04-20-2020, 03:17 PM | #1 |
Drives: Turbo 6.2 Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 702
|
Check my math and compressor map placement.
I was thinking about where I am in this turbo map and unless my math is wrong, I'm right on the choking point at 10 psi and 730 wheel. I will be on the choking point with 15 psi and how ever much it makes.
Variables I used. Stock Camaro makes 400 wheel. My car made 730 at 10 psi. + 330 hp which is 33hp / psi of boost. Using my math on the far right, came up with 840 engine power with a 15% drive train loss ( -109hp ) which made 730 at the tire. Using airflow 1 lb/min = 10 hp. I concluded with 1.68 pressure Ratio and 73 lbs/min. Red Lines and Dot on the bottom right of the graph. Right on the choke line. It is being turned up to 15 psi. Using that math above I can guess what my car will make on 15psi and where on the map I will land. 2.02 Pressure Ratio with 89.5 lbs/min. Blue Lines and Dot, just on the inside of the choke point. Staying with each lb of boost will produce an extra 33 hp, the math says it'll make 895 wheel. That seems really high to me. Talk to me guys.
__________________
2016 Turbo Camaro SS - 800hp/900tq 9.7@146
2018 LTZ Z71 Redline Silverado - 381hp/420tq 13.8@100 |
04-20-2020, 07:41 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,749
|
Wouldn’t your 730 WHP be 840 BHP, so 84 lbs/min not 73?
Turbo looks too small across the board. You’re way outside the main efficiency island...?
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
|
04-21-2020, 05:44 AM | #3 |
Drives: Turbo 6.2 Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 702
|
Thanks for checking. You’re correct it should be 84 lb/min. Which puts me way outta the ball park. Is the 1lb / min = 10hp correct?
__________________
2016 Turbo Camaro SS - 800hp/900tq 9.7@146
2018 LTZ Z71 Redline Silverado - 381hp/420tq 13.8@100 |
04-21-2020, 06:34 AM | #4 |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,749
|
Yeah, that’s the rule of thumb.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
|
04-21-2020, 08:11 PM | #5 |
Drives: Turbo 6.2 Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 702
|
So now I’m much more off the chart?
How can mine pull hard up top and not fall on its face?
__________________
2016 Turbo Camaro SS - 800hp/900tq 9.7@146
2018 LTZ Z71 Redline Silverado - 381hp/420tq 13.8@100 |
04-21-2020, 09:01 PM | #6 |
Drives: 17 SS a8 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
|
The turbo is too small but that doesn’t mean it won’t work. It isn’t spent until you turn up the boost and gain no more power. It is pretty easy to see. 30hp per psi and then all the sudden you get 5hp for the next psi and then 0hp.
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472 |
04-21-2020, 09:03 PM | #7 |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS A8 Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Petersham MA
Posts: 4,749
|
Good call Parish. Plus, I’d guess your inefficiency at that level would spike IATs more so than if you were running a better sized turbo.
__________________
2017 Chevy Camaro 2SS A8 Whipple 3.0, Mast Black Label heads, Fore triple in-tank pumps, 112mm TB, LPE +52% injectors, LPE BB HPFP, 15” conversion 1059 WHP/944 WTQ, 9.48@150
|
04-21-2020, 09:16 PM | #8 |
Drives: 17 SS a8 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
|
Yeah, your iats will go up but it seems like when the hp stops climbing is the best way to know it is done. a little 50 shot before the turbo would make the turbo seem much larger.
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472 |
04-22-2020, 11:42 AM | #9 |
Drives: Turbo 6.2 Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 702
|
Makes sense, thanks boss. Well I hope this setup gets me to my goal because I don't want to replace this unit.
__________________
2016 Turbo Camaro SS - 800hp/900tq 9.7@146
2018 LTZ Z71 Redline Silverado - 381hp/420tq 13.8@100 |
08-12-2020, 06:54 PM | #10 |
Drives: 2017 2SS 50th Anniversary Edition Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 37
|
do you have an IG i have have question
__________________
Instagram- ants2sv4
|
08-12-2020, 06:55 PM | #11 |
Drives: 2017 2SS 50th Anniversary Edition Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 37
|
do you have a ig i have questions regarding this i remember you mentioned this his first post
__________________
Instagram- ants2sv4
|
08-12-2020, 09:23 PM | #12 |
Drives: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro SS Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 31
|
You'll eventually need to go T6.
Keep in mind the hp / lb of boost has a threshold. Once you start getting into higher boost levels you will gain significantly less HP per lb of boost. I agree though that you are outside of that turbos efficiency range with the car. Slap a 80-85mm T6 on that thing and let it eat. |
08-28-2020, 02:46 PM | #13 |
Drives: Turbo 6.2 Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 702
|
__________________
2016 Turbo Camaro SS - 800hp/900tq 9.7@146
2018 LTZ Z71 Redline Silverado - 381hp/420tq 13.8@100 |
08-28-2020, 04:00 PM | #14 | |
Drives: Turbo 6.2 Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 702
|
Quote:
Its been a while so, I updated my map. Ill also post the dyno sheet so you can see the power band.
__________________
2016 Turbo Camaro SS - 800hp/900tq 9.7@146
2018 LTZ Z71 Redline Silverado - 381hp/420tq 13.8@100 |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|