Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-09-2022, 08:50 PM   #1
SATINSTEEL1LE
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 21 ZL1
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: South East
Posts: 662
Replaced the AC Delco stock wires with MSD plug wires - Surprising results

I forgot to post this. But I made the switch from the stock AC delco wires to MSD LT1/LT4 plug wires. I read somewhere on here someone said the stock wires were best and had the lowest resistance. Yeah bull spit they do.

I measured the resistance on the stock wires and was seeing consistent 2100ohms. Yes twenty one hundred.

I then measured the MSD wires and was getting 30ohms. Thats THIRTY. Yes 2070 less ohms of resistance on the MSD wires over the AC Delco stock wires. Thats a MASSIVE difference. And on the box they say you should see about 40ohms of resistance, so they were even better than that.

HERES THE CATCH...

Not sure how, why or for what reason, but soon after the plug wires were swapped the dreaded cluster/radio going black during driving started happening. NEVER happened before to me. 21 ZL1 with just over 5k miles. So I immediately figured it was some sort of electrical issue with the new wires. Not sure where I read it because I was feverishly looking for google answers, but I had found a post somewhere that there was a TSB on this and the dealer would reflash the PCM to fix it.

Well I have HP Tuners and my car is tuned and I have the tune file, so I said lets see what happens when I reflash my car. I basically did a write complete of the same tune that was on the car already, basically overwriting it.

Well what do you know, the cluster/radio going off completely stopped. Not sure how or why this worked, but something was pissing off communication between the PCM and the cluster/radio. I was even getting codes for it.

But yes the MSD wires in terms of resistance are worlds better than the stock wires. I was able to open the gap on my plugs to .040 and have seen 2x better idle and part throttle driving performance.

Im not sure if the cluster thing was unrelated to the wires being swapped and the dramatic drop in resistance, but it had to have some effect on the car's electrical system throwing something out of wack. Flashing the entire PCM must have reset something and from there it was and has been perfect. That was like two weeks ago. Since then, not a single time the dash went out.
Attached Images
 
SATINSTEEL1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2022, 10:08 PM   #2
Ventmaster


 
Ventmaster's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 1SS 6spd
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,869
very interesting... one moment I was ready to replace my wires and the next I was thinking "if she ain't broke, don't fix it!"

It will be interesting to see if there are other theories as to the issue.
Ventmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 05:28 AM   #3
Spaceme1117

 
Spaceme1117's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro SS, 2011 Corvette GS
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Erlanger, Kentucky 41018
Posts: 815
So did some reading on spark plug wire resistance.

The main reason it seems for resistance in the wires is because the wires have a lot of shielding in them to prevent interference in other electronics of the car particularly the radio.

https://www.hagerty.com/media/mainte...s-demystified/

So it would make sense that your radio had issues after putting on the MSD wires.

Maybe the MSD wire will give a hotter spark and an extra few HP. I would say run them as long as you don't have issues from electrical interference in the car.
Spaceme1117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 05:37 AM   #4
Curr
Probably doesn't like you
 
Curr's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 WCT ZL1 M6
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Boston-ish
Posts: 1,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spaceme1117 View Post
So did some reading on spark plug wire resistance.

The main reason it seems for resistance in the wires is because the wires have a lot of shielding in them to prevent interference in other electronics of the car particularly the radio.

https://www.hagerty.com/media/mainte...s-demystified/

So it would make sense that your radio had issues after putting on the MSD wires.

Maybe the MSD wire will give a hotter spark and an extra few HP. I would say run them as long as you don't have issues from electrical interference in the car.
Agree that shielding should have zero effect on the resistance of the wire end to end. That just to reduce radiated / coupled signal. Which as you point out, could be the source of those errors.
I'd be curious to talk to an automotive engineer to see the reason for value, though.

2,1kΩ to 30Ω is a fairly significant difference. Not sure I'd change them without some further research.

(I'm a 25 year EE in RF / µW space)
__________________
I hope the 6th gen Camaro has a melodious horn trumpet. I'll tootel it at the ladies, yelling out "Hi hi." - RenegadeXR

كافر
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
железобетонное очко
Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
There is an unequal amount of good and bad in most things, the trick is to work out the ratio and act accordingly.
Curr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 06:33 AM   #5
LT4Greg


 
LT4Greg's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro ZL1 Coupe
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,813
I can believe the results you are getting with the new wires as back in the day when I had my 1998 Camaro SS I changed out the original wires for a set of red 8mm GM Performance Parts wires that really made a difference in the performance of that small LS1. I’m seriously thinking about changing the wires on my ZL1 but not sure now after what you experienced with yours.
__________________
ZL1 Coupe, PDR, Exposed carbon fiber hood insert, My Link with Nav, M6 6 speed and Silver Ice Metallic. Mods done: ceramic window tint, GM Accessories Camaro floor mats and Roto-Fab CAI.
LT4Greg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 06:42 AM   #6
laynlo15
 
laynlo15's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,860
Those are old codes, just clear them. This happens sometimes but not sure why. With your set up you'd normally lower your gap to about .026 to .028. Did you just reflash again?
__________________
2022 Lt1 6.2 A10, Maggie 2300, THPSI Port Inj/10 rib, Rotofab, E, Nickey, SCOL, Griptech, RC Bandits, Hoosiers/MT 9.80@142.96 1.44 60ft, 6.34@112 707/669 RWHP/TRQ. 16SS Maggie 2650 9.41@147 1.35 60ft, 5.99@119. 16 C7 A8 10.90@128 Bolt on stuff

Last edited by laynlo15; 11-11-2022 at 08:40 AM.
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 07:23 AM   #7
Vtor_ZL1
Who Needs to KNOW?
 
Vtor_ZL1's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 ZLE
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Left Side of the Moon
Posts: 1,771
At the voltages they operate at (40,000 bolts, very low amperage) the resistance does not contribute to weaker spark. Lower resistance does contribute to shit ton more electrical noise. There's lots of research around the topic and yet marketing around this stuff is astounding, errmagohd lower is better and for only $9.99 !



My opinion: Risky business flashing a tune on "noisy" electrical system.
__________________
ing for grip.


Are you in the NY/NJ/PA/CT region? Join us for autox fun at MetLife Stadium. HUGE lots, tons of runs.

http://www.motorsportsne.com/
Vtor_ZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 08:06 AM   #8
SATINSTEEL1LE
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 21 ZL1
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: South East
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vtor_ZL1 View Post
At the voltages they operate at (40,000 bolts, very low amperage) the resistance does not contribute to weaker spark. Lower resistance does contribute to shit ton more electrical noise. There's lots of research around the topic and yet marketing around this stuff is astounding, errmagohd lower is better and for only $9.99 !



My opinion: Risky business flashing a tune on "noisy" electrical system.
You don’t flash the car when it’s running so that wouldn’t matter. The ignition is on but the car is off when you flash it.

I was just astounded how much of a difference in resistance the new wires were in comparison to the stock wires. The gap I had before was .032 and the car idled rough and I was seeing tip in stumbling. Ted and I went round and round tweaking and logging. The bigger gap plugs and wires took care of that and the bonus was a smoother idle and better part throttle performance. I can tell a difference.
SATINSTEEL1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 08:20 AM   #9
Joshinator99


 
Joshinator99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,750
I’ve run stock and MSD over the years. But I’m currently running the top tier Granatelli ones and they are *really* nice. Seem to really stand up to the header heat too.
https://granatellimotorsports.com/i-...%7Cyear%3D2017
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
Joshinator99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 08:46 AM   #10
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,799
Sounds like a bad set of stock wires. I have seen stock wires measured before and they didn't have anywhere near that amount of resistance. I believe Andrew @ CSP tested them and that is why he had Stainless works make a CSP variant long tube header designed to work with stock plug wires.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 09:17 AM   #11
ctrlz


 
Drives: 2017 2SS, 50th pkg, M6, MRC, NPP
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ocean City, NJ
Posts: 3,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by SATINSTEEL1LE View Post
I measured the resistance on the stock wires and was seeing consistent 2100ohms. Yes twenty one hundred.
I went back and reread to make sure you said "wires" and not just one. If all 8 measure the same, then I would suspect it's by design, and not a problem.
So, did me some edumacation reading, as my knee-jerk reaction was that resistance should be low. Turns out the engineers have to strike a balance:
https://www.hagerty.com/media/mainte...s-demystified/
ctrlz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 09:37 AM   #12
Gunkk
Thank you Al Oppenheiser!
 
Gunkk's Avatar
 
Drives: Red Hot A10 ZL1 Convertible
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 4,975
Another "I changed my wires and my car is broke" thread.

Color me shocked.
Gunkk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 10:44 AM   #13
SATINSTEEL1LE
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 21 ZL1
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: South East
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunkk View Post
Another "I changed my wires and my car is broke" thread.

Color me shocked.
Taken completely out of context but I guess that's the way of the world. Sit in your bassinette and enjoy the pretty colors.
SATINSTEEL1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2022, 10:45 AM   #14
SATINSTEEL1LE
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 21 ZL1
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: South East
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingLT1 View Post
Sounds like a bad set of stock wires. I have seen stock wires measured before and they didn't have anywhere near that amount of resistance. I believe Andrew @ CSP tested them and that is why he had Stainless works make a CSP variant long tube header designed to work with stock plug wires.
No. Every single stock wire was within that same 2000-2100ohms of resistance. Nothing was bad and none of them were broken.
SATINSTEEL1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.