[laynlo15]

No doubt my larger rear tires plus the 3/4 height difference plus the weight added to my slower 1/8 mile. I did go in and change the circumference in HP tuners, we still hadn't made any tuning changes to help with the taller rear tires. We could have compensated with additional timing on the launch, but we didn't because it was the first time out and it wasn't a test n tune where we were running it out the back door every time. When I go back out, I'll log and make changes to the tune to help with the 60ft and 1/8 mile times. That wasn't the goal at this race, the goal was to win the class, no more no less.

[lt4camaro]

Originally Posted by s346k

your car 1/8 miled 3 mph faster. the harder the car gets out, the more difference you'll see at the big end.

although if you look at the slips, the cars aren't much more than .15 apart the entire run.

The cars are close for sure. If I matched Laynlo's best 60 ft I would have ran a 11.59 ...a solid two tenths quicker.

[laynlo15]

Almost all the damage was done between 330 and 1000 ft. I think much of that is the weight difference. If my car weighed what yours does, I think it would be really close and I was running in higher temps and DA.
Me
60ft 1.755 Me

1.791 you

330 5.008 Me

4.959 you

660 7.645 Me

7.532 you

mph 93.63 Me

96.08 you

1000 9.897 Me

9.739 you

1320 11.792 Me

11.606 you

mph 121.31 Me

120.79 you