Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-26-2019, 03:42 PM   #29
Rons1le
 
Rons1le's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 2SS RS 1LE AGM
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Galion, Oh
Posts: 531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris49066SS View Post
Hi Ron, do you run pump gas on those injectors? Do you know what your duty cycle is?
No sorry, I totaled that car Sept 2018 and do not remember what duty cycle the injectors were at for that. And yes that was 93 octane.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
__________________
2015 2SS RS 1LE NPP/w Kooks headers, Procharged, ID1050X injectors, Katech belt tensioner, Mighty Mouse Catch Can, BMR subframe connectors, Matco driveshaft loop, AEM Wideband/Boost/Fuel gauges , Z/28 Splitter and Spoiler/w Wicker bill, Power Stop rotors and brake pads, MRR Z/28 Rep Wheels 20" w/p zeros 285 fronts and 305 rears, ZL1 addons Rock guards and Tow hook, Rear window louvers, Flags on the quarter windows and the moonroof, Billet aluminum door handles.
Rons1le is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2019, 04:46 PM   #30
weSS1LEy
weSS1LEy
 
weSS1LEy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 camaro 2ss/rs/1le
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 510
It sounds like what is needed for 500whp Na will interfere with sc later. Btw does anyone else feel night fury intake duration is pushing it a bit?
__________________
Rotofab, arh no cats, atak, elite cc, 94 octane tune, Mobil 1, phastek scoop, custom cam 230/243 .621 .604 114+4, related cam kit stuff. 470/435 rwhp/rwtq
weSS1LEy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2019, 09:44 PM   #31
Teeth
 
Teeth's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Columbia, South Carolina
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris49066SS View Post
I have the LOD intake. You should see about getting a 5k stall converter. One of the members in here has one. I have a 4k converter, and the LOD intake wants more converter and more cam (on an all motor setup with 6L80) than even the SS4 and Circle D 5C. The converter is why Ben at GPI didnt set my shift points even higher, because I make peak HP at 7600 but continue to carry it out to 7800 RPM until the stock heads can't keep up. Go big on the converter. And mine shifts at 7600, 7400, and 7400 in the 1/4

The intake doesn't start to work its magic until after 7000 RPM. Just make sure you do the supporting valvetrain mods like a trunnion upgrade and have a good tuner...

And this photo will show you what the powerband is wanting to do. Now, I know you are going for boost, which, so am I, in a centrifugal supercharger build, so know that the LOD will support that very well. It just rules out a PD blower.
Yeah, the LOD is a good look, but it kinda forces me to procharge or turbocharge the car...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rons1le View Post
Manual 6sp with Kooks 1-7/8" to 3" with x pipe. Night fury cam installed, no intake work done. I was told night fury cam works great with boost also. First run was basline just exhaust and cai.
Wish I had a manual, lol


Quote:
Originally Posted by weSS1LEy View Post
It sounds like what is needed for 500whp Na will interfere with sc later. Btw does anyone else feel night fury intake duration is pushing it a bit?
I was thinking that the nightfury and the LOD intake would work well with the boost, and those are the most central things to the build at the moment, besides the Vararam ram air. (what does "sc" mean?)

Also what would the intake duration have an impact on?
Teeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2019, 09:54 PM   #32
Greenhornet2

 
Greenhornet2's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS LS3 Whipple
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,925
Intake duration affects valve overlap, something you don't want too much of on a PD supercharger setup, you just blow the boost out the exhaust.
__________________
Whipple 2.9 CAI ID1050x injectors ZL1 Pump JRE FPCM JMS Voltage booster JRE Rough Idle blower cam BTR .660 springs CHE trunnion kit 1 7/8 Speed Engineering Borla Atak JRE scoop 1.5" lowering springs BMR trailing arms and toe links Cradle inserts 704WHP 603WTQ 93 octane
Greenhornet2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2019, 09:56 PM   #33
Teeth
 
Teeth's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Columbia, South Carolina
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenhornet2 View Post
Intake duration affects valve overlap, something you don't want too much of on a PD supercharger setup, you just blow the boost out the exhaust.
Oh, well then I guess I'll have to turbocharge the car.

That's the end of that one.
Teeth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2019, 11:04 PM   #34
pnwdan

 
pnwdan's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Washington
Posts: 848
With the amount of money it takes to get the L99 to this point, you might be better off just throwing boost on it.
__________________
2014 2SS/RS LS3/M6
pnwdan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2019, 04:51 AM   #35
havelegs

 
havelegs's Avatar
 
Drives: '23 LT1 A10
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teeth View Post
Looks like I came to the same conclusion you did. I'm gonna settle for whatever number I get from the dyno off of the cam, headers, converter and intake.



I'm thinking LOD X1 intake, Nightfury cam and that Circle D converter (just dont know what option to get for my car...)













Kinda wanna wait on my decision to boost it, since there is now a certain look I want to go for with the engine bay, I'm even considering to twin-turbo the thing for that reason.
From what I understand the LOD isn't great for daily and works best in high rpm.
__________________
24 LT1 M6 Sharkskin Metallic
havelegs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2019, 05:49 AM   #36
Clarkstar

 
Clarkstar's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1SS 1LE
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Ixonia wi
Posts: 1,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by havelegs View Post
From what I understand the LOD isn't great for daily and works best in high rpm.
It works just fine for daily. The power band is in the higher rpm range then the factory piece. If your goal is 500hp you'll need a mid rise or high rise intake.... like the LOD.
__________________
2013 1le- Katech 416 short block, TSP custom grind cam, LOD intake, cnc heads by F.ED., Nick William's 102mm T.B., CORN fed, Pedders coilovers. Performance street alingnment by Justin at Lake Country Alignment and dyno tune by Late Model Throttle.

603 h.p. 495 ft lbs tq.

Last edited by Clarkstar; 12-27-2019 at 08:41 AM.
Clarkstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2019, 06:40 AM   #37
pyroguy
Started#gottalovethatblue
 
pyroguy's Avatar
 
Drives: ABM #831
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: TN
Posts: 6,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teeth View Post
Oh, well then I guess I'll have to turbocharge the car.

That's the end of that one.
The same principles apply for turbos. If your intake and exhaust valves are open at the same time you will not be able to build boost in your cylinders which will rob you of power. That's the same for all boosted applications whether positive displacement supercharger, centrifugal supercharger, or turbo(s).
__________________
'10 Camaro 2SS/RS | Aqua Blue #831 of 3,903 | Silver Stripes
Check out my build thread
pyroguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2019, 07:32 AM   #38
Greenhornet2

 
Greenhornet2's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS LS3 Whipple
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,925
Turbo requires even less duration than a sc to be effective. It's not that it won't work. Any cam will work it's just you won't get as much boost out of it, fou have to spin the turbo, sc whatever faster to get the same boost level if the cam is too big. So, to me, building badass fast NA car doesn't always play well if you plan to boost it later. No matter what if you stick boost on something you are still going to gain power it just may not be as much power as if you were building for boost to begin with. Lots of guys swear by running stock cam profiles with turbo cars especially since at lower rpm you are not building much boost so when there's a bunch of overlap that boost is even harder to achieve. I've done a lot of research and read a lot of different things. I'm not an expert, i'm just going by what i took from my research so take my advice with a grain of salt. I've always stuck with the general rule of thumb, on boosted applications i want 10 degrees less intake duration than exhaust and .20 less intake lift than exhaust. If you are going big on a can lobe separation of more than 114. But there's a lot in play. If you have a smaller profile cam on a turbo you can run a tighter lsa. There's so much research and so much in play it's not an easy answer. I'd suggest if you really are planning on boosting it to just buy a cam profiled for what you want to boost it with right away. I ended up buying jannettys rough idle sc cam. He recently posted a dyno run with his smooth idle sc cam on a turbo car and it made like 760whp i think.
__________________
Whipple 2.9 CAI ID1050x injectors ZL1 Pump JRE FPCM JMS Voltage booster JRE Rough Idle blower cam BTR .660 springs CHE trunnion kit 1 7/8 Speed Engineering Borla Atak JRE scoop 1.5" lowering springs BMR trailing arms and toe links Cradle inserts 704WHP 603WTQ 93 octane
Greenhornet2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2019, 02:04 PM   #39
havelegs

 
havelegs's Avatar
 
Drives: '23 LT1 A10
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarkstar View Post
It works just fine for daily. The power band is in the higher rpm range then the factory piece. If your goal is 500hp you'll need a mid rise or high rise intake.... like the LOD.
No lack of torque in the lower rpm range?
__________________
24 LT1 M6 Sharkskin Metallic
havelegs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2019, 02:06 PM   #40
pnwdan

 
pnwdan's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Washington
Posts: 848
Quote:
Originally Posted by havelegs View Post
No lack of torque in the lower rpm range?
Remember with a bigger cam and higher stall converter, you'll be in the lower rpm range less anyway
__________________
2014 2SS/RS LS3/M6
pnwdan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2019, 02:07 PM   #41
Clarkstar

 
Clarkstar's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 1SS 1LE
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Ixonia wi
Posts: 1,456
My dyno numbers showed a loss of torque... buy I can't really feel it. Pulls like a raped ape!
__________________
2013 1le- Katech 416 short block, TSP custom grind cam, LOD intake, cnc heads by F.ED., Nick William's 102mm T.B., CORN fed, Pedders coilovers. Performance street alingnment by Justin at Lake Country Alignment and dyno tune by Late Model Throttle.

603 h.p. 495 ft lbs tq.
Clarkstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2019, 02:19 PM   #42
Chris49066SS

 
Chris49066SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS L99
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarkstar View Post
My dyno numbers showed a loss of torque... buy I can't really feel it. Pulls like a raped ape!
+1.
__________________
Previous PB:11.079 @ 122.99mph.. New setup time: TBD
The 11.079 pass: https://youtu.be/pz27Zq54t_E
Build thread - www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=555371
Chris49066SS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.