Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-29-2021, 10:52 AM   #1
Fraxum


 
Fraxum's Avatar
 
Drives: a M6 LT1 ordered From Becky!!!
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,520
Send a message via AIM to Fraxum
LT1 versus LT4 GM standard block build

edit: Stupid idea, I forgot the LT4 low compression pistons are part pf the short block.

I have this offbeat idea that some of you engineers and GM folks might be able to flush out (or flush down )

What would the $$ or practical limitation be to use the same block build for the LT1, LT2, and LT4?

In other words if all the LT blocks have the good stuff how much more does that cost to go LT4? And would simplifying the two build processeses to one save some of those $$ back for the more expensive parts and block casting?

This might also save warranty work to some extent with stronger internals. But I suppose the LT4 block also might need more of an assemblers manual attention/time.

Like all SSes have track cooling which is used by (guessing here) 10% of Camaro owners including the 1LEs could this another plus for SSes? Espcially if you track.
__________________

Last edited by Fraxum; 04-05-2021 at 12:21 PM.
Fraxum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2021, 11:58 AM   #2
Choda
 
Drives: Turbo 6.2
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 702
Good question. I've heard the blocks and heads are different material but I dont know. Looks like the vendors use lt1 blocks for most of their stroker engines they sell.
__________________
2016 Turbo Camaro SS - 800hp/900tq 9.7@146
2018 LTZ Z71 Redline Silverado - 381hp/420tq 13.8@100
Choda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2021, 04:02 PM   #3
Idaho2018GTPremium

 
Idaho2018GTPremium's Avatar
 
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,204
I'm not sure if you're just referring to the block casting itself, or the short block, or the long block. That said, the LT1 and LT4 blocks are similar, but the LT4 has additional pressure relieving holes in the lifter valleys to help allow for better oil draining. I'm not sure what other minute differences there are, but I'm sure there are others.

Practically everything that bolts up to the block itself, however, as I'm sure you're aware, is upgraded or improved over the LT1, so making the LT4 short block or long block into a standard LT1 would be too expensive. For example, the forged LT4 crank is stronger than the forged LT1 crank (which fails when subjected to extreme tests at LT4 power levels). The LT4 heads are Rotocast 656T6 alumimum - a stronger casting method and a stronger material itself.

Of course, there's many other differences in the long blocks as well.
__________________
2021 Camaro ZL1 A10
2022 GR Supra 3.0

Past:
2018 Mustang GT Premium w/ PP1, MR, and A10
2007 MazdaSpeed3
1995 Pontiac Trans Am
1987 Camaro Z28

Idaho2018GTPremium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2021, 09:16 AM   #4
KingLT1


 
KingLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho2018GTPremium View Post
I'm not sure if you're just referring to the block casting itself, or the short block, or the long block. That said, the LT1 and LT4 blocks are similar, but the LT4 has additional pressure relieving holes in the lifter valleys to help allow for better oil draining. I'm not sure what other minute differences there are, but I'm sure there are others.

Practically everything that bolts up to the block itself, however, as I'm sure you're aware, is upgraded or improved over the LT1, so making the LT4 short block or long block into a standard LT1 would be too expensive. For example, the forged LT4 crank is stronger than the forged LT1 crank (which fails when subjected to extreme tests at LT4 power levels). The LT4 heads are Rotocast 656T6 alumimum - a stronger casting method and a stronger material itself.

Of course, there's many other differences in the long blocks as well.
The LT4 crank is improved over the LT1 but you would never reach the potential to see the difference unless the thrust bearing is addressed in the LT4. That is the weak link in all LT motors. Kind of a shame really...put all of those nice parts in a LT4 then limit it with that shit half thrust bearing design that allows the crank to walk in high power applications. I believe you could go further if you removed the PD and went Turbo to take the stress off the end of the crank. Likely how LPE reached 1400hp on a engine dyno with a SBE LT4.
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP
Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP
Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA
KingLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2021, 12:06 PM   #5
Fraxum


 
Fraxum's Avatar
 
Drives: a M6 LT1 ordered From Becky!!!
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,520
Send a message via AIM to Fraxum
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho2018GTPremium View Post
I'm not sure if you're just referring to the block casting itself, or the short block, or the long block. That said, the LT1 and LT4 blocks are similar, but the LT4 has additional pressure relieving holes in the lifter valleys to help allow for better oil draining. I'm not sure what other minute differences there are, but I'm sure there are others.

Practically everything that bolts up to the block itself, however, as I'm sure you're aware, is upgraded or improved over the LT1, so making the LT4 short block or long block into a standard LT1 would be too expensive. For example, the forged LT4 crank is stronger than the forged LT1 crank (which fails when subjected to extreme tests at LT4 power levels). The LT4 heads are Rotocast 656T6 alumimum - a stronger casting method and a stronger material itself.

Of course, there's many other differences in the long blocks as well.
Yes, I was thinking short block. Some money could be saved to pay for better stuff in all V8 Camaros by unifying the process. It would be interesting to see the cost difference verus the two builds. And of course suppliers would have to keep up. It is probably not practical. I was not aware of the thrust bearing problem on big builds. But yea Chevy if you act on this crazy LOL idea fix that bearing too.

I wonder if the LT4 short block is heavier?
__________________
Fraxum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2021, 07:32 PM   #6
oldman


 
Drives: SS 6 speed of course
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hilo, HI
Posts: 4,316
Clevite LSx bearings are suppose to fit with "minor work to the block". That scared me away but I have plenty time how to work on it.
https://www.texas-speed.com/p-5649-t...-assembly.aspx

The Lt4 crank's 7/8 rod journal is solid (not drilled) as testing showed the LT1 crank to weak under boost at that location.

This looks like a standard thrust bearing to me:
https://www.lsxceleration.com/king-x...oil-clearance/

I don't remember off hand but I thought the cap had the cut for a full radius thurst. The real problem being is the cap can walk on the block which can cause the two thrust surfaces to be messed up. ARP studs? dunno, I studded my block, which is mandatory. Since the design was only for 1/2 radius I can see the cap side not being machined correctly, just "good enough" from the factory. I wonder if the Voodoo engine has a full radius thrust?
__________________
Forged short block, large duration sub .600 lift Cam Motion cam, 7200 RPM fuel cut, Pray Ported Heads, 3.85 pulley D1X, stage II intercooler, DSX secondary low side, DSX E85 sensor, Lingenfelter big bore 2.0 pump, ported front cats, 60608 Borla, LT4 injectors, ZL1 1LE driveshaft and Katech ported TB, ported MSD intake, BTR valvetrain, ARP studs, ProFlow valves, PS4 tires.
oldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2021, 06:32 AM   #7
L78toLT1

 
L78toLT1's Avatar
 
Drives: Hyper Blue 2016 2SS 6M
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: North Ga
Posts: 1,786
Parts commonality is a good thing, generally speaking, and if Camaro was the only platform using the 6.2L, I wouldn't be surprised if the advantages of maintaining the parts, tools, plans, etc. Would offset the slightly higher costs of the LT4. However, since the trucks/suvs use the same longblock as the LT1, the math to support one configuration no longer works.
__________________
Baby Blue
2016 Hyper Blue 2SS/6m/MRC/NPP/Silver Rally stripes/ZL1 wheels & brakes/GForce DS and axles/ZLE Cradle Bushings/FE4 ARB front & rear/SEMA Grill/Rotofab dry/95mm TB/Magnuson 2300/Full LT4 fuel system/JMS boost-a-pump/E85 Sensor/Ported CID heads from LME/Cammotion PD cam/Thompson Motorsports forged shortblock/catted Kooks 1 7/8 headers /JRE remote tuned
L78toLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2021, 07:40 AM   #8
Choda
 
Drives: Turbo 6.2
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 702
I completed a LT4 swap into my SS. The heads are very different. I want to say the blocks might be a little different in the water jacket webbing around the cly. I don't remember though. If I have time, I'll look through pics and see if I can find something.
__________________
2016 Turbo Camaro SS - 800hp/900tq 9.7@146
2018 LTZ Z71 Redline Silverado - 381hp/420tq 13.8@100
Choda is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.