10-06-2015, 01:19 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2013 Camaro convertible 2SS/RS Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 1,077
|
Videos: 2016 Camaro SS Dyno run and 0-60 run
Has NPP
Dyno run: https://instagram.com/p/8gQVESJZEB/ ("car put down 405.2 HP / 405.4 TQ") 0-60 MPH: http://www.hotrod.com/videos/0-60-mp...s-25207/25207/ |
10-06-2015, 01:24 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2013 1LE Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
|
Let me be the first to say, with those numbers it must be underrated. That's like 475 at the crank!
Not my words, I just wanted to be the first to say them lol
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.
Delivered 21 Jan 2013 |
10-06-2015, 01:34 PM | #3 |
Drives: Chevy Duramax Join Date: May 2015
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 57
|
|
10-06-2015, 01:37 PM | #4 |
Drives: 2005 Cobalt Base - 5 speed Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 444
|
|
10-06-2015, 01:40 PM | #5 | |
Sales Manager for Chevy
Drives: Tahoe RST Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 1,313
|
Quote:
|
|
10-06-2015, 01:46 PM | #6 | |
GM repeat offender...
Drives: 16 2SS Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Grandview, Texas
Posts: 1,474
|
Quote:
__________________
'16 2SS, Summit White. A8. MRC. NPP.
Ordered:09/03/15. Received 12/22/15 INCOMING: ‘22 ZL1, Satin Steel. A10. PDR. Ordered: 03/02/22. |
|
10-06-2015, 01:50 PM | #7 |
Sales Manager for Chevy
Drives: Tahoe RST Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 1,313
|
|
10-06-2015, 01:55 PM | #8 |
Drives: Want a gen 6 Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: 75089
Posts: 1,032
|
That's looking like 3.8-3.9s!
|
10-06-2015, 01:55 PM | #9 |
Sales Manager for Chevy
Drives: Tahoe RST Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 1,313
|
So the SS is at 405 to the wheels squared. What about the Mustang?
|
10-06-2015, 01:59 PM | #10 |
Sales Manager for Chevy
Drives: Tahoe RST Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 1,313
|
|
10-06-2015, 02:05 PM | #11 |
Drives: Chevy Duramax Join Date: May 2015
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 57
|
|
10-06-2015, 02:07 PM | #12 |
Sales Manager for Chevy
Drives: Tahoe RST Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 1,313
|
|
10-06-2015, 02:08 PM | #13 | |
Drives: 2016 V6 RS Camaro 6MT Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,102
|
Quote:
Said the current MPG was at 9.5 mpg. They'd been flogging that car for a while. I'm glad I went with the V6 but wow! that is something else and almost makes me question my decision. I've never driven or even ridden in a car that fast. I've been deprived.
__________________
Summit White 2LT RS V6 ZN2 NPP m6 khalihari interior. Order placed 9/26/15 - Picked up 12/17/15!
|
|
10-06-2015, 02:09 PM | #14 |
Drives: 2005 Cobalt Base - 5 speed Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 444
|
You are CLEARLY forgetting that GM is a bunch of liars and that this is a ringer sent to the magazines for better reviews, the 6th gen SS will not offer real world performance anywhere close to this and will actually make 203.78 hp and 201.59 tq to the rear wheels while weighing exactly 4,357.88 lbs, WITHOUT the high performance floor mats and paint finish, of course. The mustang, on the other hand, is actually far, far superior to what literally all of the reviews of it ever have said, and it more accurately makes 526.7 hp and 543.93 tq to the rear wheels, while weighing only 2357.22 lbs, as independently verified by my source and only my source but I have no proof so don't ask but you can totally believe me. That weight is actually INCLUDING the high speed wipers and cup holders. The SS will, in REAL WORLD testing (not by magazines, of course) run the 1/4 so slowly that time will actually go backward and it will literally never finish a single road course because the brakes are so bad they literally disintegrated into nothing after only being looked at harshly, I know this because my sources tell me so, while the mustang actually finished the quarter mile so quickly that its run was only recorded by ultra high speed cameras and its time couldn't even be verified, and it actually finished every road course simultaneously, it was that fast.
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|