Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-28-2022, 02:16 PM   #1
majdmajd
Constantine the Great
 
majdmajd's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro 2017 Turbo
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Israel
Posts: 23
Question Bad Spark Plugs?

I just changed my own spark plugs, and it seems they are Carbon fouled.
Even though, they been changed at 50k miles after one of the coils failed.

Would these cause damage to any of my engine parts?
Knock sensor? and coils?

Just curious...
Attached Images
   
__________________
In Hoc Signo Vinces
majdmajd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2022, 02:53 PM   #2
Ventmaster


 
Ventmaster's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 1SS 6spd
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,862
Have you made some aftermarket changes to the engine? How about a tune?

While these plugs aren't as pristine as one might expect, with the exception of #4, they don't look bad. You're hoping for minimal black carbon build up and for the ceramic surrounding (insulating) the center pin to be a nice tan color.

I don't think you ever find that on a modern FI, DI, VVT engine. They're just trying to be frugal with fuel and burning it hot, so you get some blackening around the edges and the center ceramic is more white (lean mixture) than tan.
As I said, it does look like #4 is either burning cooler or getting a richer mixture of fuel. Is that the plug with a bad coil? That would explain its appearance perfectly.

I don't think the condition on these plugs would cause any harm to the other components you mentioned. I think you are good to go!

On review I've got to say those pics do show a nice tan hue on the center insulators, with a little extra black on #4.
Ventmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2022, 10:04 PM   #3
S.Macias
Monterey County Camaros
 
S.Macias's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: California
Posts: 384
I changed my spark plugs at 105,000 miles. Yours look way worse than mine did.



One on the left is old, right is new.


I'd backtrack. Start with the fuel. I run only 91 and do the occasional Chevron Techron Complete Fuel Cleaner. I try and stick to either Shell or Chevron. If neither are available, choose another fuel that's a race team (Valero, 76, Texaco).



I'd check the coilovers and make sure they look good.



With the spark plugs, make sure they're torqued correctly. Think it's like 18.



If you don't run the car hard, it might be beneficial to drive it like you stole it every now and then. A buddy and I believe that performance cars need to be run hard to keep the parts working properly.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Follow us on Instagram @montereycountycamaros
S.Macias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2022, 11:20 AM   #4
majdmajd
Constantine the Great
 
majdmajd's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro 2017 Turbo
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Israel
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ventmaster View Post
Have you made some aftermarket changes to the engine? How about a tune?

While these plugs aren't as pristine as one might expect, with the exception of #4, they don't look bad. You're hoping for minimal black carbon build up and for the ceramic surrounding (insulating) the center pin to be a nice tan color.

I don't think you ever find that on a modern FI, DI, VVT engine. They're just trying to be frugal with fuel and burning it hot, so you get some blackening around the edges and the center ceramic is more white (lean mixture) than tan.
As I said, it does look like #4 is either burning cooler or getting a richer mixture of fuel. Is that the plug with a bad coil? That would explain its appearance perfectly.

I don't think the condition on these plugs would cause any harm to the other components you mentioned. I think you are good to go!

On review I've got to say those pics do show a nice tan hue on the center insulators, with a little extra black on #4.
The car is running rich from all the start stop in traffic I reckon... most likely thats the cause since i only use premium 98 octane fuel all the time, with additives from time to time.
__________________
In Hoc Signo Vinces
majdmajd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2022, 11:22 AM   #5
majdmajd
Constantine the Great
 
majdmajd's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro 2017 Turbo
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: Israel
Posts: 23
Quote:
Originally Posted by S.Macias View Post
I changed my spark plugs at 105,000 miles. Yours look way worse than mine did.



One on the left is old, right is new.


I'd backtrack. Start with the fuel. I run only 91 and do the occasional Chevron Techron Complete Fuel Cleaner. I try and stick to either Shell or Chevron. If neither are available, choose another fuel that's a race team (Valero, 76, Texaco).



I'd check the coilovers and make sure they look good.



With the spark plugs, make sure they're torqued correctly. Think it's like 18.



If you don't run the car hard, it might be beneficial to drive it like you stole it every now and then. A buddy and I believe that performance cars need to be run hard to keep the parts working properly.
Yeah yours is way better.........and the life of the spark plug i had should've lasted longer... which was a shame.

I have a feeling i should put back the stock inlet with the baffle to reduce the amount of carbon my car is making from oil.

I use 98 octane Fuel.
__________________
In Hoc Signo Vinces
majdmajd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2022, 12:27 PM   #6
musclesbmf
 
Drives: 2020 ZL1 1LE A10
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: Lutz, FL
Posts: 78
Normal wear on those plugs.
Stock tune I'm assuming?
musclesbmf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2022, 05:41 AM   #7
Spaceme1117

 
Spaceme1117's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro SS, 2011 Corvette GS
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Erlanger, Kentucky 41018
Posts: 815
Spark plugs don't look to bad.

But to me it looks like you are burning some oil.

How is your oil level?
Spaceme1117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2022, 08:39 AM   #8
SATINSTEEL1LE
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 21 ZL1
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: South East
Posts: 662
As long as the fuel trims are not maxed out negative, then you are not running rich. But you would need to log the car to see what the fuel trims are doing in real-time. But running rich is a relative term. A car is only running rich if the fuel trims are unable to pull enough fuel to keep the car at stoich. + or - 5% on the on the long term fuel trims would be fine. The car is able to add or pull fuel as needed to keep stoich. Its only if you are putting in too much fuel and the PCM is at the limit of what it can pull out, that you'd actually be "running rich".

The car uses the MAF as well as the o2 sensors to measure the car's air flow, and in turn calculate its fuel needs. I'd start by cleaning your MAF with the MAF spray cleaner and I'd think about replacing the o2 sensors.

Also unless you are modded, skip the 98 octane fuel. 93 is more than fine for a stock SS/RS.
SATINSTEEL1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2022, 08:58 AM   #9
easttxss
 
easttxss's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 2SS M6
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Hughes Springs, TX
Posts: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by SATINSTEEL1LE View Post
As long as the fuel trims are not maxed out negative, then you are not running rich. But you would need to log the car to see what the fuel trims are doing in real-time. But running rich is a relative term. A car is only running rich if the fuel trims are unable to pull enough fuel to keep the car at stoich. + or - 5% on the on the long term fuel trims would be fine. The car is able to add or pull fuel as needed to keep stoich. Its only if you are putting in too much fuel and the PCM is at the limit of what it can pull out, that you'd actually be "running rich".

The car uses the MAF as well as the o2 sensors to measure the car's air flow, and in turn calculate its fuel needs. I'd start by cleaning your MAF with the MAF spray cleaner and I'd think about replacing the o2 sensors.

Also unless you are modded, skip the 98 octane fuel. 93 is more than fine for a stock SS/RS.
He is in Israel, I believe they use a different rating system and their 98 is our 93.
I agree with cleaning the MAF and replacing the front O2 sensor, they do wear out.
__________________
David
'16 2SS M6 black on black, SW long tube full exhaust, NPP, Roto-fab CAI, ported stock TB
'16 2SS M6 black w/Metallic black stripes, Kalahari, 6 piston front (totaled 1/22/20)
'14 Fusion Titanium 2.0T
'83 Jeep Wagoneer
easttxss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2022, 10:19 AM   #10
ctrlz


 
Drives: 2017 2SS, 50th pkg, M6, MRC, NPP
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ocean City, NJ
Posts: 3,175
OP's plugs look pretty good. I think the photo is a little underexposed because the camera is adjusting for the wooden background.
Most of the world uses RON (research octane number). USA uses AON (average octane number, (R+M)/2 as the pumps say).
RON-5=AON
ctrlz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2022, 10:41 AM   #11
Edward Paul
 
Edward Paul's Avatar
 
Drives: LT1
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Fl.
Posts: 82
If I had one dirty plug like that, I would run a compression check.
Edward Paul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2022, 10:51 AM   #12
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,793
Catch can will help. Pull the intake manifold and you will likely see oil residue coming from the PCV. That oil eventually makes its way to the cylinders.

Edit*

I see you have a 4cyl turbo. Check to make sure the turbo isn't leaking oil.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA

Last edited by KingLT1; 12-02-2022 at 10:23 AM.
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2022, 12:35 PM   #13
buck50
 
Drives: 2021 C8, 2022 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 108
I would expect all plugs to look about the same. Your bottom one in the photo does not. Appears your car is 2.0L turbo 4? Is so plugs suggested by GM in USA market are 12681659 not the number on your used plugs? You mention plugs were replaced once at 50K, so how may miles on plugs in photos?
__________________
Order 9/09/2021,2022 2SS, NPP, 56W whls, B04 stripe, AQJ seats, N26 strg. whl., SLN brace
3000 1/19/2022
3400 1/25/2022 TPW 1/31
3800 2/15/2022
4300 2/19/2022
4B00 3/04/2022
4000 3/8/2022
Delivered 3/9/2022
____________________________________
Order 6/01/2016 2017 2SS, NPP, 56R whls
3000 6/08/2016
3000 6/15/2016 TPW 7/18/2016
3400 7/7/2016
4200 7/25/2016
Delivered 7/28/2016
Sold May 2020
buck50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2022, 01:51 PM   #14
ctrlz


 
Drives: 2017 2SS, 50th pkg, M6, MRC, NPP
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ocean City, NJ
Posts: 3,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by buck50 View Post
Appears your car is 2.0L turbo 4? If so plugs suggested by GM in USA market are 12681659 not the number on your used plugs?
Good pickup.
I can't accurately make out the full number on either the plugs or the box from the posted photos.
ctrlz is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.