04-05-2021, 01:22 AM | #1 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Korea
Posts: 417
|
stock(exhaust) vs lt2 intake vs procharger vs whipple vs maggi 2300
Even the units are different , you can check the shape of Tq and Whp. Last edited by shinysun; 04-06-2021 at 03:48 AM. |
04-05-2021, 09:07 AM | #2 |
Drives: 2019 Camaro SS 1LE Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Houston
Posts: 63
|
18hp from the lt2 mani is a pretty significant gain...nice
Last edited by wolfdog; 04-06-2021 at 09:49 AM. |
04-05-2021, 09:08 AM | #3 |
Drives: 17 SS a8 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
|
Cool. Do you have boost level for each that you can add to the charts? Did all the boosted ones have the same timing up top?
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472 |
04-05-2021, 10:56 AM | #4 |
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,795
|
Power curve on the Whipple looks different then mine. Mine was still climbing in power @ 6400rpm.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA |
04-05-2021, 03:15 PM | #5 |
Drives: 17 SS a8 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
|
Also what exact blower was used for each example would be nice to know.
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472 |
04-05-2021, 08:30 PM | #6 | |
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,795
|
Quote:
NA stock IM NA LT2 Procharger(not sure which manifold) Magnuson Whipple
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA |
|
04-06-2021, 12:34 AM | #7 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Korea
Posts: 417
|
Sorry for the possibility to misleading. I should have mentioned the conditions more.
Actually, I posted the graph for checking the difference of hp, tq shapes btw procharger(Centri) and other blowers. The comparison btw Maggie and Whipple is meaningless due to it has different timing and boost level. (19 degree , 0.7 bar meggi 2300 vs whipple 2.9 16 degree , 0.66 bar at the top) while 20 degree , 0.55 bar for procharger P1SC1 with Lt2 intake. The 2 graphs of N/A ,Lt2 intake and a graph procharger with lt2 intake are from the same car. I didn't mean which one is the better. Cheers! |
04-06-2021, 10:46 AM | #8 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 11,594
|
Much as I like to see the Maggie perform that well, it's indeed an unfair comparison with the Whipple when timings and boost are so different. If you post a graph like this without proper annotations, people will immediately draw premature conclusions.
__________________
2018 Camaro 2SS — G7E MX0 NPP F55 IO6
735 rwhp | 665 rwtq Magnuson TVS 2300 80mm pulley | Kooks 1 7/8" LT headers | JRE smooth idle terminator cam | LT4 FS & injectors | TSP forged pistons & rods JMS PowerMAX | DSX flex fuel kit | Roto-Fab CAI | Soler 95mm LT5 TB | 1LE wheels | 1LE brakes | BMR rear cradle lockout | JRE custom tune 1100 - 1/30/18 | 2000 - 1/31/18 3000 - 2/06/18 TPW 2/26/18 3400 - 2/19/18 | 3800 - 2/26/18 4300 - 2/27/18 | 4B00 - 3/01/18 4200 - 3/05/18 | 4800 - 3/14/18 5000 - 3/16/18 | 6000 - 3/19/18 |
04-06-2021, 11:09 AM | #9 | |
Drives: 17 SS a8 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
|
Quote:
Yeah but I still like the data and he is giving us the requested info. That being said my 5.3 at similar boost level picked up 21hp going from 16-18deg. Probably would have been 25hp at 19deg. And then add 4kpa which is likely 20 more hp. I would say there is another 40+hp in the whipple if timing and boost were matched.
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472 |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|