04-08-2022, 06:53 AM | #15 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
|
04-08-2022, 06:54 AM | #16 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
|
04-08-2022, 06:54 AM | #17 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
|
04-08-2022, 07:06 AM | #18 |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NH
Posts: 1,694
|
Have to agree with the other guys, the cam specs that you listed do not look like what I'd want with twin turbos.
|
04-08-2022, 08:31 AM | #19 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
|
04-08-2022, 10:00 AM | #20 |
Drives: 2016 1SS NFG A8 Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 46804
Posts: 6,800
|
Just to support what I was saying prior. Cam motions largest shelf Turbo cam is a 234/245 115 and has 9.5 degrees of overlap. That is less than half of your current cam which is still a little more than I would want. I would probably look at the 227/238 114.5 for a streetcar (3.5 degrees).
__________________
2016 NFG 1SS A8
Options-2SS Leather/NPP Perf. mods-Whipple 2.9/Fuel System/Flex Fuel/103mm TB/Rotofab Big Gulp/Cat Deletes/Corsa NPP Per. times- 10.5 @ 137 w/ 1.8 60ft Full weight on 20's 1200DA |
04-08-2022, 11:22 AM | #21 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
|
04-08-2022, 04:32 PM | #22 | |
Drives: 2020 LT1 M6 Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: South, the DEEP south
Posts: 1,114
|
Quote:
You don't want to over cam FI street cars, let the boost do the hard work and keep the stress off the valvetrain in my opinion. A cam like King suggests, possibly tweaked by the cam profiler of your choice for your exact build and usage is the way to go. |
|
04-08-2022, 06:15 PM | #23 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
|
04-08-2022, 06:58 PM | #24 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro ZL1 A10 Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 63
|
I agree with everyone else that the current cam is not ideal for Turbo. However, I don't believe a cam change will give you the 300rwhp that you are missing compared to Huron speed car
IMO, you have another problem somewhere else |
04-08-2022, 07:22 PM | #25 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
|
04-08-2022, 09:11 PM | #26 |
Old badass
Drives: 14GMC 2.9 16GMC Turbos 2020Silv.6.2 Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Arlington Tx
Posts: 240
|
I really like cam motion also. And yeah no need to go huge on turbo cams. May have heard of Jarrett Faggart (Stock 48) and his fairly famous triple 12? Choda knows him. 112 Int 112 Ex 112 lobe separation about .570 lift. As I recall he made 950+ with a 76mm sbe 6.0 LS, home ported 317 heads, truck intake manifold on 93 drinking meth like I drink Corona (a lot lol)! 9.6x at 143-144 @ 4920 RW. Granted it needed torque to move a 4wd not a Camaro but you see the point huge isn't needed. Definitely sub'd here.
__________________
I've had 7 Camaro's. All gone...for now.
Current build in progress 2016 GMC4x4 RCSB twin hair dryers ~1k whp fbe port inj 1/8 mi & stealth street terror |
04-08-2022, 10:13 PM | #27 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Bartlett, TN
Posts: 1,121
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk |
|
04-08-2022, 10:35 PM | #28 |
Drives: 19’ ZL1 A10 / 16’ C7Z M7 Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 247
|
Just a +1 for CamMotion over here. I had kip spec me a LLSR for my 96’ Camaro. That old motor screams and runs very well for what it is. N/A 383 rips to 7,300rpm.
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|