gamble.
Pretty much for the last 5 years the V-6 Camaro has outsold the V-8 by 2 to 1....yet the V-8 is in no danger of being discontinued. If the V-6, or any engine, sells in reasonable numbers, it will be made....

Even if the I-4 does outsell the V-6 by twice as much, it won't be enough reason to discontinue it.
90503 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 11:36 AM   #103
Angrybird 12
7 year Cancer Survivor!
 
Angrybird 12's Avatar
 
Drives: 17 Cruze RS, 07 G6 GT, 99 Astro
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 21,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90503 View Post
Pretty much for the last 5 years the V-6 Camaro has outsold the V-8 by 2 to 1....yet the V-8 is in no danger of being discontinued. If the V-6, or any engine, sells in reasonable numbers, it will be made....

Even if the I-4 does outsell the V-6 by twice as much, it won't be enough reason to discontinue it.
There are other reasons other than sales to keep the V8, but with two engines close to the same performance and economy it would be more logical to keep the best seller. If the sales are close I think both engines will stay.
__________________
Cancer's a bitch! Enjoy life while you can! LIVE, LOVE, DRIVE...
The Bird is the word!
Angrybird 12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 11:45 AM   #104
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@JacFab View Post
...

I'm saying, I would personally be pretty happy spending 3k on the 4 cyl to run mid to high 12s, rather than 8-9k on a v6. This would be MY personal preference over the v6.
Just my opinion, but I believe this generation, we will see bolt on/tuned/tires V6ers hitting very high 12s like the Mustang V6 has done in the previous generation. With 350+ HP (after some mods and a tune), and a little weight reduction, the new V6 will have the same, if not a hair better weight/HP ratio than the current L99 SS. If the V6 really does lose around 250lbs over the current base V6, it won't need any weight reduction to have the same weight/HP ratio.

Nitrous/FI V6ers should see high 11s to mid 12s easily.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 12:05 PM   #105
Ragnar
Destroyed by flooding
 
Ragnar's Avatar
 
Drives: Wife's car
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,673
This thread is refreshing me.
__________________
Ragnar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 12:14 PM   #106
csw.live
 

Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 20
Maybe GM will offer some type of Stage 1 upgrade for the turbo 4...

Didn't they do that with the Cobalt SS?
csw.live is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 02:14 PM   #107
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Eh...

I apparently kicked a hornets nest...

So ya i'm not a fan of the 4 cylinder myself thats all i'm saying i know they are fast when tuned the arguements been made back and forth in this thread i started. Sorry mods didn't mean it to get that heated on the subject. My honest opinion and it's just that an opinion wether you deem it right or wrong is your problem is that the V6 was handed it's ass in the 5th Gen release because it was near impossible to find a tuner for it the LLT with the Bosch ECU it killed the mod market for the 5th Gen V6 and i know we've seen awesome numbers from SC/TT and Nitrous out of it on both the LLT and easier to tune LFX platforms but had their been more tuning options on release there would have been less hate towards the V6 overall coming into this generation of camaro. I wanna know what the word is on this i think it would settle alot of peoples nerves knowing they didn't screw the V6 out of the gate again i hope someone from GM will chime in.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 02:34 PM   #108
Angrybird 12
7 year Cancer Survivor!
 
Angrybird 12's Avatar
 
Drives: 17 Cruze RS, 07 G6 GT, 99 Astro
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 21,547
Evil I don't think it's gotten out of hand, just a lot of discussions going on... What perplexes me is all the hate for the V6. I mean the SS guys don't like it and the Turbo 4 guys don't like it, I have never said there shouldn't be a 4 cylinder or V8 Camaro but others say there shouldn't be a V6. I would welcome even more engine choices. I was actually wishing they would offer a 400hp V8 option for the LT models. But I guess that would open up a bigger can of worms...
__________________
Cancer's a bitch! Enjoy life while you can! LIVE, LOVE, DRIVE...
The Bird is the word!
Angrybird 12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 03:27 PM   #109
Evil-Bee-NH
603 Camaros
 
Evil-Bee-NH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 NGM I4 1LT Coupe
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 6,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angrybird 12 View Post
Evil I don't think it's gotten out of hand, just a lot of discussions going on... What perplexes me is all the hate for the V6. I mean the SS guys don't like it and the Turbo 4 guys don't like it, I have never said there shouldn't be a 4 cylinder or V8 Camaro but others say there shouldn't be a V6. I would welcome even more engine choices. I was actually wishing they would offer a 400hp V8 option for the LT models. But I guess that would open up a bigger can of worms...
Haters are gonna hate sadly. The FI 4 Cylinder guys will always hate the 6 cylinder same with the V8 guys because there's less of a gap between the 6 and 8 then the 4 and 8 i'm just hoping GM decided to make the ECU's all uniform this time and not screw us all. Frankly the 6 cylinder that is easily as tuneable as the 8 and 4 would help drive everyones sales regardless of engine.
__________________

MY 2017 I4 CAMARO BUILD JOURNAL | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM | 316RWHP - 385 RWTQ HPTUNERS DYNO TUNE | 12.693s @ 105MPH 1/4 Mile
Evil-Bee-NH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 03:34 PM   #110
suzook

 
Drives: camaro
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Stony Brook,NY
Posts: 1,756
While I understand having choices, but I don't understand getting a v6, or i4, then dumping all that $ for more HP, instead of just getting the v8 in the first place.
__________________
2016 2SS,A8,NAV,NPP,MAG Ride,Sunroof
Hyperblue/JetBlack
suzook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 04:09 PM   #111
laborsmith


 
Drives: 1969 Corvair, 2018 Camaro T4 RS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Detroit Metropolitan Area
Posts: 2,881
GM does not condone tuning engine control units and anyone who believes otherwise must start sharing whatever they are smoking.

"Nuff said.

Laborsmith
laborsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2015, 04:18 PM   #112
Mr Twisty


 
Mr Twisty's Avatar
 
Drives: the 2nd amendment home
Join Date: May 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 14,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil-Bee-NH View Post
Haters are gonna hate sadly. The FI 4 Cylinder guys will always hate the 6 cylinder same with the V8 guys because there's less of a gap between the 6 and 8 then the 4 and 8 i'm just hoping GM decided to make the ECU's all uniform this time and not screw us all. Frankly the 6 cylinder that is easily as tuneable as the 8 and 4 would help drive everyones sales regardless of engine.
Haters ARE gonna hate, but don't put me in that box, I like them all! And I'm not the only one.

You have a I4 and want to park it next to my 6 or 8 or blown 800hp BA Special, that's cool. We'll sit and talk about them all day long as long as you're not a donk.

If you are a donk with a loaded ZL1 that thinks your exhaust don't smell like everyone elses, keep on driving. Don't even have the time of day for you.

(just a generalization, not aimed at anyone in particular)
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin

Last edited by Mr Twisty; 05-21-2015 at 05:53 PM.
Mr Twisty is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.