Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-08-2017, 08:53 AM   #15
speedyman
Account Suspended
 
Drives: ATS4
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: SW PA
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkorgan View Post
We asked the question because I told Mark that it has been discussed on the forums and it would be good to ask. I think the ring time is simple a way to judge how the Camaro stacks up against the best in the world using the benchmark that most of the world uses for performance. Al said "the ring is our lab, our testing ground". It used to be willow or Milford (and to some extent it still is) but if you want to compete on the world stage, you need to go to the ring and to their credit, that is exactly what GM has done since the rebirth of the Camaro. The rest of the world traditionally mocks American sports cars but with the Camaro and Vette steadily making their way to the top of the rings leaderboard, the world has to take notice and acknowledge what the American sports car have become, a legitimate...world class supercar. I don't think a traditional Ford, Chevy, or Dodge buyer cares that much but if you are trying to peel market share from the loyal Porsche, BMW, Mercedes or Audi crowd....the ring time is a great place to start your argument.
Sure, interesting to see how Zl1s, GT350s, or whatever else stacks up against the traditional elite of the performance world.

My point is quite simple. It is highly unlikely that significant numbers of buyers if any will opt for a Euro exotic costing 2-4 times as much as a ZL1 based on a "ring time". That is just really not going to happen in numbers and that makes the "ring time" more a matter of performance trivia rather than a basis for purchase as some drumbeaters would have us believe. The C7 Z06 has never posted a "ring time" and they have sold by the tens of thousands with a devout following.
speedyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 09:25 AM   #16
Infern0
Bring It
 
Infern0's Avatar
 
Drives: In Between
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 2,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkorgan View Post
We asked the question because I told Mark that it has been discussed on the forums and it would be good to ask. I think the ring time is simple a way to judge how the Camaro stacks up against the best in the world using the benchmark that most of the world uses for performance. Al said "the ring is our lab, our testing ground". It used to be willow or Milford (and to some extent it still is) but if you want to compete on the world stage, you need to go to the ring and to their credit, that is exactly what GM has done since the rebirth of the Camaro. The rest of the world traditionally mocks American sports cars but with the Camaro and Vette steadily making their way to the top of the rings leaderboard, the world has to take notice and acknowledge what the American sports car have become, a legitimate...world class supercar. I don't think a traditional Ford, Chevy, or Dodge buyer cares that much but if you are trying to peel market share from the loyal Porsche, BMW, Mercedes or Audi crowd....the ring time is a great place to start your argument.


Being able to say you beat or tied supercars, hell even other american muscle cars is a bonus.
__________________

2017 Camaro ZL1 M6 - Everything but the sunroof - Sold

2010 Camaro SS - 650RWHP Daily Driver - Traded
Infern0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 09:29 AM   #17
hjdca
 
Drives: 2015 Z/28 Black
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 340
Note: The ride also has a lot to do with the track tires. When I took off the Trefeos and put on the MPS4S on my Z/28, the ride got way more compliant and the tram lining completely stopped... Now it just feels like a lowered pony car with a great lowered suspension that corners unreal anytime you want.. No worries on driving it every day.. It was definitely harder to drive it every day with the Trefeos.
__________________
2015 Black Z/28
70 Chevelle SS396
01 M3, 88 Land Cruiser
hjdca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 12:58 PM   #18
Macaro
 
Macaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Camaro ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lakeville, CT
Posts: 339
Thank you guys so much for taking and posting the interview! Great to hear some of these things straight from Al's mouth. Can't wait for my ZL1 1LE order to become official.
Macaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 01:00 PM   #19
kingbambino22
 
kingbambino22's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023Porsche Cayenne S
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: everywhere and no where
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by hjdca View Post
Note: The ride also has a lot to do with the track tires. When I took off the Trefeos and put on the MPS4S on my Z/28, the ride got way more compliant and the tram lining completely stopped... Now it just feels like a lowered pony car with a great lowered suspension that corners unreal anytime you want.. No worries on driving it every day.. It was definitely harder to drive it every day with the Trefeos.
Same way I felt when I was DD the Z/28 I had. I missed the stiffer ride lol. I'm all for stiff cause I don't by performance cars for luxury items. That's just me though. Ill be glad to have a car I don't have to change any parts to aftermarket ones. Drive to the store like normal, to track if I feel like tracking, road trips and all. I'm more concern with the tires lasting a little longer than the Z/28 that's all. Oh, and the price,
kingbambino22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 02:59 PM   #20
Sven59
HAMMER PILOT
 
Sven59's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 ZL1#182, 85 CJ7, 16 Silverado
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 4,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedyman View Post
Sure, interesting to see how Zl1s, GT350s, or whatever else stacks up against the traditional elite of the performance world.

My point is quite simple. It is highly unlikely that significant numbers of buyers if any will opt for a Euro exotic costing 2-4 times as much as a ZL1 based on a "ring time". That is just really not going to happen in numbers and that makes the "ring time" more a matter of performance trivia rather than a basis for purchase as some drumbeaters would have us believe. The C7 Z06 has never posted a "ring time" and they have sold by the tens of thousands with a devout following.
Did you know a Boeing 707 can do a barrel roll? Does it matter selling it to airlines? Not much, but it got their attention.
__________________
"DO YOU WANT ME TO PUT THE HAMMER DOWN?"
Sven59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 09:56 PM   #21
mkorgan

 
Drives: 1970-1/2 Z-28, 2017 ZL1
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Sanford, Fl
Posts: 973
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven59 View Post
Did you know a Boeing 707 can do a barrel roll? Does it matter selling it to airlines? Not much, but it got their attention.
It sure as hell would get mine, especially if I was in the plane when they decided to prove it 😳
mkorgan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2017, 07:30 AM   #22
VAZL1

 
VAZL1's Avatar
 
Drives: 17 ZL1
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: VA
Posts: 1,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkorgan View Post
It sure as hell would get mine, especially if I was in the plane when they decided to prove it 😳
__________________
2017 ZL1 Coupe M6, Red Hot
Mods; AFE Pro 5R CAI, Kong Ported Blower and Snout, NW 103 TB, Griptech 2.31 Upper, Kooks 2",JMS Voltage Booster, Flex Fuel, Mighty Mouse CC,Jannetty Racing Tune, 680 rwhp
VAZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2017, 09:38 AM   #23
speedyman
Account Suspended
 
Drives: ATS4
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: SW PA
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven59 View Post
Did you know a Boeing 707 can do a barrel roll? Does it matter selling it to airlines? Not much, but it got their attention.
Thank You! I couldn't have made my point in a better fashion. Would any airline have NOT purchased a 707 if it couldn't "barrel roll"? You just don't get it. "Ring times" are totally irrelevant to the overwhelming majority of those who are considering a sports/performance car purchase. These times matter to a very, very, tiny group of individuals.
speedyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2017, 09:51 AM   #24
Rusty35
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 474
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedyman View Post
Thank You! I couldn't have made my point in a better fashion. Would any airline have NOT purchased a 707 if it couldn't "barrel roll"? You just don't get it. "Ring times" are totally irrelevant to the overwhelming majority of those who are considering a sports/performance car purchase. These times matter to a very, very, tiny group of individuals.

A very very tiny group of people are buying ZL1's
Rusty35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2017, 09:58 AM   #25
90503


 
90503's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Torrance
Posts: 14,442
If someone doesn't care about track times, that's fine....They don't need to know about something they don't want to spend the time to understand, even after it's been explained to them....

But someone who does take an interest in the 'Ring times, is even more disinterested in listening to someone who doesn't care about them....
90503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2017, 11:25 AM   #26
speedyman
Account Suspended
 
Drives: ATS4
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: SW PA
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90503 View Post
If someone doesn't care about track times, that's fine....They don't need to know about something they don't want to spend the time to understand, even after it's been explained to them....

But someone who does take an interest in the 'Ring times, is even more disinterested in listening to someone who doesn't care about them....
I find Ring times interesting to some degree but sharply disagree with anyone who feels that large numbers of performance enthusiasts base their purchases on what car X, Y, or Z does at the Ring. That is my point. There are some who see these Ring times as a to be all, end all, metric and that they are clearly NOT.
speedyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2017, 11:53 AM   #27
Rusty35
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 474
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedyman View Post
I find Ring times interesting to some degree but sharply disagree with anyone who feels that large numbers of performance enthusiasts base their purchases on what car X, Y, or Z does at the Ring. That is my point. There are some who see these Ring times as a to be all, end all, metric and that they are clearly NOT.
Who are the ones that see the Ring time as a to be all end all metric?

There are plenty of people who buy cars simply of the advertised numbers.
Rusty35 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2017, 12:16 PM   #28
speedyman
Account Suspended
 
Drives: ATS4
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: SW PA
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusty35 View Post
Who are the ones that see the Ring time as a to be all end all metric?

There are plenty of people who buy cars simply of the advertised numbers.
I agree with that in regard to 0-60 and 1/4 mile. I get a near gut busting laugh at the guys who think that they are going to feel a difference in their world with a vehicle that is plus or minus ten seconds on the "Ring". Who here is going to feel a 1 or 2 per cent difference in "Ring" time? NO ONE! This is a classic example of how some statistics can be grossly overstated.
speedyman is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.