Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-15-2018, 10:04 AM   #1
RealQuick
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6 - Intake/Exhaust
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bridgewater
Posts: 693
Next steps... new project

After pulling my SBE LS3 to put in my GTO, and I just sold the Huron Single Kit, I am starting a new project for the Camaro.

here is the plan...

Engine:
TSP LS3 427ci (Weisco slugs, TSP crank, Callies rods, ARP 2000 and Mainstuds)
10:1 SCR
AI280CC LS3 heads/BTR.660 Ti
235/231 .6XX/.6XX 115LSA (may change this, but worked really well on the single setup).
OE Lifters
LS3 rockers with Straub Trunnion upgrade
Melling Oil pump (hi volume)

Fuel: 93 octane
1000CC injectors
ZL1 Pump
ADM FPCM
Alky Control Dual Nozzle Kit (15+5) - May go up on the 2nd nozzle.

I made 817rwhp on 376ci at 60% DC when running meth, so there is a little more room, but it wont get me to 1000rwhp. I know I will need to change out the pump at some point, but for now I am gonna run it and just make whatever power I can while supplementing with meth.

Power Added:
Twin Turbo Low mount
Huron or AGP (undecided)
Probably something in the ballpark of 60/62 turbos

Ignition:
Granatelli coils (already have them)
br8's
Wires TBD

Tranny:
Stock M6 tranny
Street Slayer Billet Twin
New Slave
Tick speed bleeder

Rear:
Stock for now
3.45 gears

DSS aluminum 1 piece driveshaft

Tires:
20x11
Nitto 305/35-20 NT05R
Didnt hook worth a shit with the single kit on low power, so I will be upgrading to something with a little more sidewall. I just dont want to have to ditch the rear stock brakes... so I think 17" wheel is the smallest I can go.

Obviously there are lots of things I should upgrade and build for strength (fuel system, tranny and rear), and as money comes I will do that. For now I need a new motor and turbo setup, so that is the focus first.

Last edited by RealQuick; 02-15-2018 at 11:14 AM.
RealQuick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 10:43 AM   #2
dreksnot
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
 
dreksnot's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 Camaro LSX434 TT M6, 21 ZLE A10
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,605
The setup looks good. Ya, the NT05R's didn't work out well for me. The M/T R's have been awesome.
__________________

In excess of 1,000WHP
LSX434 | AGP 65/65 TT | BTR Equalizer Intake | Trickflow 245cc cathedral | BTR custom cam | Cortex EBC | n2mb WOT | ID-1700x | Brisk GR12S | RPM Lv 7 TR6060 | AGP's Triple 525LPH Fore Fuel | Monster LT1-S Triple | 4.11 DSS Proform 9", CF driveshaft, 1400hp axles | Hurst Line Lock | MGW Retro Short Throw w/old skool Hurst T-handle | ADM solid subframe mounts | Prothane Motor Mounts | Revshift Poly Trans insert | Moreno camber/caster plates
dreksnot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 11:13 AM   #3
RealQuick
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6 - Intake/Exhaust
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bridgewater
Posts: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreksnot View Post
The setup looks good. Ya, the NT05R's didn't work out well for me. The M/T R's have been awesome.
What size M/T R’s?
RealQuick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 01:14 PM   #4
AGP Turbo

 
Drives: All things Turbocharged
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,199
29" M/T ET Street R on an 18" rim fits and works pretty good all around. Same tire on a 15" is insane strait line traction but a wobbly, bouncy, shit handling bitch. At 200mph, they will help you find Jesus.
AGP Turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 01:16 PM   #5
AGP Turbo

 
Drives: All things Turbocharged
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,199
Is that engine a 4.1" stroke?
AGP Turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 01:36 PM   #6
BiggFoot

 
BiggFoot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro (M6) 1000+ HP SBE
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGP Turbo View Post
29" M/T ET Street R on an 18" rim fits and works pretty good all around. Same tire on a 15" is insane strait line traction but a wobbly, bouncy, shit handling bitch. At 200mph, they will help you find Jesus.
LOL
__________________
F-1X, Cog Drive, ATI Super Pulley/Sprag ~ 19 psi
Blower Cam
Brodix BP BR 3 Heads
Kooks LT Headers and full 3" exhaust
Fore Triple Pump Fuel System with ID 1700X Injectors - E85 conversion

DSS 9” Conversion (1400 hp axles, driveshaft, pumpkin) & Strange 3.70 gears
McLeod RXT Twin HD Clutch & Upgraded Slave
RPM Level VII
TR6060
BMR Drag Suspension Package w/Strange shocks
Carlyle 15" and M/T ET Street R radials
10.1 @ 143 mph 1/4 mile


BiggFoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 02:26 PM   #7
bct10985

 
Drives: 2010 2SS LS3, 2013 duramax
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Dover, De
Posts: 1,451
Might want to reconsider the 427 ls3 with boost. Probably look into a fuel system and bigger injectors also.
__________________
ECS Ysi-B, cam, Tsp 2" longtubes, Squash dual pumps, Id1300s, meth, 4L80e, FTI 3600, ZL1 3.73 diff, BMR suspension, 15" conversion, weld rts mt 275 et street R. 9.6@147mph
bct10985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 02:37 PM   #8
Punisher_ATX
 
Drives: 2010 SS
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin
Posts: 439
Boosted 427 is a bad idea. Id rather keep a stock crank and put in TSP I beam rods and a CP carillo piston. Better bang for buck combo imho.
Punisher_ATX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 02:58 PM   #9
RealQuick
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6 - Intake/Exhaust
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bridgewater
Posts: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGP Turbo View Post
Is that engine a 4.1" stroke?
Yes.
RealQuick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 03:00 PM   #10
RealQuick
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6 - Intake/Exhaust
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Bridgewater
Posts: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punisher_ATX View Post
Boosted 427 is a bad idea. Id rather keep a stock crank and put in TSP I beam rods and a CP carillo piston. Better bang for buck combo imho.

Why is it “a bad idea”. Care to elaborate?
RealQuick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 03:04 PM   #11
TRC-SS
700RWHP-650TQ
 
TRC-SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Forged LS3 Supercharged/Cammed
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Shrewsbury Massachusetts
Posts: 5,269
I don't know why but I've never heard anything good about boosting an LS7.

Most takes the LS3 and bore it out to a 416 stroker and forge away a monster
__________________
View Build HERE>>>>>MY 2011 2SS/RS JOURNAL
TRC-SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 03:05 PM   #12
Punisher_ATX
 
Drives: 2010 SS
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin
Posts: 439
With the longer stroke you are getting more extreme rod angles and as a result you are going to be putting extra stress on the bottom halves of the already short sleeves. Over time the sleeves will begin to oval in shape and eventually you will have a failure. Will this happen in 5k miles or 100k miles. dont know but it will wear out a motor MUCH faster. Id NEVER go more than a 4" stroke on a stock block LS motor. I prefer the stock 3.622 stroke.
Punisher_ATX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 03:08 PM   #13
Punisher_ATX
 
Drives: 2010 SS
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin
Posts: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRC-SS View Post
I don't know why but I've never heard anything good about boosting an LS7.

Most takes the LS3 and bore it out to a 416 stroker and forge away a monster
Reason boosted ls7's are bad for boost is the cylinder walls in an ls7 are thinner than the walls in a cheap hotel room. 7psi is about the limit lol
Punisher_ATX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 03:09 PM   #14
blake-b


 
blake-b's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 ZR1
Join Date: May 2010
Location: KCMO
Posts: 3,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealQuick View Post
Why is it “a bad idea”. Care to elaborate?
Crank stroke vs. cylinder sleeve length.

The 4.1 stroke pulls the piston farther down the sleeve. Has it been done before? Yes. Does it always blow up the engine? No. Will the earth tilt off it's axis and hurtle into space, killing everyone? No, but it might destroy your bank account if you have to rebuild again. If you were NA, I'd say yes as there are a few builds on here that have successfully done it.

I'd go with a 4" crank and have a 416-418. The 9-11 cubic inches you lose will never be missed and you'll have a better setup for big HP.

I can't find it but I've seen a chart that shows the different block (OEM and aftermarket) sleeve lengths.

If you got creative with a 6.098 rod and piston pin placement, you might be better off. Still, I'd go 4" crank and not worry at all.
blake-b is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.