02-04-2018, 02:41 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
Someone educate me on C85.
I am not a fuel guy at all. I have been getting question on the benefits of C85 over E85 and if I tune for it and the like. I have no answers and I know there are some smart guys on here. So lets hear what you all have to say.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
02-04-2018, 03:10 PM | #2 |
Drives: '16 2SS / '05 SRT10 Ram / '65 bu Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philthy
Posts: 978
|
https://youtu.be/fsqM9uWGqlA
Certainly I am not trying to insult your intelligence but the Racing Fuels series came out last year, I think they put out a damn good study...albeit on a boosted C7...but it helped my understanding of the different types of race fuels out there. It's like a 13 part series I think, this particular one is the e85vC85 shootout.
__________________
H/C SBE 9.80@140 powered by Texas Speed
|
02-04-2018, 03:18 PM | #3 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
No insults taken. Thanks for the link. I did a little research but I like starting discussions on here and like hearing first hand experience.
Some question not answered in the study I saw was is there a retune required over E? Is the stoich ratio different? Is peak power made with more timing and different WOT AFR's? Since C85 has some sort of corrosive chemicals in it, will it mess up our injectors or cause them to run lean from polymer swelling? Can it be mixed with pump gas or E85? I have a bunch more questions but those are the first that came to mind.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
02-04-2018, 03:52 PM | #4 |
Drives: '16 2SS / '05 SRT10 Ram / '65 bu Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Philthy
Posts: 978
|
Yup, it didn't answer any of your questions. I can't see it making that much of a difference over e, especially a NA car. Did you notice that they were losing power on the graph until the upper band too ?!?
I guess if you are chasing every last hp available, you have to decide if the 15 to 20 dollars a gallon is worth it to you. Good luck on your info request homie.
__________________
H/C SBE 9.80@140 powered by Texas Speed
|
02-04-2018, 03:57 PM | #5 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
The test I saw was on a bolt on GTR and the C picked up huge at the same boost level and AFR. But they don't say how they got there. It picked up 22rw at peak and even more tq and 32rw below peak and more TQ.
http://dsportmag.com/the-tech/max-out-e85-vs-c85/ Here is the link.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
Last edited by PRAY; 02-04-2018 at 04:18 PM. |
02-04-2018, 04:23 PM | #6 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
The other thing I don't get about the Tuner School video is that they say there are no gains above E40. I know that on my N/A builds I see right at 25rw on E70 and above and the last two times the customer didn't come prepared and we only saw E40 all we got was 15rw. I know there have been others on here that had low E content around E40 and went back later at E70 or so and saw comparable gains.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
02-04-2018, 04:59 PM | #7 |
Drives: 17 SS a8 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
|
I could see how e40 might cure your octane needs based on your particular set up but a higher percentage of ethanol should give you more power. Same goes if your running methanol but even more power. They carry additional oxygen how couldn’t a higher ratio make more power?
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472 |
02-05-2018, 04:16 AM | #8 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
That's my though process. I have heard that at a certain point, above E60, you are replacing air space with fuel in the combustion chamber.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
02-05-2018, 07:26 AM | #9 |
Drives: 17 SS a8 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
|
I don’t buy that either.
I go with it as it comes out of the pump. E70-E85. Easy and awesome. I don’t see how the c85 would be any better other than it would be perfectly consistent. It could be better for a bracket racer. If I wanted/needed more consistency I would find a place with e98 out of the pump and run that for dirt cheap.
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472 |
02-05-2018, 09:51 AM | #10 |
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,800
|
My understanding is that C85 is just more consistent. As Parish pointed out it would be better for bracket racing where you are trying to run your dial in every pass. For most, pump Ethanol is fine.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA |
02-06-2018, 01:24 PM | #11 |
Drives: Garnet Red - 20 ZLE Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,010
|
I thought it was the same stuff just that each batch of C was tested to ensure its the same as the next batch and so forth. Its not as flexible as E85-E70 you get at the pump. You will Always get E85 every.single.time. That's the way I understood it...
No first hand experience just what I have read. |
02-07-2018, 06:21 AM | #12 |
|
C/E85 is expensive to try to use boosted. Feeding the monster. But then just add a pulley or open up the waste-gates to go faster.
But NA E85 is part of a subtle performance make over for an SS.
It looks stock when you take it to the dealer. The CAI is no big deal to most dealers. Then if you want to sell or trade the car, just put the stock tune in, remove and sell the CAI, and enjoy your next car. Sweet. This would be me if I had a do-over. Life is for learning.
__________________
"Democracy Dies in Darkness" |
02-07-2018, 12:18 PM | #13 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Suffolk Long Island
Posts: 954
|
I watched the MS103 vs E85 video and found it interesting the E85 made alot more average horsepower with virtually the same timing used with the MS103.
__________________
2016 Hyper Blue 2SS A8,NPP,Moonroof
Pray ported factory intake manifold Ported TB Rotofab ARH 1 7/8 longtubes hi flow cats AFM deleted E85 11.0@124.9 11.65@118.8 pump gas,stock tune/exhaust New combo: Pray Performance Heads/cam MSD intake manifold and Circle D 3C 554/491 on E85 all work & tuning done by Pray |
02-11-2018, 01:15 AM | #14 |
Drives: 2017 Grand Sport Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: NC
Posts: 54
|
I agree. From what I have heard C85 is just a guaranteed 85% blend vs a crap shoot % wise from the pump.
__________________
17' Grand Sport
PP ported MSD IM, NW 103mm TB, ARH 2" headers w/ 3" catted x-pipe, PP Flex Fuel tune, Halltech CAI, some radials and a CATCHCAN!!! |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|