05-16-2022, 10:27 AM | #1 |
Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 164
|
ZL1 Power Loss At Altitude
Hey guys, been trying to do some research. Haven't really found a definitive answer or calculator...
I just moved to colorado (6700 feet) and I was wondering how I could calculate the power loss. I've read that N/A loses the most power...then superchargers...and turbos are virtually unaffected. Just wondering if you guys can help me properly guestimate how much power I'm losing up here. |
05-16-2022, 10:31 AM | #2 |
Drives: 2019 Chevy Camaro ZL1 M6 Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Sea level
Posts: 1,252
|
I think superchargers lose the most power. It’s because we make 2-3 pounds of boost less due to the altitude. I’m near SE Aurora. I’ve seen a black 5th Gen ZL1 a couple times in the last few days. Is that you?
__________________
Kong Stage X Port, NW103, LPE HPFP, XDI +30 Injectors, ARH Headers, Flex Fuel, JMS Booster, AWE Touring, Elite E2-X CC. Stock heads, stock cam, stock pulleys: Tuned by KingLT1. 740whp Uncorrected on e50
|
05-16-2022, 10:33 AM | #3 |
Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 164
|
Yeah, I understand losing boost. That's what another random forum online said. But I would think that the power loss wouldn't be as bad as N/A because we're still FI right?
|
05-16-2022, 10:37 AM | #4 |
Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 164
|
|
05-16-2022, 11:38 AM | #5 | |
Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,534
|
Quote:
Easy fix is to change a pulley to make up for the loss in ambient pressure and your boost will be back, but then you’ll be adding heat by spinning it quicker. Move back to sea level
__________________
928rwhp - 93 | 1040rwhp/898rwrq - E65 SAE
LME 377 LT4 Short Block | Magnuson 2650 80mm upper w/13% lower (9.06) | DSX Lid & Valve Covers | CSP Custom Cam w/32% fuel lobe | CID Heads | NW 103mm TB | Roto Fab Big Gulp | CSP 2" Headers w/Green GESI Gen 2 Cats | Borla 3" Full Cat Back w/ S-Type| Mighty Mouse Wild Catch Can| Custom Holley Low side Fuel system| TooHigh PSI Port Injection w/Holley Controller | Forced Inductions Interchiller w/2 gallon fender tank | TK Performance built 10L90 |
|
05-16-2022, 11:39 AM | #6 | |
Drives: '20 ZLE Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,558
|
The dyno shops and racers here pretty much agree on at least 20% power loss at 8000 DA. In rough numbers, an eleven second sea level car becomes a twelve second car up here.
Quote:
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650. 100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O. 2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel. 4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes). 2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next. Last edited by JSH; 05-16-2022 at 11:53 AM. |
|
05-16-2022, 11:45 AM | #7 |
Drives: 2015 Subaru WRX 6MT Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 2
|
Sadly, I believe the power loss is equal to that of NA. Turbo boost is controlled by the wastegate so while peak boost will probably be lower at high altitude, it can usually compensate and bypass less the rest of the time. Supercharger boost is mechanically linked to the crankshaft so it's always making a (maximum) relative boost to the engine RPM. If you're getting 2PSI less atmospheric pressure, then you're getting 2PSI less boost, too.
Not an expert but this is my understanding. |
05-16-2022, 11:51 AM | #8 |
Drives: '20 ZLE Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Mile High
Posts: 3,558
|
Using an atmospheric pressure of 30Hg at sea level and 24Hg here, you would see 20% less air pressure in your intake manifold when the engine is off here versus Miami
__________________
'20 ZL1 1LE A10,
OEM short block, LME heads/valve train, E2650. 100+ octanes, no eth, no meth, no N2O. 2/23 - 1031/1004 wheel. 4/23 - 1.41/9.61/145 at DA 7000 ft. (only made five passes). 2/24 - LME 390, E2650, FBO, 100 oct.; 1116hp/ 1063tq; 109 oct. dyno next. Last edited by JSH; 05-16-2022 at 06:46 PM. |
05-16-2022, 11:54 AM | #9 |
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 405
|
I've never used this particular one, but the Wallace calculators for HP from trap speed are almost right on for every car I've ran through it. It allows for elevation correction on HP.
http://www.wallaceracing.com/braking-hp.php
__________________
2017 ZL1 - PB 8.05 @ 172 MPH @ 3730 lbs @ 70 DA (work in progress)
Built by Vengeance Racing, tuned by Elite Tuned |
05-16-2022, 12:36 PM | #10 | |
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 11,601
|
Quote:
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune 1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18 3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18 3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18 4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18 4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18 5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18 |
|
05-16-2022, 12:36 PM | #11 | |
Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 164
|
Quote:
Not too bad then. I'm coming from a 392 challenger. Last time I was up here it was an absolute dog...don't get me wrong...it sounded great, but I definitely felt a big loss. So far the ZL1 still feels much quicker than what the 392 was even in indiana. |
|
05-16-2022, 12:54 PM | #12 | |
Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,534
|
Quote:
Yes N/A always going to lose the most. How much boost is it making now? There are many factors but 15-20hp per 1lb of boost is typical.
__________________
928rwhp - 93 | 1040rwhp/898rwrq - E65 SAE
LME 377 LT4 Short Block | Magnuson 2650 80mm upper w/13% lower (9.06) | DSX Lid & Valve Covers | CSP Custom Cam w/32% fuel lobe | CID Heads | NW 103mm TB | Roto Fab Big Gulp | CSP 2" Headers w/Green GESI Gen 2 Cats | Borla 3" Full Cat Back w/ S-Type| Mighty Mouse Wild Catch Can| Custom Holley Low side Fuel system| TooHigh PSI Port Injection w/Holley Controller | Forced Inductions Interchiller w/2 gallon fender tank | TK Performance built 10L90 |
|
05-16-2022, 01:14 PM | #13 |
Drives: 2019 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 164
|
|
05-16-2022, 01:54 PM | #14 |
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,209
|
It's a complicated engineering question. Supercharged engines lose power at elevation, just as all engines do, if they aren't compensated to make up the additional mass airflow rates required to make the factory hp rating.
Under some conditions (e.g., cool air), it's correct that the supercharged engine loses less percentage of its power at elevation than a naturally aspirated engine because the supercharger is able to force air through the engine. However, a supercharged engine loses more percentage as temperatures climb than a naturally aspirated engine due to the heat of pressurization. At higher temperatures a supercharged engine has to pull more timing causing a larger loss of power since the charge air is much warmer than a naturally aspirated engine in the same conditions. A balance between the two is required to estimate your hp as elevations and temperatures climb or drop. People see less "boost" at high elevations because the mass airflow rate is lower, thus, less pressure drop, which is really what the boost pressure is conveying - the pressure drop through the engine and exhaust system. Lower mass airflow rate = less hp. To get that power back you have to get the mass airflow rate up. So actual hp varies dramatically depending on air temp., conditions, and elevation. Note that the SAE engine rating conditions correspond to a density altitude of about 1800-2000'. So, if the DA in your area is ever 2000' (e.g. on an extremely cold day), the engine will be making around 650 hp. Sorry there's not one simple answer. I'd suggest that if it's cool out you use 1.5% loss per 1,000 ft of elevation, but if its hot, use 3% per 1000 ft. If it's warm, use something in the middle. Use airdensityonline.com and find a local track to get your DA, then you can start making comparisons based on the percent loss values noted above. You could theoretically over spin the blower to force more mass airflow rate through the engine with a pulley upgrade. It would create more heat since it would be operating at a less efficient blower speed and it would be making more boost than the stock pulley. However, the OEM intercoolers could likely handle it because it is likely still creating less boost than originally designed for due to the elevation, and would likely fall within the designed limits at such high elevations. Other power mods will also help, obviously, like ported TB, ported S/C, etc. I've simplified the response quite a bit, but that's the intro to it.
__________________
2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
2022 GR Supra 3.0 Past: 2018 Mustang GT Premium w/ PP1, MR, and A10 2007 MazdaSpeed3 1995 Pontiac Trans Am 1987 Camaro Z28 |
|
|
Post Reply
|
Tags |
power loss, zl1, zl1 altitude |
|
|