Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > ZL1 Discussions


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-13-2015, 10:56 AM   #15
Trans damm
 
Drives: Trans am
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Nyc
Posts: 565
Grabbed this off of corvette forum. No idea on accuracy. Claiming an LT7 is in the works, FPC NA
Attached Images
 
Trans damm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2015, 11:22 AM   #16
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Flat plane crank doesn't make sense in an OHV engine. The valve train won't be stable enough to take advantage of the rev capability.

Edit: This could be a Cadillac specific engine and move to a DOHC engine.

GM has already said a DTC system that could handle the torque of the LT4 would be too heavy. They already have the 8 speed auto and have been working on 9 and 10 speeds with Ford.
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2015, 11:42 AM   #17
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
I find it suspicious that Ford grabbed international auto headlines with the 5.2 FPC and now someone is claiming that GM is also.

Seems like a desperate "me too! me too!"
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2015, 11:51 AM   #18
hognutz


 
hognutz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: tangent or
Posts: 2,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven87 View Post
Any thoughts as to whether GM would remove the blower from the LT4 and leaved the forged internals to have a Naturally aspirated track-capable engine for the Z/28?

I think it would be an awesome motor, especially if they kept the HP north of 525-ish. It would be a good replacement for the fail-prone LS7 as a high HP N/A option.

Interesting to think about...

it's not that simple. they would have change the compression ratio, camshaft profiles, etc.

it would be a new motor. they would probably stick with hypereutectic pistons in a n/a motor as well as they have a more optimum thermal expansion coefficient and you don't need a forged piston in that power range at all.

you pull the blower off and lt4 and you probably just have a 400-425hp motor.

my ls7 lasted perfectly for 5 years but I was stock. I did inspect the valve train geometry based on the paranoia around the platform though.
__________________
shopping for 2017+1le or zl1
2009 CTS-V -sold
2015 Hellcat-sold
2013 ZL1 -sold
2007 Z06- sold
2014 Chrysler 300
2011 Duramax 8" lift, deleted tuned
hognutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2015, 12:01 PM   #19
Raven87
C'mon- really?
 
Raven87's Avatar
 
Drives: Looking for a ZL1
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nortwestern Ohio
Posts: 1,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by hognutz View Post
it's not that simple. they would have change the compression ratio, camshaft profiles, etc.

it would be a new motor. they would probably stick with hypereutectic pistons in a n/a motor as well as they have a more optimum thermal expansion coefficient and you don't need a forged piston in that power range at all.

you pull the blower off and lt4 and you probably just have a 400-425hp motor.

my ls7 lasted perfectly for 5 years but I was stock. I did inspect the valve train geometry based on the paranoia around the platform though.
I agree, it would be much more complex than just 'removing a blower'. But I was referencing the forged internals in particular for strength and reliability for an N/A motor.

Thanks.
__________________
Steve
2018 Camaro 2SS 1LE Black #3805 - SOLD
Raven87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2015, 10:39 PM   #20
396ssrat

 
Drives: 66 Chevelle SS
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,347
For the money the Gen 5 Camaro Z28 is underpowered. That car is in dire need of 625 hp.
396ssrat is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.