Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Technical Camaro Topics > Dragstrip and Launching Discussion


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-01-2017, 01:06 PM   #1
cmitchell17

 
Drives: 17 2SS, 8L90, Cam, Heads, E85
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 1,201
Who has tried adjusting camber for straight line traction?

Is there any advantage to adjusting camber for better launch traction? I think the factory settings are pretty aggressive and you can definitely tell but how much more the insides of the rear tires wear compared to the outsides. I would imagine this is for maximum grip in cornering?
cmitchell17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2017, 01:13 PM   #2
parish8

 
Drives: 17 SS a8
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
A friend of mine put 325/50/15’s in the back and adjusted the camber to 0. Car drives fine but he isn’t hitting it hard enough yet to notice a difference in traction.

I think it is worth doing if you are not concerned with cornering.
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472
parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2017, 02:47 PM   #3
cmitchell17

 
Drives: 17 2SS, 8L90, Cam, Heads, E85
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 1,201
How much does bump steer affect the camber? So if you get a lot of weight transfer I would imagine the camber would be even worse, unless the rear suspension isn't effected?
cmitchell17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2017, 02:56 PM   #4
parish8

 
Drives: 17 SS a8
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
We wondered that too but decided to just zero it out while at rest. I am anxious to see how the tires wear.
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472
parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2017, 09:42 PM   #5
cmitchell17

 
Drives: 17 2SS, 8L90, Cam, Heads, E85
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 1,201
It dosent seem like we have much options to improve launch and straight line traction. The car as it is seems like it does a really good job at keeping the tires planted without wheelhop. Its suprising you can break the tires loose and not even know it its so smooth and you can't even hear them spinning. That to me is telling me that the suspension is planted and very stable. What ive found works is that the biggest variable is the road surface, on recently paved roads that have just been sealed its fine, but on worn roads its impossible to get anything to hook.
cmitchell17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 12:44 PM   #6
cmitchell17

 
Drives: 17 2SS, 8L90, Cam, Heads, E85
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 1,201
So apparently my rear camber is maxxed out. They said they couldn't bring in anymore positive camber which obviously they are doing something wrong if the factory setting is at -.9 degrees and it's maxxed out at -1:

Name:  20171216_131143.jpg
Views: 317
Size:  133.5 KB

I did get a half a degree on the left and .3 degrees on the right. So far I haven't noticed any benefit for straight line traction, but I want to keep going to at least around -.3 or -.4.

From looking at my stock Goodyear's and the wear on them it looks like I've got a lot more negative camber than what's showing. Both inside rear tires are showing chords, I did get 30k out of them since they are just at the wear bars on the opposite side of the tire.Name:  20171214_195557.jpg
Views: 313
Size:  191.3 KB
cmitchell17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2017, 09:37 AM   #7
PRAY


 
PRAY's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
I know that on all the other IRS cars that rip at the track the camber is 0 in the squatted position. You have to get the biggest foot print on the ground possible. Talking to Steven at 42 Autosports it can get dicey on the big end when the suspension unloads. I am guessing you will need a fully adjustable rear to get everything out of it that you can. When I swap over to all of my suspension stuff I am going to take it to him to be set up.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
PRAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2017, 10:06 PM   #8
cmitchell17

 
Drives: 17 2SS, 8L90, Cam, Heads, E85
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 1,201
Do you have any idea how much negative camber comes from the suspension squatting?
cmitchell17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2017, 10:13 PM   #9
cmitchell17

 
Drives: 17 2SS, 8L90, Cam, Heads, E85
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 1,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRAY View Post
I know that on all the other IRS cars that rip at the track the camber is 0 in the squatted position. You have to get the biggest foot print on the ground possible. Talking to Steven at 42 Autosports it can get dicey on the big end when the suspension unloads. I am guessing you will need a fully adjustable rear to get everything out of it that you can. When I swap over to all of my suspension stuff I am going to take it to him to be set up.
So I would probably need adjustable control arms and trailing arms for proper zero camber? Maybe the adjusting bolts needs replacing since they are torque to yield, maybe that's why there's no more room to tighten them?
cmitchell17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2017, 04:22 AM   #10
PRAY


 
PRAY's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmitchell17 View Post
So I would probably need adjustable control arms and trailing arms for proper zero camber? Maybe the adjusting bolts needs replacing since they are torque to yield, maybe that's why there's no more room to tighten them?
I am sorry brother, I don't have to answer to either of your questions. I know that my car squats about an inch to and inch and a half on the launch according to the pics. I haven't adjusted mine yet so I don't have a solid answer for you.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
PRAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2017, 05:32 AM   #11
Bluecyclone
 
Bluecyclone's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Cyclone mustang
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Port Lavaca,Tx.
Posts: 355
Launch grip

My GT is set @ 1.5 neg for the twisty's but I did a burnout grip test recently and you can see the inside of the tires are doing most of the work so 1.1-1.3 may help. I have "Lifetime alignment" with Firestone so I can track & experiment R&D for grip on launch. Just started testing.
Attached Images
 
__________________
2014 Cyclone/Select Shift/"/Sold
2016 ruby red GT w/3.55:1/resonator delete X- pipe/UPR catch can/Airaid "tube"W/AEM/J&M/BigWorm/BMR /SVE /ZL1addons/Redline/Steeda/BG fluids/
Bluecyclone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2017, 09:16 AM   #12
cmitchell17

 
Drives: 17 2SS, 8L90, Cam, Heads, E85
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 1,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluecyclone View Post
My GT is set @ 1.5 neg for the twisty's but I did a burnout grip test recently and you can see the inside of the tires are doing most of the work so 1.1-1.3 may help. I have "Lifetime alignment" with Firestone so I can track & experiment R&D for grip on launch. Just started testing.
Never thought of doing a burnout test, that's a good idea. Getting a lifetime alignment is probably a good idea too, I just can't figure out why It can't be adjusted anymore.

Does anyone have a good diagram of the camber adjustment?
cmitchell17 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.