Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > V8 LT1 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-28-2017, 11:00 PM   #1
timmy8784
Drippin' Wet Auto Detail
 
timmy8784's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 570
Heat causes loss of 80rwhp???

Hi all,

First off, I am not an expert when it comes to dynos and numbers, just understand the basics.

I completed a custom NPP exhaust on my SS recently eliminating the secondary cats and using magnaflow straight through mufflers.

Before the exhaust project, the shop threw the car on their dyno and it made 380rwhp. Now (2 months later) I brought it back to them for another run. Now I know different factors make a difference, but after 2 runs, it topped out at 302rwhp. Temperature difference then from now was 82 degrees then and 105 today. The shop is stating that the temperature change caused this drop but this seems quite ridiculous. What could be the cause of this massive drop? Can outside temp really affect that much?

Hoping someone with some more knowledge can chime in on this. Thanks!
timmy8784 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2017, 11:25 PM   #2
Blk16SS
 
Blk16SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Chevy Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Dallas,Tx
Posts: 259
VERY possible too lose a few ponies do to heat soak but it sounds like something is wrong..
Blk16SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 06:31 AM   #3
RCF
 
Drives: '17 2SS, NGM, MRC, DPP; '19 F150
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Katy (Houston), TX
Posts: 440
So, that would say take it back when it's like 40F and you'll see 500hp... total BS! From just the temperature change alone (assuming no other changes, and dyno runs done similarly), the HP difference would not even be 8hp, let alone 80hp!

Heat soak would be another matter, but 80hp is still absurd!
RCF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 06:52 AM   #4
STEVE41
 
Drives: 2016 SS
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: PHOENIX
Posts: 156
your car was heat soak, this is the same trick some shop will do to show a low # before any mods, after mods will show some crazy gain....lol you should be around 400rwhp WITHOUT heat soak.
STEVE41 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 08:25 AM   #5
SomeGeoffGuy

 
SomeGeoffGuy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 2SS Convertible
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,100
Did they give you corrected numbers? I thought they could punch something in that accounted for the temperature and barometric pressure. It might even say it on your graph. If both runs are corrected, then you have something wrong.

-Geoff
__________________
'12 2SS RS Convertible - Traded in.
'16 2SS Convertible - White on white, mag-ride, NPP, nav. Sold!
'23 2SS Convertible -Same as above except orange.
SomeGeoffGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 09:43 AM   #6
timmy8784
Drippin' Wet Auto Detail
 
timmy8784's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeGeoffGuy View Post
Did they give you corrected numbers? I thought they could punch something in that accounted for the temperature and barometric pressure. It might even say it on your graph. If both runs are corrected, then you have something wrong.

-Geoff
Nope, no corrected numbers.

They said we will have to try again when the weather conditions are similar to what they were the first time
timmy8784 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 10:51 AM   #7
timmy8784
Drippin' Wet Auto Detail
 
timmy8784's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 570
So obviously there is an issue, would you lean on the side of the car or the shop doing the dyno incorrectly?
timmy8784 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 12:34 PM   #8
nancygrl
雪の玉
 
nancygrl's Avatar
 
Drives: '22 Z71 RST Silverado
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South
Posts: 3,415
Yes temp, humidity, barometric pressure and altitude do effect the numbers, loosing 10 probably maybe a little bit more given the 23 degree increase in temp, but 80hp that seems like a lot.
Is your car is running the same as before? Runs smooth ?, getting similar gas mileage ?, oil life % ?, acceleration feel the same?, etc.??? Maybe there's an issue with their dyno and/or software ???
If it's possible maybe you can go to another place to get a 2nd opinion (and get corrected numbers). that may help narrow down if issue is with your car or their dyno.

Last edited by nancygrl; 06-29-2017 at 02:09 PM.
nancygrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 01:57 PM   #9
mjmenke
 
mjmenke's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Altoona Iowa
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by timmy8784 View Post
Nope, no corrected numbers.
Ask them to turn on SAE for both runs (or the older STP) correction factor and print them out. Both of these will correct for weather and give you a more consistent difference between each run.

(I've been able to do this with 3 different dyno shops)
__________________
2017 2SS Black NPP A8 - 422 HP 427 TQ
mjmenke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 02:57 PM   #10
timmy8784
Drippin' Wet Auto Detail
 
timmy8784's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by nancygrl View Post
Yes temp, humidity, barometric pressure and altitude do effect the numbers, loosing 10 probably maybe a little bit more given the 23 degree increase in temp, but 80hp that seems like a lot.
Is your car is running the same as before? Runs smooth ?, getting similar gas mileage ?, oil life % ?, acceleration feel the same?, etc.??? Maybe there's an issue with their dyno and/or software ???
If it's possible maybe you can go to another place to get a 2nd opinion (and get corrected numbers). that may help narrow down if issue is with your car or their dyno.
It really doesn't feel any different to me (im hoping that I would've immediately noticed if it really lost 80hp)

It runs smooth, gas mileage is almost identical, oil change actually happened in between dynos, acceleration seems the same
timmy8784 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 03:20 PM   #11
Spartan268
 
Spartan268's Avatar
 
Drives: HB 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by timmy8784 View Post
It really doesn't feel any different to me (im hoping that I would've immediately noticed if it really lost 80hp)

It runs smooth, gas mileage is almost identical, oil change actually happened in between dynos, acceleration seems the same
Something must have been off with the dyno then. Maybe it needed a re-calibration? Or someone fudged the settings up. Cause you would feel the 80rwhp difference in power when you stomp on it.
Spartan268 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 03:28 PM   #12
nancygrl
雪の玉
 
nancygrl's Avatar
 
Drives: '22 Z71 RST Silverado
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: South
Posts: 3,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by timmy8784 View Post
It really doesn't feel any different to me (im hoping that I would've immediately noticed if it really lost 80hp)

It runs smooth, gas mileage is almost identical, oil change actually happened in between dynos, acceleration seems the same
Everything else being equal....Loosing 80hp, I know you'd be able to notice/feel that difference. That's like driving a 4cyl Accord vs 6cly Accord (90hp diff.) you could tell one is down in the power dept.

Even the difference between the different "correction factors" STD vs SAE-J607 vs SAE-J1349 wouldn't account for 80hp difference, 10-15 at best. I'd have to lean towards some setting or something not input correctly.
nancygrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 03:51 PM   #13
timmy8784
Drippin' Wet Auto Detail
 
timmy8784's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by nancygrl View Post
Everything else being equal....Loosing 80hp, I know you'd be able to notice/feel that difference. That's like driving a 4cyl Accord vs 6cly Accord (90hp diff.) you could tell one is down in the power dept.

Even the difference between the different "correction factors" STD vs SAE-J607 vs SAE-J1349 wouldn't account for 80hp difference, 10-15 at best. I'd have to lean towards some setting or something not input correctly.
This is what im thinking. I find no way that the computer would do any sort of fuel adjustment due to a cat back exhaust install (someone else I talked to mentioned something like this)
timmy8784 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2017, 09:58 PM   #14
MAGAUSA
 
MAGAUSA's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Hyper Blue 1LE
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Tampa
Posts: 579
Instead of focusing on dyno numbers, have you noticed an 80+ hp loss? You would.
MAGAUSA is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.