Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Technical Camaro Topics > Wheels | Tires -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-26-2015, 09:46 PM   #29
rdowty
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 137
I'm going to need winter or all-season tires and there aren't many choices on tirerack even if you don't mind not having run-flats.

I really wish GM would realize that people want to drive there cars more than six months a year and quit making me buy new tires every time I get a new car. This thing is going to get delivered with summer tires in November and my first drive will have to be to the tire shop.
rdowty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2015, 04:31 PM   #30
IOMike

 
Drives: 2022 F150, 87 Monte Carlo
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: MN
Posts: 1,267
Quote:
Originally Posted by snaphappy View Post
I remember journalists HATED the SS on the track because of the staggered wheels. How could Chevy make this mistake again?

I mean I get that the 1LE is for the track. BUT every single journalist is going to put the SS on the track first thing and just ramble on about oversteer or understeer, whichever they can find. And when they find it, they'll just write the car off as a complete failure.
Simply put, the last car was not setup properly in 2010 for a staggered setup. No one complained about the ZL1, which was staggered, but had been tweaked to work with it. Many many many high performance cars are staggered and if it's done right, it's ideal for high powered rwd. Porsche, Corvette, Ferrari etc.
IOMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2015, 04:22 PM   #31
Norm Peterson
corner barstool sitter
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Drives: 08 Mustang GT, 19 WRX
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Eastern Time Zone
Posts: 6,990
Staggered tire setups sell because they "look race-y" (which appeals to the average customer) and because they are inherently understeerish (which eases the mfr's mind). The average customer can't tell understeer from underwear (and probably wouldn't care if he could anyway). Win-win for Chevy, and the experienced driving enthusiast kind of gets thrown under the bus here.

While understeerish staggered tire setups can be crutched with less understeerish suspension tuning than the car would get with 'square' tire sizing, you're then building a car that works at cross-purposes with itself, that ultimately throws away some grip at both ends of the car in order to come up with acceptable understeer budget numbers.

When you put a smaller tire on the heavy end, it will ultimately 'saturate' at lower cornering g's, and this will define the upper limit of cornering, even though excess cornering grip still exists at the rear that you can't get at.

Which brings the discussion around to power levels. Yes, you can use power to 'drift' the tail back into a more neutral cornering attitude. But this is not a stable condition, and certainly a trickier accomplishment than most average drivers are capable of doing with any consistency. Here, the excess rear grip crutches unknown skill levels (as seen from the mfr's point of view - they have to assume no more than minimal skills in at least some of their potential ZL buyers). Any additional margin against people spinning their cars out is a good thing.

For a skilled driver, the approach used for the 5th gen 1LE and Z/28 is better - a little stagger only in wheel widths helps keep rear slip angles from exceeding front slip angles and adds only a mild understeer effect rather than throwing away gobs of front tire grip to ensure that the rear stays back there.


About the Porsche in your list (and any rear- or mid-engine car) - any rear-heavy car absolutely needs the rear tires to be bigger. It's still a slip angle thing, and even Porsche has to keep the rear slip angles below the fronts under as many situations as possible.


Norm
__________________
'08 GT coupe 5M (the occasional track toy)
'19 WRX 6M (the family sedan . . . seriously)
Norm Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2015, 06:38 PM   #32
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdowty View Post
I'm going to need winter or all-season tires and there aren't many choices on tirerack even if you don't mind not having run-flats.

I really wish GM would realize that people want to drive there cars more than six months a year and quit making me buy new tires every time I get a new car. This thing is going to get delivered with summer tires in November and my first drive will have to be to the tire shop.
GM knows what everybody else should know: regardless of what the car comes with from the factory, if its going to be driven in a cold/snowy area you should use winter tires. That applies to performance cars, econoboxes, minivans, trucks, whatever. All seasons are only recommended for temperatures a few degrees above freezing & warmer. So they're fine for states that are generally warm, like California or Texas, but they are not intended to be used in climates where its the norm to be below freezing a couple months out of the year.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.