03-30-2023, 06:15 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2023 Sharkskin 2SS Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: NWFL
Posts: 758
|
UPF64R or stick with the PF64 Oil Filter.
??
|
03-30-2023, 06:26 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2023 ZL1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Az
Posts: 624
|
A step up from the PF 64 , I would like to think.
__________________
2023 ZL1 A10 Shadow Gray Metallic
|
03-30-2023, 06:28 PM | #3 |
Drives: 2023 Sharkskin 2SS Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: NWFL
Posts: 758
|
|
03-30-2023, 06:30 PM | #4 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Convertible Join Date: May 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,711
|
PF64. The PF64 has a 22 psi bypass pressure. The UPF64R filter has a 35 psi bypass pressure. There are numerous discussions in the forums comparing these filters if you want to search for them.
|
03-31-2023, 05:42 AM | #5 |
Long live the ICE...
Drives: 2020 Camaro ZL1 Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Berks County, PA
Posts: 30
|
Search resulted in no help. Why is the higher bypass pressure a problem?
__________________
2020 ZL1 in Satin Steel Metallic.
|
03-31-2023, 07:13 AM | #6 |
Drives: 23 ZL1 A10 Rapid Blue Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: MO
Posts: 1,992
|
If they wanted you to use a UPF64R that's what would be in the manual.
|
03-31-2023, 08:21 AM | #7 |
Thank you Al Oppenheiser!
Drives: Red Hot A10 ZL1 Convertible Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 4,975
|
PF64.
There's no way I'd mess with a different bypass psi. The oiling system is fragile enough as it is. Enjoy your denied warranty claim. |
03-31-2023, 04:58 PM | #8 |
Banned
Drives: i want a camaro Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: miami, the hottest place on earth
Posts: 407
|
im debating if i should get a handful, for future oil changes, and it looks like the UP64R is a little taller, by a few milimeters, and its ideal for the V8s and the supercharged V8, either way, its all good
|
03-31-2023, 05:31 PM | #9 |
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 Coupe Join Date: May 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,813
|
The gold GM filter is for the LS engines and I would stay with the regular GM filter for the LT engines. Or you could go with the Gold Napa or the Mobil 1 filters. I have had no problems with either of those in my LT4 engine.
__________________
ZL1 Coupe, PDR, Exposed carbon fiber hood insert, My Link with Nav, M6 6 speed and Silver Ice Metallic. Mods done: ceramic window tint, GM Accessories Camaro floor mats and Roto-Fab CAI.
|
03-31-2023, 05:46 PM | #10 |
Drives: 2020 Callaway Camaro SC630 Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 320
|
If I were you, I would get at least a dozen.
__________________
2020 Callaway Camaro SC630 - MN6 1SS Satin Steel Gray
2019 Callaway Corvette SC757 - MN7 1LZ Elkhart Lake Blue |
03-31-2023, 09:40 PM | #11 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 11,614
|
I don't understand why you guys want to use UPF64R all of a sudden, when every piece of documentation calls for PF64. The price difference is negligible, especially considering the price of oil and the typical frequency of oil changes even among the most paranoid.
This isn't the same as the oil debate where there are objective standards and oils can exceed those with or without certification. The UPF64R has a different bypass psi, ergo behavior, and I have yet to see actual test results that would prove its (assumed) superiority to the PF64 (that itself has had a quite a few revisions over the years). With all that said, I would be happy to read some educational materials on these specific filter beyond the handwavy marketing fluff that many threads in the past linked to. As a single data point, I have used PF64 since the day I took delivery and never had an issue.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune 1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18 3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18 3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18 4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18 4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18 5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18 |
04-01-2023, 07:26 AM | #12 | |
Drives: 2017 2SS, 50th pkg, M6, MRC, NPP Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ocean City, NJ
Posts: 3,181
|
Quote:
My car runs about 40 psi with 5w-30 once warmed up and under light load/cruise. This is with the PF64, and this covers probably 95% of my driving. The UPF probably has different media plus the higher bypass setting. 35 is a little close to 40 for my comfort. The filter is going to bypass when either the oil is too thick to get through the media, or the media is too clogged. Now that 35 number may mean it STARTS to bypass at 35 and is FULLY OPEN at a higher pressure. I'm not sure, but flow volume would be important there. Someone else can run the experiment and let us know. A valve like this will have a "cracking pressure" and a "fully open pressure." |
|
04-01-2023, 10:41 AM | #13 | |
Drives: '16 2SS M6 Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Hughes Springs, TX
Posts: 320
|
Quote:
__________________
David
'16 2SS M6 black on black, SW long tube full exhaust, NPP, Roto-fab CAI, ported stock TB '16 2SS M6 black w/Metallic black stripes, Kalahari, 6 piston front (totaled 1/22/20) '14 Fusion Titanium 2.0T '83 Jeep Wagoneer |
|
04-01-2023, 11:40 AM | #14 | |
Drives: 2016 2SS Convertible Join Date: May 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,711
|
A post from a different thread on oil filters. I’m not an expert but this seems to imply that a higher bypass pressure could result in oil starvation.
https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=566061 Quote:
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|