04-12-2017, 06:49 PM | #43 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
1.48 60 is killer, once it all falls into place you should be pretty happy.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
04-12-2017, 07:10 PM | #44 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
I was pretty happy with the 1.48, the 1.47 was better. If I can get my power nailed down and apply it properly then I think there is 1.45 in it as it sits at +1K DA like it was Sunday.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
04-12-2017, 07:11 PM | #45 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
LOL. I am working on it. At least I bought it and it is on the shelf.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
04-12-2017, 10:22 PM | #46 |
Drives: 17 2SS, 8L90, Cam, Heads, E85 Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 1,201
|
Any chance there is a TCM table limiting lockup if slip is past a certain threshold? This was a major problem in the Allisons in the duramaxes. EFI Live finally mapped the table out.
|
04-12-2017, 10:49 PM | #47 |
Drives: 2012 Mustang GT, 2017 Camaro 1SS Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: TX
Posts: 47
|
That is the shining light IMO. Get that HP Tuners fired up to dial in the trans/converter and you will be a very happy person.
|
04-13-2017, 06:48 PM | #48 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
wbt, what did your Mustang run bolt-ons/e85? 10.5, 10.7? I enjoyed reading about your car in the past, I think it was on YB.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
04-13-2017, 07:19 PM | #49 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
Pretty sure he posted 10.50's.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
04-14-2017, 12:24 AM | #50 | |
Drives: 2012 Mustang GT, 2017 Camaro 1SS Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: TX
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
With better fuel I believe there are some .30's in there. Those passes were made on the stock fuel system so no e85. To run the fuel I want I need 47lbs injectors and a boost-a-pump. I have the injectors in now and will add a BAP in the near future. Few pics from that day: Apologies for the off-topic post. |
|
04-14-2017, 07:34 PM | #51 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
wbt if you have a thread on another forum, please share.
Okay back to 6th gens. So these guys are locking their converters top of 2nd gear?
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
04-14-2017, 08:06 PM | #52 | |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
Quote:
With all the A8's forward gears and how tightly they are spaced, letting the converter slip is a thing of the past. Even all the fast A6 guys I know are locking in 2nd if possible. One says he would lock in 1st if he could. We don't need torque multiplication to cover shift recovery rpm deficits anymore. Plus these engines make a ton of tq. That is why guys are only going to see a .2 to .3 reduction in ET at best with a converter in this car. Gone are the .5 reduction days of old. I could see a much larger reduction in a cam car where you have slaughtered the torque though. The issue is the software from what I can figure, not the converter. I have no TCC pressure tables to play with. Only base pressures for the gears them selves. I did bump those up a bit for tomorrow and I am going to leave the stock TCC tables stock to see what happens mph wise. I was locking out 1st the other day. Locking at the top of first into second will be a game changer in my opinion. My only other option is to try a MSD to see if there is any gain up top worth a crap or throw a cam in it to extend the power band. I really like my set up and have no real intentions on spending any money on the current set up so getting the converter to lock when I command it to is the critical piece right now.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
04-14-2017, 08:26 PM | #53 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
6th gen A8 might be a totally different animal, but the 5th gens, if you lock at top of 2nd you might get a strong 60 and early performance, but the RPM drop is worse than if you didn't lock at all. Locking converters always pull the motor down.
Even with the gearing seems to me that locking up at the top of first not necessary but I've never messed with one of those cars yet. If you look at BH's best slips, if you throw a 1.47 short time in there the car would go 6.9's in the 1/8th and run about the same out back. Would be a 10.85 ish slip.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
04-14-2017, 09:04 PM | #54 | |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
|
Quote:
Locking the converter with this gearing shifting at 6,500 get's you back to 4,700 or so on the 1/2 and 2/3. It get's you 5,200 on the 3/4 and 5,100 on the 4/5. So it isn't dragging the motor down below peak tq ever. With the stock IM, even when ported you only have about 1K rpm between peak tq and peak hp. HP falls off hard after that. Tomorrow I am going to try to get some runs in with different gear lock ups. It just seems to me that if a car runs a couple mph faster in the 1/8 and 1/4 on the stock converter that is locked up that it should do the same with an aftermarket converter locked up as well.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|