04-06-2016, 02:30 PM | #15 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Posts: 779
|
Quote:
|
|
04-06-2016, 02:38 PM | #16 | |
Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
http://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/...-for-test.html |
|
04-06-2016, 02:49 PM | #17 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Posts: 779
|
Quote:
|
|
04-06-2016, 02:56 PM | #18 | |
Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
There are a lot of people who are very certain the LT1 will lose power. We will find out in time what really is going on. |
|
04-06-2016, 03:00 PM | #19 |
Drives: 2014 2LS (traded in) 2015 1SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 2,132
|
How dare you! The 4L60E was awesome! Had 3 of them! True they were all in the same truck but they were great. And the 2 I had in the truck after that were bullet proof too.
|
04-06-2016, 03:02 PM | #20 |
|
The LT1 is a great engine.
Last night I saw a LT1 Stingray running 10.0s @ 142 on a stock block with just a centrifugal, DRs, injectors, a tune, and LTs on pump gas. Why would we want to swap this engine out?
__________________
"Democracy Dies in Darkness" |
04-06-2016, 03:40 PM | #21 | |
マスタング = 遅い
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 7,061
|
Quote:
Also, remember the LT1 in the Camaro has a factory "catch can" that the Corvette doesn't have (at least not yet), and I was reading about some new kind of injectors coming for '17. |
|
04-06-2016, 03:41 PM | #22 | |
Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
But the main reason to get rid of the LT1 is direct injection. Direct injection is the worse thing to come out of the industry in the past 10 years. cars are needing manual cleaning at 40k miles. Even when you put a catch can system on, carbon will happen over time. just not as fast. the LS motors are built to last, and pull 10s. |
|
04-06-2016, 03:49 PM | #23 |
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,860
|
Tsloper we agree on something, this is a turning point in our relationship. Ha
__________________
2022 Lt1 6.2 A10, Maggie 2300, THPSI Port Inj/10 rib, Rotofab, E, Nickey, SCOL, Griptech, RC Bandits, Hoosiers/MT 9.80@142.96 1.44 60ft, 6.34@112 707/669 RWHP/TRQ. 16SS Maggie 2650 9.41@147 1.35 60ft, 5.99@119. 16 C7 A8 10.90@128 Bolt on stuff
|
04-06-2016, 06:19 PM | #24 | |
Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
Same reason why you see people installing catch cans on camaros. Amazes me how many people think the factory system on the camaro is a catch can. |
|
04-06-2016, 06:28 PM | #25 | |
Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT, Shelby GT500 Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,376
|
Quote:
|
|
04-06-2016, 07:33 PM | #26 |
Drives: 2013 Ford Fusion SE Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 21
|
Interesting comments... I think out of the 3, VVT is nice to have. I'm also am a fan of direct injection.. Given the headache
Was not aware of the head issues of the LS7.... I thought it had a Titanium valvetrain.. Can someone shed some light??? |
04-06-2016, 07:37 PM | #27 | |
Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
Funny how people went through the same thing. |
|
04-06-2016, 07:42 PM | #28 | |
Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
Quote:
GM made a statement about it, and fixed it in 2011 i believe. I would have no problem buying a LS7 crate motor today, but if you are still worried buy a LS3 instead. The LS3 is rock solid. |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|